Abstract
This paper draws a connection between recentdevelopments in naturalized philosophyof science and the Buchanan research programin economics. Economic approaches innaturalized philosophy of science canbe combined to form an economic philosophy ofscience. After giving an overview of someof these approaches, I lay out the fundamentalsof the Buchanan research program. I arguethat its main elements are a theory of interactionsand a normative foundation in consensus whichhelp to answer some important criticismsof economic philosophy of science.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arrow, K.: 1951, Social Choice and Individual Values, John Wiley, New York.
Barnes, B.: 1974, Sociological Theory and Scientific Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Binmore, K.: 1994, Game Theory and the Social Contract Vol. I: Playing Fair, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Boland, L.: 1971, ‘Methodology as an Exercise in Economic Analysis’, Philosophy of Science 38, 105–117.
Brennan, G. and J. M. Buchanan: 1985, The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Brock, W. A. and S. N. Durlauf: 1999, ‘A Formal Model of Theory Choice in Science’, Economic Theory 14, 113–130.
Buchanan, J. M.: 1975, The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Buchanan, J. M.: 1990, ‘Europe’s Constitutional Opportunity’, in Europe’s Constitutional Future, Institute of Economic Affairs, London, pp. 1–20.
Coleman, J. S.: 1990, Foundations of Social Theory, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
Collins, H. M. and S. Yearley: 1992, ‘Epistemological Chicken’, in A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 301–326.
Dasgupta, P. and P. A. David: 1994, ‘Toward A New Economics of Science’, Research Policy 23, 487–521.
Diamond, A. M.: 1988, ‘Science as a Rational Enterprise’, Theory and Decision 24, 147–167.
Furubotn, E. G. and R. Richter: 1992, The New Institutional Economics, Texas A&M University Press, College Station.
Feyerabend, P. K.: 1975, Against Method, NLB, London.
Goldman, A. and M. Shaked: 1991, ‘An Economic Model of Scientific Activity and Truth Acquisition’, Philosophical Studies 63, 31–55.
Hands, D. W.: 1994a, ‘Blurred Boundaries: Recent Changes in the Relationship Between Economics and the Philosophy of Natural Science’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 25, 751–772.
Hands, D.W.: 1994b, ‘The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: Some Thoughts on the Possibilities’, in R. Backhouse (ed.), New Directions in Economic Methodology, Routledge, London, pp. 75–106.
Hands, D. W.: 1995, ‘Social Epistemology Meets the Invisible Hand: Kitcher on the Advancement of Science’, Dialogue 34, 605–621.
Hands, D. W.: 1996, ‘Economics and Laudan’s Normative Naturalism: Bad News from Instrumental Rationality’s Front Line’, Social Epistemology 10, 137–152.
Hands, D. W.: 1997, ‘Caveat Emptor: Economics and Contemporary Philosophy of Science’, Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings), S107–S116.
Hands, D. W.: 2001, A Reflection Without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Haskell, T. L.: 1984, ‘Professionalism versus Capitalism: R. H. Tawney, Emile Durkheim, and C. S. Peirce on the Disinterestedness of Professional Communities’, in T. L. Haskell (ed.), The Authority of Experts: Studies in History and Theory, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 180–225.
Hayek, F. A. von: 1952, The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason, The Free Press, Glencoe.
Hayek, F. A. von: 1978, ‘Competition as a Discovery Procedure’, in New Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 179–190.
Hodgson, G. M.: 1993, Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Hoyningen-Huene, P.: 1990, ‘Kuhn’s Conception of Incommensurability’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21, 481–492.
Hoyningen-Huene, P.: 1993, Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kitcher, P.: 1990, ‘The Division of Cognitive Labor’, Journal of Philosophy 87, 5–22.
Kitcher, P.: 1993, The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions, Oxford University Press, New York.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lakatos, I.: 1970, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91–196.
Laudan, L.: 1987, ‘Progress or Rationality? The Prospects for Normative Naturalism’, American Philosophical Quarterly 24, 19–31.
Laudan, L.: 1990, ‘Normative Naturalism’, Philosophy of Science 57, 44–59.
Laudan, L.: 1996, Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method, and Evidence, Westview Press, Boulder.
Mirowski, P.: 1996, ‘The Economic Consequences of Philip Kitcher’, Social Epistemology 10, 153–169.
Peirce, C. S.: 1879/1958, ‘Economy of Research: Original Paper’, in A. W. Burks (ed.), Collected Papers, vol. 7, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 76–83 (7.139–7.157).
Pickering, A.: 1984, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Pies, I.: 1996, ‘Public Choice versus Constitutional Economics: A Methodological Interpretation of the Buchanan Research Program’, Constitutional Political Economy 7, 21–34.
Polanyi, M.: 1962, ‘The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory’, Minerva 1, 54–73.
Popper, K. R.: 1957, The Open Society and its Enemies, 2 vols., 3rd ed., Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Rescher, N.: 1978a, Peirce’s Philosophy of Science: Critical Studies in His Theory of Induction and Scientific Method, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
Rescher, N.: 1978b, Scientific Progress: A Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science, Blackwell, Oxford.
Rescher, N.: 1989, Cognitive Economy: The Economic Dimension of the Theory of Knowledge, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
Rescher, N.: 1996, Priceless Knowledge?: Natural Science in Economic Perspective, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.
Rudwick, M. J. S.: 1985, The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Sent, E.-M.: 1997, ‘An Economist’s Glance at Goldman’s Economics’, Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings), S139–S148.
Stephan, P. E.: 1996, ‘The Economics of Science’, Journal of Economic Literature 34, 1199–1235.
Tullock, G.: 1985, ‘Adam Smith and the Prisoners’ Dilemma’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 100, 1073–1081.
Uschmann, G.: 1989, ‘Kurze Geschichte der Akademie’, Acta Historica Leopoldina, Supplementum 1, 2nd ed., Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina, Halle/Saale, pp. 11–65.
Wettengel, M.: 1990, ‘Die Geschichte der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften in Hamburg unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Mathematischen Gesellschaft in Hamburg von 1690’, Mitteilungen der Mathematischen Gesellschaft in Hamburg 12(1), 619–205.
Wible, J. R.: 1992, ‘Fraud in Science: An Economic Approach’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22, 5–27.
Wible, J. R.: 1998, The Economics of Science: Methodology and Epistemology as if Economics Really Mattered, Routledge, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leutge, C. Economics in Philosophy of Science: A Dismal Contribution?. Synthese 140, 279–305 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000031318.21858.dd
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000031318.21858.dd