Skip to main content
Log in

Economics in Philosophy of Science: A Dismal Contribution?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper draws a connection between recentdevelopments in naturalized philosophyof science and the Buchanan research programin economics. Economic approaches innaturalized philosophy of science canbe combined to form an economic philosophy ofscience. After giving an overview of someof these approaches, I lay out the fundamentalsof the Buchanan research program. I arguethat its main elements are a theory of interactionsand a normative foundation in consensus whichhelp to answer some important criticismsof economic philosophy of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arrow, K.: 1951, Social Choice and Individual Values, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B.: 1974, Sociological Theory and Scientific Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K.: 1994, Game Theory and the Social Contract Vol. I: Playing Fair, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, L.: 1971, ‘Methodology as an Exercise in Economic Analysis’, Philosophy of Science 38, 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and J. M. Buchanan: 1985, The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. A. and S. N. Durlauf: 1999, ‘A Formal Model of Theory Choice in Science’, Economic Theory 14, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M.: 1975, The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M.: 1990, ‘Europe’s Constitutional Opportunity’, in Europe’s Constitutional Future, Institute of Economic Affairs, London, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S.: 1990, Foundations of Social Theory, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M. and S. Yearley: 1992, ‘Epistemological Chicken’, in A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 301–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. and P. A. David: 1994, ‘Toward A New Economics of Science’, Research Policy 23, 487–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. M.: 1988, ‘Science as a Rational Enterprise’, Theory and Decision 24, 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn, E. G. and R. Richter: 1992, The New Institutional Economics, Texas A&M University Press, College Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K.: 1975, Against Method, NLB, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. and M. Shaked: 1991, ‘An Economic Model of Scientific Activity and Truth Acquisition’, Philosophical Studies 63, 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hands, D. W.: 1994a, ‘Blurred Boundaries: Recent Changes in the Relationship Between Economics and the Philosophy of Natural Science’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 25, 751–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hands, D.W.: 1994b, ‘The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: Some Thoughts on the Possibilities’, in R. Backhouse (ed.), New Directions in Economic Methodology, Routledge, London, pp. 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hands, D. W.: 1995, ‘Social Epistemology Meets the Invisible Hand: Kitcher on the Advancement of Science’, Dialogue 34, 605–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hands, D. W.: 1996, ‘Economics and Laudan’s Normative Naturalism: Bad News from Instrumental Rationality’s Front Line’, Social Epistemology 10, 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hands, D. W.: 1997, ‘Caveat Emptor: Economics and Contemporary Philosophy of Science’, Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings), S107–S116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hands, D. W.: 2001, A Reflection Without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, T. L.: 1984, ‘Professionalism versus Capitalism: R. H. Tawney, Emile Durkheim, and C. S. Peirce on the Disinterestedness of Professional Communities’, in T. L. Haskell (ed.), The Authority of Experts: Studies in History and Theory, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 180–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. von: 1952, The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason, The Free Press, Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. von: 1978, ‘Competition as a Discovery Procedure’, in New Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M.: 1993, Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyningen-Huene, P.: 1990, ‘Kuhn’s Conception of Incommensurability’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21, 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyningen-Huene, P.: 1993, Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1990, ‘The Division of Cognitive Labor’, Journal of Philosophy 87, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1993, The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1970, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 91–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1987, ‘Progress or Rationality? The Prospects for Normative Naturalism’, American Philosophical Quarterly 24, 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1990, ‘Normative Naturalism’, Philosophy of Science 57, 44–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1996, Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method, and Evidence, Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P.: 1996, ‘The Economic Consequences of Philip Kitcher’, Social Epistemology 10, 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S.: 1879/1958, ‘Economy of Research: Original Paper’, in A. W. Burks (ed.), Collected Papers, vol. 7, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 76–83 (7.139–7.157).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A.: 1984, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pies, I.: 1996, ‘Public Choice versus Constitutional Economics: A Methodological Interpretation of the Buchanan Research Program’, Constitutional Political Economy 7, 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.: 1962, ‘The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory’, Minerva 1, 54–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1957, The Open Society and its Enemies, 2 vols., 3rd ed., Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: 1978a, Peirce’s Philosophy of Science: Critical Studies in His Theory of Induction and Scientific Method, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: 1978b, Scientific Progress: A Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: 1989, Cognitive Economy: The Economic Dimension of the Theory of Knowledge, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: 1996, Priceless Knowledge?: Natural Science in Economic Perspective, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, M. J. S.: 1985, The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sent, E.-M.: 1997, ‘An Economist’s Glance at Goldman’s Economics’, Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings), S139–S148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P. E.: 1996, ‘The Economics of Science’, Journal of Economic Literature 34, 1199–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G.: 1985, ‘Adam Smith and the Prisoners’ Dilemma’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 100, 1073–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uschmann, G.: 1989, ‘Kurze Geschichte der Akademie’, Acta Historica Leopoldina, Supplementum 1, 2nd ed., Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina, Halle/Saale, pp. 11–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettengel, M.: 1990, ‘Die Geschichte der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften in Hamburg unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Mathematischen Gesellschaft in Hamburg von 1690’, Mitteilungen der Mathematischen Gesellschaft in Hamburg 12(1), 619–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wible, J. R.: 1992, ‘Fraud in Science: An Economic Approach’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22, 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wible, J. R.: 1998, The Economics of Science: Methodology and Epistemology as if Economics Really Mattered, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leutge, C. Economics in Philosophy of Science: A Dismal Contribution?. Synthese 140, 279–305 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000031318.21858.dd

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000031318.21858.dd

Keywords

Navigation