Abstract
According to the thought experiment most commonly used to argue against reliabilism, Mr. Truetemp is given an unusual but reliable cognitive faculty. Since he is unaware of the existence of this faculty, its deliverances strike him as rather odd. Many think that Truetemp would not have justified beliefs. Since he satisfies the reliabilist conditions for justified belief, reliabilism appears to be mistaken. I argue that the Truetemp case is underdescribed and that this leads readers to make erroneous assumptions about Truetemp's epistemic situation. After examining empirical studies of actual subjects who, like Truetemp, have received new perceptual faculties, I show that Truetemp must have been endowed with all of the reorganized neural circuitry and cognitive skills that subjects with new perceptual faculties normally acquire during a long and difficult process of adaptation and development. When readers realize how much more the designers of Truetemp's new faculty had to do than simply slip an artificial device under Truetemp's scalp, I find that they no longer think his beliefs would be unjustified. Because the thought experiment fails to support anti-reliabilist intuitions when further details of the case are made explicit, the Truetemp thought experiment does not constitute a clear and decisive counterexample to reliabilism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alston, W. P.: 1989, ‘An Internalist Externalism’, in Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp. 227–245.
Arno, P., C. Capelle, M. C. Wanet-Defalque, M. Catalan-Ahumada, and C. Veraart: 1999, ‘Auditory Coding of Visual Patterns for the Blind’, Perception 28, 1013–1029.
Bach-y-Rita, P.: 1972, Brain Mechanisms in Sensory Substitution, Academic Press, New York.
Bach-y-Rita, P.: 2000, ‘Conceptual Issues Relevant to Present and Future Neurologic Rehabilitation’, in H. S. Levin and J. Grafman (eds.), Cerebral Organization of Function after Brain Damage, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 357–379.
Bach-y-Rita, P., C. C. Collins, F. A. Saunders, B. White, and L. Scadden: 1969, ‘Vision Substitution by Tactile Image Projection’, Nature 221, 963–964.
BonJour, L.: 1985, The Structure of Empirical Knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cohen, L. J.: 1986, The Dialogue of Reason: An Analysis of Analytical Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Eddington, D. K. and M. L. Pierschalla: 1994, ‘Cochlear Implants: Restoring Hearing to the Deaf’, On the Brain: The Harvard Mahoney Neuroscience Institute Letter 3(4) Available: http://www.med.harvard.edu/publications/On_The_Brain/Volume3/Number4/Cochlear.html
Epstein, W.: 1967, Varieties of Perceptual Learning, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Fryauf-Bertschy, H., R. S. Tyler, D. M. R. Kelsay, B. J.Gantz, and G. G.Woodsworth: 1997, ‘Cochlear Implant Use by Prelingually Deafened Children: The Influences of Age at Implant and Length of Device Use’, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40, 183–199.
Goldman, A. I.: 1986, Epistemology and Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Goldman, A. I.: 1992, ‘Reliabilism’, in J. Dancy and E. Sosa (eds.), A Companion to Epistemology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 433–436.
Goldman, A. I.: 1994, ‘Naturalistic Epistemology and Reliabilism’, in P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 19. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 301–320.
Gregory, R. L.: 1997, Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing, 5th edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Gregory, R. L. and J. G. Wallace: 1963, Recovery from Early Blindness: A Case Study, Heffer & Sons, Cambridge.
Kaczmarek, K. A. and P. Bach-y-Rita: 1995, ‘Tactile displays’, in W. Barfield and T. A. Furness, III (eds.), Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 349–414.
Lehrer, K.: 1990, Theory of Knowledge, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Locke, J.: 1689/1975, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, P. H.Nidditch (ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Martin, T. A., J. G. Keating, H. P. Goodkin, A. J. Bastian, and W. T. Thach: 1996, ‘ThrowingWhile Looking Through Prisms I: Focal Olivocerebeller Lesions Impair Adaptation’, Brain 119, 1183–1198.
Meltzoff, A. N.: 1993, ‘Molyneux’s Babies: Cross-Modal Perception, Imitation and the Mind of the Preverbal Infant’, in N. Eilan, R. McCarthy and B. Brewer (eds.), Spatial Representation: Problems in Philosophy and Psychology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 219–235.
National Institutes of Health: 1995, ‘Cochlear Implants in Adults and Children’, in Consensus Statement Online 13(2), Available: http://text.nlm.nih.gov/nih/cdc/www/100txt.html
Plantinga, A.: 1993, Warrant: The Current Debate, Oxford University Press, New York.
Robinshaw, H. M. and R. Evans: 1996, ‘Assessing the Acquisition of the Auditory, Communicative and Linguistic Skills of a Congenitally Deaf Infant Pre-and Post-Cochlear Implantation’, Early Child Development and Care 117, 77–98.
Shafir, E.: 1998, ‘Philosophical Intuitions and Cognitive Mechanisms’, in M. R. DePaul and W. Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp. 59–73.
Sorensen, R. A.: 1992, Thought Experiments, Oxford University Press, New York.
Valvo, A.: 1971, Sight Restoration after Long-term Blindness: The Problems and Behavior Patterns of Visual Rehabilitation, American Foundation for the Blind, New York.
Warren, D. H. and E. R. Strelow: 1984, ‘Learning Spatial Dimensions with a Visual Sensory Aid: Molyneux Revisited’, Perception 13, 331–350.
Williams, B. A. O.: 1973, Problems of the Self, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wisniewski, E. J.: 1998, ‘The Psychology of Intuition’, in M. R. DePaul and W. Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp. 45–58.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beebe, J.R. Reliabilism, Truetemp And New Perceptual Faculties. Synthese 140, 307–329 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000031324.35563.1d
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000031324.35563.1d