Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026//1617-6383.14.1.14

Abstract. A medical news report was manipulated to project either Alabama or Texas as the target region for the outbreak of a new (fictitious) disease. Residents of Alabama and Texas responded to these reports, making the report of the threat to their respective territories relevant to them, while rendering the report of the threat to other regions of the country comparatively irrelevant. Regionally defined issue salience was found to foster superior acquisition of both quantitative and qualitative information of diagnostic value. Issue salience also led to estimates of greater danger to the public and self. It increased the perceived newsworthiness and usefulness of the reports as well. These findings suggest that issue salience motivates attention to, and the acquisition of, diagnostically relevant information that tends to be poorly processed or ignored under conditions of insufficient relevance.


Der Einfluss salienter Nachrichteninhalte auf Informationsaufnahme und Themenwahrnehmung

Zusammenfassung. Um den Effekt von Themensalienz auf die Verarbeitung von Informationen aus Nachrichten zu untersuchen, wurde ein Bericht unter der Rubrik “Gesundheit“ experimentell variiert: Probanden, die entweder in Alabama oder in Texas ansässig waren, lasen, dass entweder in Alabama oder aber in Texas eine neue (fiktive) Krankheit ausgebrochen sei. Entsprechend hatte der Bericht entweder hohe persönliche Relevanz, da über eine Gefahr in ihrer Region berichtet wurde, oder aber vergleichsweise geringe Relevanz, wenn eine andere Region betroffen war. Diese über den Regionalbezug definierte Themensalienz resultierte in besserer Informationsaufnahme sowohl von konkret-beschreibender als auch von abstrakt-quantifizierender Information. Salienz führte auch dazu, dass die Gefahr für die eigene Person und für die Öffentlichkeit höher eingeschätzt wurde. Den Ergebnissen zufolge bewirkt Themensalienz größere Aufmerksamkeit und bessere Aufnahme für bzw. von Informationen, die andernfalls kaum wahrgenommen oder ignoriert werden.

References

  • Atkin, C. K. (1985). Informational utility and selective exposure to entertainment media.. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 63-91). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar

  • Brosius, H.-B. (1993). The effects of emotional pictures in television news.. Communication Research, 20, 105– 124 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brosius, H.-B., Berry, C. (1990). Ein Drei-Faktoren-Modell der Wirkung von Fernsehnachrichten.. Media Perspektiven, 573– 583 Google Scholar

  • Brosius, H.-B., Donsbach, W., Birk, M. (1996). How do text-picture relations affect the informational effectiveness of television newscasts?. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 180– 196 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E. (1985). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: The role of message repetition.. In L. F. Alwitt & A. A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects: Theory, research, and application (pp. 91-111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar

  • Donsbach, W. (1991). Medienwirkung trotz Selektion: Einflussfaktoren auf die Zuwendung zu Zeitungsinhalten. . Cologne: Boehlau. Google Scholar

  • Drew, D., Grimes, T. (1987). Audio-visual redundancy and TV news recall.. Communication Research, 14, 452– 461 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Facorro, L. B., DeFleur, M. L. (1993). A cross-cultural experiment on how well audiences remember news stories from newspaper, computer, television, and radio sources.. Journalism Quarterly, 70(3), 585– 601 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Findahl, O., Höijer, B. (1975). Man as a receiver of information. On knowledge, social privilege, and the news. . Stockholm: Swedish Broadcasting Corporation, Audience and Program Research Department. Google Scholar

  • Findahl, O., Höijer, B. (1985). Some characteristics of news memory and comprehension.. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 29, 379– 396 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. . New York: Random House. Google Scholar

  • Freedman, J. L., Sears, D. O. (1965). Selective exposure.. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 58-98). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gantz, W. (1978). How uses and gratifications affect recall of televisions news.. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 664– 672 681– CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graber, D. A. (1984). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide. . New York: Longman. Google Scholar

  • Graber, D. A. (1990). Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news.. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 134– 155 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gunter, B. (1979). Recall of television news items: Effects of presentation mode, picture content and serial position.. Journal of Educational Television, 5, 57– 61 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gunter, B. (1983). Forgetting the news.. In E. Wartella, D. C. Whitney & S. Windahl (Eds.), Mass Communication Review Yearbook 4 (pp. 165-207). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar

  • Gunter, B. (1987). Poor reception: Misunderstanding and forgetting broadcast news. . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar

  • Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience.. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar

  • Katz, E., Adoni, H., Parness, P. (1977). Remembering the news: What the pictures add to recall.. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 231– 239 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klapper, J. (1960). The effects of mass communication. . New York: Free Press. Google Scholar

  • Krupat, E., Smith, R. H., Leach, C. W., Jackson, M. A. (1997). Generalizing from atypical cases: How general a tendency?. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 345– 361 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A. (1995). Defining audio/video redundancy from a limited-capacity information processing perspective.. Communication Research, 22, 86– 115 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGuire, W. (1974). Psychological motives and communication gratification.. In J. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication (pp. 167-196). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar

  • Neuman, W. R. (1976). Patterns of recall among television news viewers.. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 115– 123 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. A., Rosengren, K. E. (1985). Uses and gratifications research: The past ten years.. In K. E. Rosengren, L. A. Wenner & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research: Current perspectives (pp. 11-37). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar

  • Perloff, R. M., Wartella, E. A., Becker, L. B. (1982). Increasing learning from TV news.. Journalism Quarterly, 59, 83– 86 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion.. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar

  • Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H., Grant, A. E. (2001). Eds. Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar

  • Renckstorf, K. (1977). Nachrichtensendungen im Fernsehen. Eine empirische Studie zur Wirkung unterschiedlicher Darstellungsformen.. Media Perspektiven, 27– 42 Google Scholar

  • Renckstorf, K. (1980). Nachrichtensendungen im Fernsehen (1). Zur Wirkung von Darstellungsformen in Fernsehnachrichten. . Berlin: Spiess. Google Scholar

  • Robinson, J. P., Davis, D., Sahin, H., O’Toole, T. (1980, August). Comprehension of television news: How alert is the audience? . Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism, Boston. Google Scholar

  • Rubin, A. M. (1994). Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective.. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 417-436). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar

  • Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects.. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103– 122 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Son, J., Reese, S. D., Davie, W. R. (1987). Effects of visual-verbal redundancy and recaps on the TV news learning.. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31, 207– 216 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stauffer, J., Frost, R., Rybolt, W. (1983). Recall and learning from broadcast news: Is print better?. Journal of Broadcasting, 25, 253– 262 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thorndyke, P. W. (1979). Knowledge acquisition from news-paper stories.. Discourse Processes, 2, 95– 112 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A., de Vreese, C. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall.. Communication Research, 26(5), 550– 569 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, C. E. (1974). The effect of medium on loss of information.. Journalism Quarterly, 51, 111– 115 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management: Using entertainment to full advantage.. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 147-171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar

  • Zillmann, D. (2000). Mood management in the context of selective exposure theory.. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 23 (pp. 103-123). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar

  • Zillmann, D., Bryant, J. Eds. (1985). Selective exposure to communication. . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar