Teaching Learning Strategies with a Pedagogical Agent
The Effects of a Virtual Tutor and its Appearance on Learning and Motivation
Abstract
Numerous studies have tested the effects of pedagogical agents on learning and the influence of their specific appearance. What has not been analyzed, however, is whether an agent can have indirect effects when it is employed as a tutor for learning strategies rather than directly teaching the relevant learning material. In a between-subjects design (N = 45) we compared two different kinds of pedagogical agents – a cartoon-like rabbit and a realistic anthropomorphic agent – with a control group that was not tutored by an animated agent but was informed by voice only. Results showed no clear advantages for the agents compared to voice-based tutoring with regard to indirect learning effects, but they did demonstrate that the appearance of the agent matters. The rabbit-like agent was not only preferred, but people exposed themselves longer to the tutoring session when the rabbit provided feedback.
References
(2002). Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 416–427.
(2001). Intelligent agents who wear your face: Users’ reactions to the virtual self. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2190, 86–99.
(2005). The independent and interactive effects of embodied agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in Immersive Virtual Environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14, 379–393.
(2001). Permutations of control: Cognitive considerations for agent-based learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12, 403–425.
(2005, January). The impact of pedagogical agents image on affective outcomes. Paper presented at the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, San Diego, CA.
(2003). The effects of image and animation in enhancing pedagogical agent. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 373–394.
(2004). Merkmale, Ziele und Funktionen pädagogischer Agenten [
Attributes, goals and features of pedagogical agents ]. In , Informationen zwischen Kultur und Marktwirtschaft. Proceedings des 9.Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2004) (pp. 213–226). Konstanz: UVK.(1974). Physical attractiveness. In , Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 158–216). New York: Academic Press.
(2000). Embodied conversational agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2004). Eca as user interface paradigm. Experimental findings within a framework for research. In , From brows to trust. Evaluating embodied conversational agents (pp. 239–270). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
(2005). Avoiding simplicity, confronting complexity. Proceedings of the joint of meeting of the SIGs Instructional Design and Learning and Instruction with computers. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
(2002). Animated pedagogical agents. An opportunity to be grasped? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11, 267–286.
(2005). Five design principles for experiments on the effects of animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 209–225.
(1995). Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279.
(2000). The impact of animated interface agents: A review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 1–22.
(1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.
(2008). Pädagogische Agenten in multimedialen Lernumgebungen. Empirische Studien zum Einfluss der Sympathie auf Motivation und Lernerfolg [
Pedagogical agents in multimedia learning environments. Empirical studies on the effect of likeability on motivation and learning ]. Berlin: Logos.(2005). Pedagogical agents in multimedia learning environments: Do they facilitate or hinder learning? In , Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE) (pp. 654–657). Singapore: IOS Press.
(2007, April). How do (dis)likable pedagogical agents affect the learning process? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Chicago, IL, USA.
(
2007 ). Avatare und mentale Modelle: Einfluss visueller Darstellungen auf natürlichsprachliche Interaktion und Benutzerzufriedenheit [Avatars and mental models: Influence of visual representations of natural language interaction and user satisfaction ]. Unpublished Diploma Thesis, University of Bremen, Germany.(2007). AutoTutor holds conversations with learners that are responsive to their cognitive and emotional states. Educational Technology, 47, 19–22.
(1993). Physische Attraktivität [
Physical attractiveness ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.(2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. The International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 47–78.
(2003). FlurMax: An interactive virtual agent for entertaining visitors in a hallway. In , Intelligent virtual agents (pp. 23–26). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
(1996). The representation of agents: Anthropomorphism, agency, and intelligence. In , Human factors in computing systems: Chi’96 electronic conference proceedings. New York, NY: ACM Press.
(1996). Agents with faces: The effect of personification. IEEE: International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication (ROMAN’96), 189–194.
(2005). Social communicative effects of a virtual program guide. In , Intelligent virtual agents 2005 (pp. 442–543). Hamburg: Springer-Verlag.
(2008). Soziale Wirkungen virtueller Helfer. Gestaltung und Evaluation von Mensch-Computer-Interaktionen [
Social effects of virtual assistants. Design and evaluation of human-computer interaction ]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.(
in press ). Personalising e-learning. The social effects of pedagogical agents. Educational Psychology Review.(2007). The effects of an embodied agent’s nonverbal behavior on user’s evaluation and behavioral mimicry. In , Intelligent virtual agents 2007 (pp. 238–251). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
(2009). Lernstrategien und Textverstehen. Spontaner Einsatz und Förderung von Lernstrategien [
Learning strategies and text comprehension. Spontaneous use and enhancement of learning strategies ]. Münster: Waxmann.(2007). Self-regulated learning from science texts. In , Studies on the educational quality of schools. The final report on the DFG Priority Program (pp. 221–238). Münster: Waxmann.
(1997, February). Increasing believability in animated pedagogical agents. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 16–21. New York, NY: ACM Press.
(1997). The persona effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In , Human factors in computing systems: CHI’97 conference proceedings (pp. 59–366). New York: ACM.
(2000). Deictic and emotive communication in animated pedagogical agents. In , Embodied conversational agents (pp. 123–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
(2003). Selbstreguliertes Lernen als Selbstregulation von Lernstrategien. Ein Trainingsexperiment mit Berufstätigen zum Lernen mit Sachtexten [
Self-regulated learning as self-regulation of learning strategies. A training experiment with people at work ]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 31, 38–56.(2001). Studierende können lernen, sich selbst zum Lernen zu motivieren. Ein Trainingsexperiment [
Students can learn to motivate themselves for learning. A training experiment ]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 15, 155–167.(2007). Self-regulated learning with a text-highlighting strategy. A training experiment. Journal of Psychology, 215, 174–182.
(2001). Software agents in multimedia: An experimental study of their contributions to students’ learning. Human-computer interaction proceedings (pp. 275–277). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(
2003 ). Animated pedagogical agents: How do they help student construct knowledge from interactive multimedia environments? Unpublished manuscript.(2004). Animated pedagogical agents in educational technology. Educational Technology, 44(6), 23–30.
(2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19, 177–213.
(2000). Speech interfaces from an evolutionary perspective. Communications of the ACM, 43(9), 36–43.
(2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 60(1), 81–103.
(2001). AutoTutor: Incorporating backchannel feedback and other human-like conversational behaviors into an intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Speech Technology, 4, 117–126.
(2001). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen [
FAM: A questionnaire on the assessment of current motivation in learning and achievement situations ]. Diagnostica, 47(2), 57–66.(2000). Task oriented collaboration with embodied agents in virtual worlds. In , Embodied conversational agents (pp. 95–122). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1996). When the interface is a face. Human Computer Interaction, 11(2), 97–124.
(2007) Realism is not all! User engagement with task-related interface characters. Interacting with Computers, 19, 267–280.
(1994). Using a human face in an interface. In , Human factors in computing systems: CHI’94 conference proceedings (pp. 85–91). Boston, MA: ACM.
(2007). A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces. CHI 2007 proceedings: Faces & bodies in interaction, April 28–May 3, San Jose, CA, USA.
