Abstract
Abstract. In recent years, the viewing of reality television has become increasingly prevalent among television audiences. However, little is known about the psychological processes at work when viewing these programs. This study examined how social comparisons to cast members influenced emotional responses to reality television programming. Participants (N = 231) were cued with a specific comparison target group and placed in a situation of self-image enhancement or threat. Afterwards, participants watched a clip from a reality television program and then reported their emotional reactions to it. The manipulations of comparison target group and self-image affected both the direction of social comparisons made and their associated emotional responses. Participant gender also influenced social comparisons to the cast members and resulting emotional responses to the content. Although we were unable to compare the social comparison-related emotional responses to reality programs with those of scripted programs, the results of this study bring to bear the associations between specific emotional responses and the types of social comparisons that take place when watching reality television programming.
References
2012, June 21). The 2011-12 TV season: What we watched and what we skipped. Vulture, Retrieved from http://www.vulture.com/2012/06/201112-tv-season-by-the-numbers.html
(2012). Investigating personality and viewing-motivation correlates of reality television exposure. Communication Quarterly, 60(1), 80–102.
(2006). Can the media affect us? Social comparison, self-discrepancy, and the thin ideal. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(3), 239–251.
(1992). When Gulliver travels: Social context, psychological closeness, and self-appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 717–727.
(2007). Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1), 3–21.
(2011).
(Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms . In D. ChadeeEd., Theories in social psychology (pp. 119–139). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.2010). Does reality backbite? Physical, verbal, and relational aggression in reality television programs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(2), 282–298.
(2013). Reality television predicts both positive and negative outcomes for adolescent girls. The Journal of Pediatrics, 162, 1175–1180.
(2007). The content of reality dating shows and viewer perceptions of dating. Journal of Communication, 57, 490–510.
(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.
(1999). Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 129–142.
(2004). How dissimilar others may still resemble the self: Assimilation and contrast after social comparison. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 187–196.
(1966). Threat as a determinant of downward comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1(Suppl. 1), 32–39.
(2006). Viewers’ perceptions of reality programs. Communication Quarterly, 54(2), 191–214.
(2009). Perceptions of the authenticity of reality programs and their relationships to audience involvement, enjoyment, and perceived learning. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 515–531.
(1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895–910.
(2000). Interpersonal evaluations following threats to self: Role of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 725–736.
(2003).
(Assessing self-esteem . In S. J. LopezC. R. SnyderEds., Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 219–233). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.2011, January 7). ‘Jersey Shore’ ratings go nuclear: Most-watched MTV series telecast ever. EW.com, Retrieved from http://insidetv.ew.com/2011/01/07/jersey-shore-ratings-record/
(2005). Reality TV: Audiences and popular factual television. New York: Routledge.
(1990). Mirror images: Effects of the standard of beauty on the self- and body-esteem of women exhibiting varying levels of bulimic symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 230–242.
(2008). News selection patterns as a function of race: The discerning minority and the indiscriminating majority. Media Psychology, 11, 400–417.
(2006). Social comparisons with news personae: Selective exposure to news portrayals of same-sex and same-age characters. Communication Research, 33(4), 262–284.
(2010). Please your self: Social identity effects on selective exposure to news about in- and out-groups. Journal of Communication, 60, 515–535.
(2008). Constructing gender stereotypes through social roles in prime-time television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 200–214.
(2008). Simply irresistible: Reality TV consumption patterns. Communication Quarterly, 56, 208–225.
(1992). Elderly viewers’ responses to televised portrayals of old age empathy and mood management versus social comparison. Communication Research, 19, 459–478.
(2012, October 4). Why reality TV doesn’t suck, and may even make us smarter. Wired.com, Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/10/why-reality-tv-doesnt-suck-and-may-even-make-us-smarter/
(1968). The Remote Associates Test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 213–214.
(2007). Determining dimensions of reality: A concept mapping of the reality TV landscape. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 371–390.
(2014). Inspired by hope, motivated by envy: Comparing the effects of discrete emotions in the process of social comparison to media figures. Media Psychology, 17, 208–234.
(2006). Emotional and cognitive predictors of the enjoyment and reality-based and fictional television programming: An elaboration of the uses and gratifications perspective. Media Psychology, 8, 421–447.
(2012). Inspiration or deflation? Feeling similar or dissimilar to slim and plus-size models affects self-evaluation of restrained eaters. Body Image, 9(1), 76–85.
(1997). Antisocial acts in reality programming on television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41(1), 69–75.
(2003).
(Disposition-based theories of enjoyment . In J. BryantD. Roskos-EwoldsenJ. CantorEds., Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 61–84). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.2004). Why people watch reality TV. Media Psychology, 6, 363–378.
(2013). A Snooki effect? An exploration of the surveillance subgenre of reality TV and viewers’ beliefs about the “real” real word. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2, 237–250.
(2007). Better, stronger, faster: Self-serving judgment, affect regulation, and the optimal vigilance hypothesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(2), 124–141.
(2000).
(Assimilative and contrastive emotional reactions to upward and downward social comparisons . In J. SulsL. WheelerEds., Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 173–200). New York: Plenum.2001). Maintaining one’s self-image vis-á-vis others: the role of self-affirmation in the social evaluation of the self. Motivation and Emotion, 25(1), 41–65.
(2002). Social Comparison: Why, with whom and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159–163.
(2008). Entertainment is emotion: The functional architecture of the entertainment experience. Media Psychology, 11(1), 28–51.
(1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96, 569–575.
(1983). It could be worse: Selective evaluation as a response to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 19–40.
(2004). The role of social comparison in the effect of magazine advertisements on women’s mood and body dissatisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(1), 23–44.
(2001). Self-esteem and threats to self: Implications for self-construals and interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1103–1118.
(2004). Ego threats elicits different social comparison process among high and low self-esteem people: Implications for interpersonal perceptions. Social Cognition, 22(1), 168–191.
(2009). The role of graphic and sanitized violence in the enjoyment of television dramas. Human Communication Research, 35, 442–463.
(1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271.
(1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231–248.
(1985). Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1169–1183.
(1994).
(Entertainment as media effect . In J. BryantD. ZillmannEds., Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 437–461). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.