Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

Safikhani et al. reply

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Geeleher, P., Gamazon, E. R., Seoighe, C., Cox, N. J. & Huang, R. S. Consistency in large pharmacogenomic studies. Nature 540, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature19838 (2016)

  2. Garnett, M. J. et al. Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells. Nature 483, 570–575 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barretina, J. et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature 483, 603–607 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haibe-Kains, B. et al. Inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies. Nature 504, 389–393 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Safikhani, Z. et al. Revisiting inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies. F1000Research http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9611.1 (2016)

  6. Haverty, P. M. et al. Reproducible pharmacogenomic profiling of cancer cell line panels. Nature 533, 333–337 (2016)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia Consortium and Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer Investigators. Pharmacogenomic agreement between two cancer cell line data sets. Nature 528, 84–87 (2015)

  8. Matthews, B. W. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 405, 442–451 (1975)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Geeleher, P., Cox, N. J. & Huang, R. S. Clinical drug response can be predicted using baseline gene expression levels and in vitro drug sensitivity in cell lines. Genome Biol. 15, R47 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Papillon-Cavanagh, S. et al. Comparison and validation of genomic predictors for anticancer drug sensitivity. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 20, 597–602 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong, Z. et al. Anticancer drug sensitivity prediction in cell lines from baseline gene expression through recursive feature selection. BMC Cancer 15, 489 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jang, I. S., Neto, E. C., Guinney, J., Friend, S. H. & Margolin, A. A. Systematic assessment of analytical methods for drug sensitivity prediction from cancer cell line data. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2014, 63–74 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cortés-Ciriano, I. et al. Improved large-scale prediction of growth inhibition patterns using the NCI60 cancer cell line panel. Bioinformatics 32, 85–95 (2015)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Goodspeed, A., Heiser, L. M., Gray, J. W. & Costello, J. C. Tumor-derived cell lines as molecular models of cancer pharmacogenomics. Mol. Cancer Res. 14, 3–13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandve, G. K, Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J. & Hovig, E. Ten simple rules for reproducible computational research. PLoS Comput. Biol.9, e1003285 (2013).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Haibe-Kains.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Tables 1-2, Supplementary Figures 1-7 and additional references. (PDF 1357 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Safikhani, Z., El-Hachem, N., Smirnov, P. et al. Safikhani et al. reply. Nature 540, E2–E4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19839

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19839

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing