Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Consider laboratory aspects in developing patient prediction models

The Original Article was published on 14 May 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Purchase on Springer Link

Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Yan, L. et al. An interpretable mortality prediction model for COVID-19 patients. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 283–288 (2020).

  2. Plebani, M. Quality indicators to detect pre-analytical errors in laboratory testing. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 33, 85–88 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simundic, A. M., Baird, G., Cadamuro, J., Costelloe, S. J. & Lippi, G. Managing haemolyzed samples in clinical laboratories. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 57, 1–21 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Herman, D. S., Toro, E., Baraban, E. G., Bagg, A. & Wang, P. Falsely increased plasma lactate dehydrogenase without hemolysis following transport through pneumatic tube system. J. Appl. Lab. Med. 4, 433–438 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao, L. V. & Snyder, L. M. Effect of pneumatic tube system transport on serum and plasma enzyme levels. Int. J. Clin. Med. Res. 3, 20–23 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schumann, G. et al. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 degrees C. Part 3. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 40, 643–648 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick J. Twomey.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reeve, J.L.V., Twomey, P.J. Consider laboratory aspects in developing patient prediction models. Nat Mach Intell 3, 18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0221-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0221-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing