Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Avoid diluting democracy by algorithms

There is a tendency among AI researchers to use the concepts of democracy and democratization in ways that are only loosely connected to their political and historical meanings. We argue that it is important to take the concept more seriously in AI research by engaging with political philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Koster, R. et al. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01383-x (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, M. K. et al. in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, 1–35 (2019).

  3. Zheng, S., Trott, A., Srinivasa, S., Parkes, D. C. & Socher, R. Sci. Adv. 8, eabk2607 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Achen, C. H. & Bartels, L. M. Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government (Princeton Univ. Press, 2017).

  5. Sætra, H. S. Technol. Soc. 62, 101283 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coeckelbergh, M. The Political Philosophy of AI (Polity Press, 2022).

  7. Davis, D. D. & Holt, C. A. Experimental economics (Princeton Univ. Press, 2021).

  8. Kobayashi, Y., Ishibashi, M. & Kobayashi, H. Jpn J. Radiol. 37, 9–14 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Winner, L. Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought (MIT Press, 1977).

  10. Held, D. Models of democracy (Stanford Univ. Press, 2006).

  11. Schumpeter, J. A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy (Routledge, 2013).

  12. Dahl, R. A. Democracy and its Critics (Yale Univ. Press, 2008).

  13. Elster, J. Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics 3, 18 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mouffe, C. On the political (Routledge, 2005).

  15. Buhmann, A. & Fieseler, C. Bus. Ethics Q. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2021.42 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Division for Sustainable Development Goals: New York, NY, USA, 2015).

  17. Sætra, H. S. Artificial intelligence and its context: issues, domains, applications (eds Visvizi, A. & Bodziany, M.) (Springer, 2022).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik Skaug Sætra.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Machine Intelligence thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sætra, H.S., Borgebund, H. & Coeckelbergh, M. Avoid diluting democracy by algorithms. Nat Mach Intell 4, 804–806 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00537-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00537-w

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing