Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Intellectual property core implementation of decision trees

Intellectual property core implementation of decision trees

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Computers & Digital Techniques — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Several soft intellectual property (IP) core implementations of decision trees (axis-parallel, oblique and nonlinear) based on the concept of universal node (UN) and sequence of UNs are presented. Proposed IP cores are suitable for implementation in both field programmable gate arrays and application specific integrated circuits. Developed IP cores can be easily customised in order to fit a wide variety of application requirements, fulfilling their role as general purpose building blocks for SoC designs. Experimental results obtained on 23 data sets of standard UCI machine learning repository database suggest that the proposed architecture based on the sequence of UNs requires on average 56% less hardware resources compared with previously proposed architectures, having the same throughput.

References

    1. 1)
      • D.J. Newman . (1998) UCI repository of machine learning databases.
    2. 2)
      • A. Yilmaz , O. Javed , M. Shah . Object tracking: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. , 4 , 1 - 45
    3. 3)
      • L. Rokach , O. Maimon . Top-down induction of decision trees – a survey. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. , 4 , 476 - 487
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • L. Breiman , J.H. Friedman , R.A. Olshen , C.J. Stone . (1984) Classification and regression trees.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • J.R. Quinlan . (1993) C4.5: programs for machine learning.
    9. 9)
      • Xilinx.
    10. 10)
      • C.M. Bishop . (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • Struharik, R., Novak, L.: `Evolving oblique and non-linear decision trees', Internal Report, 2006, FTN.
    13. 13)
      • Murthy, S.K.: `On growing better decision trees from data', 1997, PhD, University of Maryland, College Park.
    14. 14)
      • Lopez-Estrada, S., Cumplido, R.: `Decision tree based FPGA architecture for texture sea state classification', Reconfigurable Computing and FPGA's ReConFig. 2006 IEEE Int. Conf., September 2006, p. 1–7.
    15. 15)
      • Ittner, A., Schlosser, M.: `Non-linear decision trees', Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Machine Learning, 1996.
    16. 16)
      • V.N. Vapnik . (1998) Statistical learning theory.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cdt.2008.0055
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cdt.2008.0055
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address