Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Analysis, simulation and measurement in large-scale packet networks

Analysis, simulation and measurement in large-scale packet networks

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The authors review analysis, simulation and measurement techniques, the three fundamental methods for performance evaluation in packet networks, looking at what's known, what's new and some outstanding issues. In trying to avoid re-reviewing material which has already been well summarised elsewhere, the authors concentrate on areas that are relatively new or possibly less generally well appreciated. So, under analysis, the focus is on models for network topologies and connectivity, and on wireless access. In the simulation section the focus is on techniques for scalable simulation for large-scale packet networks. Compared to the other two areas measurement is relatively new anyway, and more time is spent on motivation, techniques and some recently discovered limitations.

References

    1. 1)
      • Zegura, E., Calvert, K., Bhattacharjee, S.: `How to model an Internet network', Proc. IEEE INFOCOM The Conference on Computer Communications (IEEE, 1996), 2, p. 594–602.
    2. 2)
      • Amaradasa, V., Schormans, J.A.: `Accelerated simulation of a GPS scheduler using traffic aggregation', 4thInt. Working Conf., Performance Modelling and Evaluation of Heterogeneous Networks (HETNETs), 2006, Ilkley, Yorkshire, UK.
    3. 3)
      • H. Zhu , M. Li , I. Chlamtac , B. Prabhakaran . A survey of quality of service in IEEE 802.11 networks. IEEE Wireless Commun. , 6 - 14
    4. 4)
      • M. Faloutsos , P. Faloutsos , C. Faloutsos . On power–law relationships of the internet topology. Comput. Commun. Rev. , 251 - 262
    5. 5)
      • S. Zhou , R.J. Mondragón . Accurately modelling the Internet topology. Phys. Rev. E
    6. 6)
      • R. Chakravorty , S. Kattin , J. Crowcroft , I. Pratt . Flow aggregation for enhanced TCP over wide-area wireless. IEEE INFOCOM
    7. 7)
      • T. Bonald , M. May , J.-C. Bolot . Analytic evaluation of RED performance. IEEE INFOCOM , 1415 - 1424
    8. 8)
      • Y. Vardi . Network tomography: estimating source-destination traffic intensities from link data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. , 433 , 365 - 377
    9. 9)
      • Zhang, Y., Duffield, N., Paxson, V., Shenkar, S.: `On the constancy of Internet path properties', Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop ‘01, November 2001, San Francisco.
    10. 10)
      • Opnet Technologies, Inc. (2008), Opnet Modeler, [Online], Details available: http://www.opnet.com/.
    11. 11)
      • R. Guimera , A. Diaz-Guilera , F. Vega-Redondo , A. Cabrales , A. Arenas . Optimal network topologies for local search with congestion. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 24 , 248 - 701
    12. 12)
      • Schormans, J.A., Pitts, J.M.: `So you think you can measure IP QoS?', The 2nd IEE Telecommunications QoS Conference 2004, 2–3 March 2004, Savoy Place.
    13. 13)
      • M. Hasib , J. Schormans , T. Timotijevic . Accuracy of packet loss monitoring over networked CPE. IET Commun. , 3 , 507 - 513
    14. 14)
      • Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, K.P., Druschel, P., Bhattacharjee, B.: `Measurement and analysis of online social networks', Proc. 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conf. on Internet Measurement, 24–26 October 2007, San Diego, California, USA.
    15. 15)
      • J.W. Roberts . Traffic theory and the internet. IEEE Commun. Mag.
    16. 16)
      • Tangmunarunkit, H., Govindan, R., Jamin, S., Shenker, S., Willinger, W.: `Network topology generators: degree-based vs. structural', Proc. 2002 Conf. on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (ACM Press), p. 147–159, (DOI 10.1145/633025.633040).
    17. 17)
      • H. Fuks , A.T. Lawniczak , S. Volkov . Packet delay in data network models. ACM Trans. Modelling Comput. Simul. , 3 , 233 - 250
    18. 18)
      • T. Timotijevic , J.A. Schormans . Bandwidth overhead of probe technology guaranteeing QoS in packet networks. IEE Electronics Lett. , 10 , 816 - 818
    19. 19)
      • Garrett, M.W., Willinger, W.: `Analysis, modeling and generation of self-similar VBR video traffic', Proc SIGCOMM 1994, p. 269–280.
    20. 20)
      • Fiems, D., Walraevens, J., Bruneel, H.: ‘Performance of a partially shared priority buffer with correlated arrivals’. Book Series Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2007), ISSN 0302-9743 (Print) 1611-3349 (Online), vol. 4516/2007, ISBN 978-3-540-72989-1, pp. 582–593.
    21. 21)
      • L. Kleinrock . (1976) Queueing systems, volume 2.
    22. 22)
      • Zhou, S., Mondragon, R.J.: `Towards modelling the internet topology – the interactive growth model', 18thInternational Teletraffic Congress, September 2003, Berlin.
    23. 23)
      • Roughan, M.: `Fundamental bounds on the accuracy of network performance measurements', ACM SIGMETRICS'05, 6–10 June 2005, Banff, Canada.
    24. 24)
      • Andren, J., Hilding, M., Veitch, D.: `Understanding end-to-end internet traffic dynamics', Proc. Globecom'98, 1998, Sydney, Australia, p. 1118–1122.
    25. 25)
      • Bolot, J.: `End-to-end packet delay and loss behavior in the Internet', Proc. ACM SIGCOMM ‘93, September 1993, San Francisco.
    26. 26)
      • S. Lu , J.A. Schormans . A time-stepped approach for accelerated simulation of mobile ad-hoc networks. IET Commun , 5 , 609 - 620
    27. 27)
      • A. Kumar , D. Manjunath , J. Kuri . (2004) Communication networking – an analytical approach.
    28. 28)
      • G. Bianchi . Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function. IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun. , 3 , 535 - 547
    29. 29)
      • M. Crovella , B. Krishnamurthy . (2006) Internet measurement: infrastructure, traffic and applications.
    30. 30)
      • John, W., Tafvelin, S.: `Analysis of internet backbone traffic and header anomalies observed', ACM Internet Measurement Conf., 2007.
    31. 31)
      • R. Pastor-Satorras , A. Vespignani . (2004) Evolution and structure of the internet – a statistical physics approach.
    32. 32)
      • A.-L. Barabasi . The architecture of complexity – from network structure to human biology. IEEE Control Syst. Mag.
    33. 33)
      • http://www.caida.org/workshops/wide/0801/.
    34. 34)
      • M. Woolf , D. Arrowsmith , R. Mondragon , J.M. Pitts . Optimization and phase transition in a chaotic model of data traffic. Phys. Rev. E
    35. 35)
      • G. Siganos , M. Faloutsos , P. Faloutsos , C. Faloutsos . Power laws and the AS-level Internet topology. IEEE/ACM Trans.
    36. 36)
      • Winick, J., Jamin, S.: `Inet-2.0 internet topology generator', Tech. Report UM-CSE-TR-456-02, , Univ. Michigan, Ann Harbour.
    37. 37)
      • Huffaker, B., Plummer, D., Moore, D., Claffy, K.C.: `Topology discovery by active probing', Proc. IEEE Computer Society Symp. on Applications and the Internet (Saint) Workshops, 2002, Washington, DC.
    38. 38)
      • Reeve, Bilton and Holmes, Bross: ‘21CN networks and systems for BT in the 21st century’, IEE Commun. Engineer, Oct/Nov 2005.
    39. 39)
      • S. Floyd , V. Jacobson . Random early detection gateways for congestion avoidance. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking , 4 , 397 - 413
    40. 40)
      • W. Willinger , M.S. Taqqu , R. Sherman , D.V. Wilson . Self-similarity through high-variability: statistical analysis of EthernetLAN traffic at the source level. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking , 1 , 71 - 86
    41. 41)
      • Paxson, V.: `End-to-end internet packet dynamics', Proc. ACM SIGCOMM ‘97, September 1997, Cannes, France.
    42. 42)
      • Pásztor, A., Darryl Veitch, D.: `Active probing using packet quartets', Proc. 2nd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet measurement, 2002, Marseille, France, p. 293–305.
    43. 43)
      • F. Kuhl , J. Dahmann , R. Weatherly . (1999) Creating computer simulation systems: an introduction to the high level architecture.
    44. 44)
      • W.E. Leland , M.S. Taqqu , W. Willinger , D.V. Wilson . On the self-similar nature of ethernet traffic (extended version). IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking , 1 , 1 - 15
    45. 45)
      • A. Ma , J. Schormans , L. Cuthbert . Aggregation technique for networks with power law traffic and application to accelerated simulation. IEE Proc. Commun. , 3 , 177 - 183
    46. 46)
      • R. Pastor-Satorras , A. Vazquez , A. Vespignani . Dynamical and correlation properties of the Internet. Phys. Rev. Lett.
    47. 47)
      • Estan, G., Keys, K., Moore, D., Varghese, G.: `Building a better NetFlow', Proc. SIGCOMM ‘04, Porkland, Oregon.
    48. 48)
      • Yang, Q., Pitts, J.M.: `Guaranteeing enterprise VoIP QoS with novel approach to DiffServ AF configuration', IEEE Int. Communication Conf. (ICC'07), 24–28 June 2007, Glasgow, UK.
    49. 49)
      • P. Gevros , J. Crowcroft , P. Kirstein , S. Bhatti . Congestion control mechanisms and the best effort service model. IEEE Network , 3 , 16 - 26
    50. 50)
      • Shanlunov, S., Teitelbaum, B., Karp, A., Boote, J.W., Zekauskas, M.: ‘A one-way delay measurement protocol (OWAMP)’, Internet Draft, May 2003.
    51. 51)
      • Chang, H., Jamin, S., Willinger, W.: `What causal forces shape internet connectivity at the AS-level?', Technical Report CSE-475-03, 2003, EECS Dept., Univ. of Michigan.
    52. 52)
      • Polyzios, C.A., Purdy, K.H., Yang, P.-F., Shrader, D., Sinnreich, H., Menard, F., Schulzrinne H.: ‘From POTS to PANS: a commentary on the evolution to internet telephony’, IEEE Internet Comput., May/June 1999.
    53. 53)
      • http://www.emulab.net/.
    54. 54)
      • Riley, G.F.: `Large-scale network simulation: how big? how fast?', 11thIEEE/ACM Int. Symp. on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer Telecommunications Systems, 2003, MASCOTS 2003, 12–15 October 2003, p. 116–123.
    55. 55)
      • M. Roughan . A comparison of Poisson and uniform sampling for active measurements. IEEE Selected Areas Commun. , 12 , 2299 - 2312
    56. 56)
      • Padhye, J.: `Modelling TCP throughput: a simple model and its empirical validation', Proc. SIGCOMM'98.
    57. 57)
      • J.M. Pitts , J.A. Schormans . (2000) Introduction to IP and ATM design and performance.
    58. 58)
      • Rodrigues, F.A., Villas Boas, P.R., Travieso, G., Costa, L., Da, F.: ‘Seeking the best Internet model’, arXiv:0706.3225v1.
    59. 59)
      • D. Verma . (1999) Supporting service level agreements on IP networks.
    60. 60)
      • Cha, M., Kwak, H., Rodriguez, P., Ahn, Y., Moon, S.: `I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: analyzing the world's largest user generated content video system', Proc. 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conf. on Internet Measurement, 24–26 October 2007, San Diego, California, USA.
    61. 61)
      • A.H.I. Ma , J.A. Schormans . Fast, stable simulation of power-law packet traffic using concatenated acceleration techniques. IEE Proc. Commun. , 4 , 420 - 426
    62. 62)
      • Schormans, J.A., Timotijevic, T.: `Evaluating the accuracy of active measurement of delay and loss in packet networks', 6thIFIP/IEEE Int. Conf. on Management of Multimedia Networks and Services, September 2003, Belfast, Queens University.
    63. 63)
      • Cao, J., Ramanan, K.: `A Poisson limit for buffer overflow probabilities', Proc. INFOCOMM, 2002.
    64. 64)
      • D.A. Patterson , D.D. Clark , A. Karlin . (2001) Computer Science and Telecommunications Board Committee on Research Horizons in Networks – looking over the fence at networks: a neighbor's view of network research.
    65. 65)
      • The ns-3 project, [Online], Details available http://www.nsnam.org/.
    66. 66)
      • Moore, A., Hall, J., Kreibich, C., Harris, E., Pratt, I.: ‘Architecture of a network monitor’. Passive & Active Measurement Workshop 2003 (PAM2003), 2003.
    67. 67)
      • Riley, G., Ammar, M.: `Simulating large networks: how big is big enough?', Proc. First Int. Conf. on Grand Challenges for Modelling and Simulation, January 2002, San Antonio.
    68. 68)
      • N.G. Duffield . Network tomography of binary network performance characteristics. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory , 5373 - 5388
    69. 69)
      • P. Barford , J. Sommers . Comparing probe-based and router-based packet-loss measurement. IEEE Internet Comput. , 5 , 50 - 56
    70. 70)
      • Doar, M.: ‘A better model for generating test networks’. In ‘Communications: the key to global prosperity’. Proc. Global Telecommunications Conference, GLOBECOM ‘96, pp. 86–93 (DOI 10.1109/GLOCOM.1996.586131).
    71. 71)
      • T. Timotijevic , C.M. Leung , J.A. Schormans . Accuracy of measurement techniques supporting QoS in packet based Intranet and Extranet VPNs. IEE Proc. Communications Special Edition on VPNs and Broadband Technology , 1 , 89 - 94
    72. 72)
      • Oliveira, R., Pei, D., Willinger, W., Zhang, B., Zhang, L.: `In search of the elusive ground truth: the internet's AS-level connectivity structure', In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS'08, May 2008.
    73. 73)
      • Goldsman, D.: `Introduction to simulation', Proc. 2007 Winter Simulation Conf..
    74. 74)
      • W. Willinger , R. Govindan , S. Jamin , V. Paxson , S. Shenker . Scaling phenomena in the Internet: critically examining criticality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 2573 - 2580
    75. 75)
      • H. Fuks , A.T. Lawniczak . Performance of data networks with random links. Math. Comput. Simul. , 103 - 119
    76. 76)
      • C. Fraleigh , S. Moon , B. Lyles . Packet-level traffic measurements from the sprint IP backbone. IEEE Network , 6 , 6 - 16
    77. 77)
      • S.N. Dorogovtsev , J.F. Mendes . (2003) Evolution of networks: from biological nets to the internet and www.
    78. 78)
      • Lakhina, A., Crovella, M., Diot, C.: `Mining anomalies using traffic feature distributions', ACM SIGCOMM 2005, September 2005, Philadelphia.
    79. 79)
      • Pasztor, A., Veitch, D.: `A precision infrastructure for active probing', Proc. PAM2001 Workshop on Passive & Active Measurements, April 2001, Amsterdam.
    80. 80)
      • Sommers, J., Barford, P., Duffield, N., Ron, A.: `Improving accuracy in end to end packet loss measurements', SIGCOMM'05, , Philadelphia, USA.
    81. 81)
      • Bu, T., Towsley, D.: `On distinguishing between internet power law topology generators', Proc. INFOCOM 2002. Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE, 2002), 2, p. 638–647, (DOI 10.1109/INFCOM.2002.1019309).
    82. 82)
      • J.W. Roberts , V. Mocci , J. Virtamo . (1996) Broadband network teletraffic, final report of action COST 242.
    83. 83)
      • Sargent, R.: `Verification and validation of simulation models', Proc. 2007 Winter Simulation Conf..
    84. 84)
      • Baccelli, F., Machiraja, S., Veitch, D., Bolot, J.: `On optimal probing for delay and loss measurement', Proc. IMC'07, October 2007, San Diego, California.
    85. 85)
      • Liebeherr, J., Shroff, N. (Eds.): ‘NSF workshop on fundamental research in networking’, [Online], 2003, Available: http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~jorg/workshop1/.
    86. 86)
      • Krioukov, D., Chung, F., Claffy, K.C., Fomenkov, M., Vespignani, A., Willinger, W.: ‘The workshop on Internet topology (WIT) report’. ACM SIGCOMM'2007 Computer Communication Review (CCR) 37, 69–73. (http://www.caida.org/publications/papers/2006/wit/wit.pdf).
    87. 87)
      • Karagiannis, T., Broido, A., Brownlee, N., Claffy, K.C., Faloutsos, M.: `Is P2P dying or just hiding?', IEEE Globecom, Nov 2004, Dallas, TX.
    88. 88)
      • http://www.caida.org/projects/ditl/.
    89. 89)
      • K. Fukuda , H. Takayasu , M. Takayasu . Origin of critical behaviour in Ethernet traffic. Phys. A , 289 - 301
    90. 90)
      • Cha, M., Choudhury G., Yates J., Shaikh A., Moon S.: ‘2006 case study: resilient backbone network design for IPTV services’. Workshop on IPTV Services over WWW, 23 May 2006 (Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 2006).
    91. 91)
      • X. Fu , H. Schulzrinne , A. Badrer . NSIS: a new extensible IP signalling protocol suite. IEEE Commun. Mag.
    92. 92)
      • Sheluhin, O.I., Smolskiy, S., Osin, R.: ‘Self-similar processes in telecommunications’ (John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2007) [NS2-07] The Network Simulator – ns2 (ns-2.32 released 3 Sep 2007) [Online], Available http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns.
    93. 93)
    94. 94)
      • Filsfils, C., Ward, D.: ‘Measuring internet quality’, see http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac50/ac207/proceedings/MIQ.ppt#486,4, Application View (seen 05-02-2007).
    95. 95)
      • The e-model, a computational model for use in transmission planning. ITU-T Recommendation G.107. May 2000.
    96. 96)
      • C. Dovrolis , P. Ramanathan , D. Moore . Packet-dispersion techniques and a capacity-estimation methodology. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking , 6 , 963 - 977
    97. 97)
      • Svoboda, P., Karner, W., Rupp, M.: `Traffic analysis and modeling for world of warcraft', IEEE Int. Conf. on Commun., 24–28 June 2007.
    98. 98)
      • T. Maertens , J. Walraevens , H. Bruneel . A modified HOL priority scheduling discipline: performance analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. , 3 , 1168 - 1185
    99. 99)
      • Lu, S., Schormans, J.A.: `SSIM: a multi-resolution fluid traffic simulator for MANETs', 3rdInt. Conf. on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU2006), October 2006.
    100. 100)
      • Harper, P.J.: ‘IP traffic aggregation: headroom needed for QOS and application to TDM transport’. Paul Julian Harper Turin Networks, 1415 N McDowell Ave, Petaluma, CA 9495, USA. Email: [email protected] available from http://www.choicecomp.com/TrafficAggregation/IpAggregation.pdf.
    101. 101)
      • L. Zhao , Y.-C. Lai , K. Park , N. Ye . Onset of traffic congestion in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E
    102. 102)
      • Garvels, M.J.J., Kroese, D.P.: `A comparison of RESTART implementations', Simulation Conf. Proc., Winter, 13–16 December 1998, 1, p. 601–608.
    103. 103)
      • P. Holme . Edge overload breakdown in evolving networks. Phys. Rev. E
    104. 104)
      • M. Mathis , J. Semke , J. Mahdavi . The macroscopic behaviour of the TCP congestion avoidance algorithm. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. , 3
    105. 105)
      • Y. Zhang , M. Roughan , C. Lund , D.L. Donoho . Estimating point-to-point and point-to-multipoint traffic matrices: an information-theoretic approach. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking , 5 , 947 - 960
    106. 106)
      • Barford, P., Crovella, M.: `Generating representative web workloads for network and server performance evaluation', Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS ‘98, 5 May 1997.
    107. 107)
      • Andrew, L., Marcondes, C., Floyd, S.: `Towards a common TCP evaluation suite', Proceedings of International Workshop on Protocols for Fast Long-Distance Networks (PFLDnet), March 2008.
    108. 108)
      • M.E.J. Newman . Assortative mixing in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett.
    109. 109)
      • Alvarez-Hamelin, J.-I., Dall'Asta, L., Barrat, A., Vespignani, A.: ‘k-core decomposition: a tool for the visualization of large scale networks’, arXiv.org:cs/0504107. 2005.
    110. 110)
      • J.M. Pitts . Cell-rate modelling for accelerated simulation of ATM at the burst level. IEE Proc. Commun. , 6 , 379 - 385
    111. 111)
      • J.W. Roberts . (1992) Performance evaluation and design of multiservice networks.
    112. 112)
      • Law, A.M.: `Statistical analysis of simulation output data: the practical state of the art', PROC. 2007 Winter Simulation Conference.
    113. 113)
      • J. Heidemann , K. Mills , S. Kumar . Expanding confidence in network simulation. IEEE Network Mag. , 5 , 58 - 63
    114. 114)
      • Anerousis, N., Caceres, R., Duffield, N.: `Using the AT&T Labs PacketScope for internet measurements, design, performance analysis', AT&T Services and Infrastructure Performance Symp., November 1997.
    115. 115)
      • Sastry, N., Sollins, K., Crowcroft, J.: ‘Architecting citywide ubiquitous WiFi access’. The Sixth Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNETsVI), 2007.
    116. 116)
      • Mondragon, R.J.: ‘Topological modelling of large networks’, Philos. Trans. A, Roy. Soc., Lond., doi: 10/1098/rsta.2008.0008.
    117. 117)
      • I. Herman , G. Melancon , M.S. Marshall . Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: a survey. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics , 1 , 24 - 43
    118. 118)
      • J.M. Pitts , X. Wang , Q. Yang , J.A. Schormans . Excess-rate queueing theory for M/M/1/RED with application to VoIP QoS. Electron. Lett. , 20 , 1188 - 1189
    119. 119)
      • Floyd, S., Kohler, E.: `Internet research needs better models', Proc. HorNets-I, October 2002.
    120. 120)
      • K.-C. Leung , V.O.K. Li . Transmission control protocol (TCP) in wireless networks: issues, approaches, and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surveys , 4 , 64 - 79
    121. 121)
      • Liu, B., Figueiredo, D.R., Guo, Y., Kurose, J., Towsley, D.: ‘A study of networks simulation efficiency: fluid simulation vs. packet-level simulation’, INFOCOM 2001. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proc. IEEE, 2001, 3, pp. 1244–1253.
    122. 122)
      • H. Schulzrinne . The IETF internet telephony architecture and protocols. IEEE Network
    123. 123)
      • Shin, S., Schulzrinne, H.: ‘Experimental measurement of the capacity for VoIP traffic in IEEE 802.11 WLANs’. IEEE INFOCOM 2007.
    124. 124)
      • L. Breslau , D. Estrin , K. Fall , S. Floyd , J. Heidemann , A. Helmy , P. Huang , S. McCanne , K. Varadhan , Y. Xu , H. Yu . Advances in network simulation. Computer , 5 , 59 - 67
    125. 125)
      • Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA): http://www.caida.org/.
    126. 126)
      • Kho, W., Baset, S.A., Schulzrinne H.: ‘Skype relay calls: measurements and experiments’. IEEE INFOCOM 2008.
    127. 127)
      • S. Floyd , V. Paxson . Difficulties in simulating the Internet. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking , 4 , 392 - 403
    128. 128)
      • M.L. Freeman . A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry , 35 , 35 - 41
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2008.0111
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2008.0111
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address