Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Job partition and allocation using the prediction model in non-dedicated heterogeneous wireless network environments

Job partition and allocation using the prediction model in non-dedicated heterogeneous wireless network environments

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Adapting wireless devices to communicate within grid networks empower users. This makes deployment of a wide range of applications possible within appropriate limits, including intermittent network connectivity and non-dedicated heterogeneous system capacity. The performance prediction model is used to improve the performance of the mobile grid job scheduling algorithm (MG-JSA). The proposed algorithm predicts the response time for processing the distributed application in each mobile node, although considering wireless network environments and inherent non-dedicated heterogeneous system capacity. Using this prediction model, the algorithm partitions and allocates the distributed jobs to available mobile nodes for rapid job processing. The efficiency of the MG-JSA model is demonstrated by evaluating its performance.

References

    1. 1)
      • L. Gong , X.-H. Sun , E.F. Watson . Performance modeling and prediction of nondedicated network computing. IEEE Trans. Comput. , 9 , 1041 - 1055
    2. 2)
      • F. Berman , G. Fox , T. Hey . (2003) The grid: past, present, future’, Grid computing—making the global infrastructure a reality.
    3. 3)
      • T.-K. Kim , H.-J. Lim , T.-M. Chung . Service negotiation model for response time in distributed networks. Comput. Inform. , 395 - 405
    4. 4)
      • AKOGRIMO Integrated Project: http://www.akogrimo.org, accessed April 2008.
    5. 5)
      • Bruneo, D., Scarpa, M., Zaia, A., Puliafito, A.: `Communication paradigms for mobile grid users', 3rdInt. Symp. Cluster Computing and the Grid, May 2003, Tokyo, Japan.
    6. 6)
      • Satyanarayanan, M.: `Fundamental challenges in mobile computing', Proc. 15th Annual ACM Symp. Principles of Distributed Computing, 1996, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
    7. 7)
      • D.C. Marinescu , G.M. Marinescu , Y. Ji , L. Boloni . (2003) Ad hoc grids: communication and computing in a power constrained environment.
    8. 8)
      • SETI@home: http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu, accessed March 2001.
    9. 9)
      • Hwang, J., Aravamudham, P.: `Proxy-based middleware services for peer-to-peer computing in virtually clustered wireless grid networks', Int. Conf. Computer, Communication and Control Technologies (CCCT ‘03), July 2003, Orlando, Florida.
    10. 10)
      • Park, S.-M., Ko, Y.-B., Kim, J.-H.: `Disconnected operation service in mobile grid computing', Int. Conf. Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC ‘03), December 2003.
    11. 11)
      • Phan, T., Huang, L., Dulan, C.: `Challenge: integrating mobile wireless devices into the computational grid', MOBICOM 02, 23–26 September 2002, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
    12. 12)
      • Radhakrishnan, S., Rao, N.S.V., Racherla, G., Sekharan, C.N., Batsell, S.G.: `DST—a routing protocol for ad hoc networks using distributed spanning trees', IEEE Wirel. Commun. Netw. Conf., 1999, p. 100–104.
    13. 13)
      • Casanova, H., Obertelli, G., Berman, F., Wolski, R.: `The AppLeS parameter sweep template: user-level middleware for the grid', Proc. Super Computer 2000, November 2000.
    14. 14)
      • Foster, L.C., Imanitchi, A.: `On death, taxes and the convergence of peer-to-peer and grid computing', 2ndInt. Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2003.
    15. 15)
      • H.E. Xiaoshan , X.-H. Sun , G. von Laszewski . QoS guided min-min heuristic for grid task scheduling. J. Comput. Sci. Technol.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2008.0257
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2008.0257
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address