Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Performance evaluation of dynamic spectrum sharing for two wireless communication networks

Performance evaluation of dynamic spectrum sharing for two wireless communication networks

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Dynamic spectrum sharing has become an important approach to improve spectrum efficiency by exploiting traffic loads variations of multiple wireless networks when a radio band is shared. In this study, the authors present an effective centralised decision approach to deal with the problem regarding how a spectrum manager should periodically re-allocate the spectrum between two networks in a single cell, while maintaining both the call blocking and dropping probabilities in their acceptable levels, and improving the spectrum efficiency simultaneously. In the decision algorithm, a two-level model (a spectrum level model and a call level model) is used to characterise the dynamic spectrum sharing mechanism and network resource usage within the two networks. Performance analysis begins with an approximated Markov Chain analysis and an iterative approach. The authors then further validate the approximated numerical results with simulations. These numerical results demonstrate that the call blocking and dropping probabilities of each network employing dynamic spectrum sharing are much better maintained than those using a fixed allocation under heavy traffic load. The authors thus conclude that the dynamic spectrum sharing algorithm can maintain the quality of service (QoS) of each network while the effective spectrum utilisation is improved under a fluctuation traffic environment when the available spectrum is limited.

References

    1. 1)
      • Rodriguez, V., Moessner, K., Tafazolli, R.: `Market-driven dynamic spectrum allocation: optimal end-user pricing and admission control for CDMA', Proc. 14th IST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit, June 2005, Dresden, Germany.
    2. 2)
      • Z. Ji , R.K.-J. Liu . Dynamic spectrum sharing: a game theoretical overview. IEEE Commun. Mag. , 5 , 88 - 94
    3. 3)
      • Huschke, J., Leaves, P.: ‘Dynamic spectrum allocation algorithm including results of DSA performance simulations’. Information Society Technologies DRiVE Deliverable D09, 2003.
    4. 4)
      • Xie, H., Kuek, S.: `Priority handoff analysis', Proc. IEEE VTC-93, May 1993, Secaucus, NJ, USA, p. 855–858.
    5. 5)
      • Q.-A. Zeng , D.-P. Agrawal . Modeling and efficient handling of handoffs in integrated wireless mobile networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. , 6 , 1469 - 1478
    6. 6)
      • N. Bartolini . Handoff and optimal channel assignment in wireless networks. Mob. Netw. Appl. , 6 , 511 - 524
    7. 7)
      • R. Etkin , A. Parekh , D. Tse . Spectrum sharing for unlicensed bands. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , 3 , 517 - 528
    8. 8)
      • Buddhikot, M.M., Kolodzy, P., Miller, S., Ryan, K., Evans, J.: `DIMSUMnet: new directions in wireless networking using coordinated dynamic spectrum access', Proc. IEEE WoWMoM’05, June 2005, Taormina, Italy, p. 78–85.
    9. 9)
      • Rodriguez, V., Moessner, K., Tafazolli, R.: `Auction driven dynamic spectrum allocation: optimal bidding, pricing and service priorities for multi-rate, multi-class CDMA', Proc. 16th Annual IEEE Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC’05), September 2005, Berlin, Germany, p. 1850–1854.
    10. 10)
      • P. Leaves , K. Moessner , R. Tafazolli . Dynamic spectrum allocation in composite reconfigurable wireless networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. , 5 , 72 - 81
    11. 11)
      • Huang, J., Berry, R., Honing, M.-L.: `Auction-based spectrum sharing', ACM/Springer Mobile Networks and Applications, June 2006, p. 405–418.
    12. 12)
      • Buddhikot, M., Ryan, K.: `Spectrum management in coordinated dynamic spectrum access based cellular networks', Proc. IEEE DySPAN’05, November 2005, Baltimore, USA, p. 299–307.
    13. 13)
      • Chin, C.-M., Olafsson, S., VirginaS, B., Owusu, G.: `Radio resource management via spectrum trading', Proc. IEEE VTC 2008, May 2008, Singapore, p. 1781–1785.
    14. 14)
      • F. Akyildiz , W.-Y. Lee , M.C. Vuran , S. Mohanty . NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: a survey. Comput. Netw. , 2127 - 2159
    15. 15)
      • A. Law , W. Kelton . (1999) Simulation modeling and analysis.
    16. 16)
      • D. Thilakawardana , K. Moessner , R. Tafazolli . Darwinian approach for dynamic spectrum allocation in next generation systems. IET Commun. , 6 , 827 - 836
    17. 17)
      • Peng, C., Zheng, H., Zhao, B.-Y.: `Utilization and fairness in spectrum assignment for opportunistic spectrum access', ACM/Springer Mobile Networks and Applications, August 2006, p. 555–576.
    18. 18)
      • D. Niyato , E. Hossain . Market-equilibrium, competitive, and cooperative pricing for spectrum sharing in cognitive radio network: analysis and comparison. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , 11 , 4273 - 4283
    19. 19)
      • The DARPA neXt Generation (XG) Program, http://www.darpa.mil/sto/smallunitops/xg.html.
    20. 20)
      • M. Haddad , A. Hayar , M. Debbah . Spectral efficiency of spectrum-pooling systems. IET Commun. , 6 , 733 - 741
    21. 21)
      • V. Blaschke , C. Kloeck , J. Weiss , T. Renk , F.K. Jondral . Opportunistic WiMAX-GSM coexistence. IET Commun. , 6 , 837 - 845
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2009.0314
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2009.0314
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address