Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Performance analysis on carrier scheduling schemes in the long-term evolution-advanced system with carrier aggregation

Performance analysis on carrier scheduling schemes in the long-term evolution-advanced system with carrier aggregation

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Communications — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Carrier aggregation (CA) is one of the promising techniques for the further advancements of the third-generation (3G) long-term evolution (LTE) system, referred to as LTE-Advanced. When CA is applied, a well-designed carrier scheduling (CS) scheme is essential to the LTE-Advanced system. Joint user scheduling (JUS) and separated random user scheduling (SRUS) are two straightforward CS schemes. JUS is optimal in performance but with very high complexity, whereas SRUS is contrary. Consequently, the authors propose a novel CS scheme, termed as ‘separated burst-level scheduling’ (SBLS). In SBLS, the connected component carrier (CC) of one user can be changed in burst level, whereas in SRUS, it is fixed. Meanwhile, SBLS limits the users to receive from only one of the CCs simultaneously, which is the same as that in SRUS. In this way, SBLS is expected to achieve higher resource utilisation than SRUS but with acceptable complexity increase. There are two factors that are important to the performance of SBLS, namely the dispatching granularity and the dispatching policy. The authors' analysis is verified by system-level simulations. The simulation results also show that the resultant performance gain of SBLS over SRUS is notable and increasing dispatching granularity will quickly deteriorate the performance of SBLS.

References

    1. 1)
      • Wang, Y.Y., Pedersen, K.I., Mogensen, P.E.: `Carrier load balancing metods with bursty traffic for LTE-Advanced systems', Proc. IEEE 20th Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC2009), September 2009, Tokyo, Japan, p. 1–5.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • 3GPP TR 36.912 V9.3.0: ‘Feasibility study for further advancements for E-UTRA (LTE-Advanced)’, June 2010.
    4. 4)
      • Zhang, L., Liu, F., Huang, L.: `Traffic load balance methods in the LTE-Advanced system with carrier aggregation', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications, Circuits and Systems (ICCCAS2010), July 2010, Chengdu, China, p. 63–67.
    5. 5)
      • Chen, L., Chen, W.W., Zhang, X.: `Analysis and simulation for spectrum aggregation in LTE-Advanced system', Proc. IEEE 70th Vehicular Technologh Conf. on Fall (VTC2009-Fall), September 2009, Anchorage, AL, USA, p. 1–6.
    6. 6)
      • Meucci, F., Cabral, O., Velez, F.J.: `Spectrum aggregation with multi-band user allocation over two frequency bands', Proc. IEEE Mobile WiMAX Symp. (MWS2009), July 2009, Napa Valley, CA, USA, p. 81–86.
    7. 7)
      • Shi, S.S., Feng, C.Y., Guo, C.L.: `A resource schduling algorithm based on user grouping for LTE-Advanced system with carrier aggregation', Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Computer Network and Multimedia Technology (CNMT2009), December 2009, Wuhan, China, p. 1–4.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 3GPP TR 36.814 V9.0.0: ‘Further advancements for E-UTRA physical layer aspects’, March 2010.
    10. 10)
      • 3GPP TR 36.913 V9.0.0: ‘Requirement for further advancements for E-UTRA (LTE-Advanced)’, December 2009.
    11. 11)
      • Johansson, K., Bergman, J., Gerstenberger, M.: `Multi-carrier HSPA evolution', Proc. IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conf. on Spring (VTC2009-Spring), April 2009, Barcelonal, Spain, p. 1–5.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • 3GPP TR 25.825 V1.0.0: ‘Dual-cell HSDPA operation’, May 2008.
    14. 14)
      • Tripathi, N.D., Sharma, S.: `Dynamic load balancing in a CDMA system with multiple carriers', Proc. IEEE 54th Vehicular Technology Conf. on Fall (VTC2001-Fall), September 2001, Atlantic City, NJ, USA, p. 1010–1014.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 3GPP TR 36.211 V8.8.0: ‘E-UTRA physical channel and modulation’, September 2009.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • He, A.: `Peformance compariosn of load balancing methods in multiple carier CDMA systems', Proc. IEEE 11th Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC2000), September 2000, London, England, p. 113–118.
    19. 19)
      • Song, J., Kim, J.C., Oh, S.: `Performance analysis of channel assignment methods for multiple carrier CDMA cellular systems', Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC1999), May 1999, Houseton, TX, USA, p. 10–14.
    20. 20)
      • Zhang, L., Wang, Y.Y., Huang, L.: `Qos performance analysis on carrier aggregation based LTE-A systems', Proc. IET Int. Communication Conf. on Wireless, Mobile and Computing (CCWMC2009), December 2009, Shanghai, China, p. 253–256.
    21. 21)
      • 3GPP TR 36.815 V9.1.0: ‘Further advancements for E-UTRA LTE-Advanced feasibility studies in RAN WG4’, June 2010.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2010.0300
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-com.2010.0300
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address