Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Dynamic aspect mining

Dynamic aspect mining

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Software — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Legacy systems often contain several crosscutting concerns that could potentially benefit from an aspect-oriented programming implementation. In this paper, we focus on the problem of aspect identification in existing code. The main idea is that use-cases can be defined in order to separate the base logics from the crosscutting concerns to be aspectised. The relationship between the execution traces associated with the use-cases and the executed computational units (class methods) is analysed through concept analysis. The results obtained on some case studies are discussed in the paper.

References

    1. 1)
      • I. Jacobson . Use cases and aspects – working seamlessly together. J. Object Technol. , 4 , 7 - 28
    2. 2)
      • van Deursen, A., Marin, M., Moonen, L.: `Aspect mining and refactoring', Proc. First Int. Workshop on Refactoring: Achievements, Challenges, Effects (REFACE), with WCRE, November 2003, Waterloo, Canada.
    3. 3)
      • Bruntink, M., van Deursen, A., Tourwé, T., van Engelen, R.: `An evaluation of clone detection techniques for identifying crosscutting concerns', Proc. Int. Conf. Software Maintenance (ICSM), September 2004, p. 200–209.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • Shepherd, D., Pollock, L.: `Interfaces, aspects and views', Linking Aspect Technology and Evolution (LATE) Workshop, 2005.
    6. 6)
      • B. Nora , G. Said , A. Fadila . A comparative classification of aspect mining approaches. J. Comput. Sci. , 4 , 322 - 325
    7. 7)
      • Robillard, M.P., Murphy, G.C.: `Concern graphs: finding and describing concerns using structural program dependencies', Proc. 24th Int. Conf. Software Engineering (ICSE), May 2002, Orlando, FL, USA, p. 406–416.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • N. Wilde , M.C. Scully . Software reconnaissance: mapping program features to code. J. Softw. Maint.: Res. Pract. , 49 - 62
    11. 11)
      • Dekel, U., Gil, Y.: `Revealing class structure with concept lattices', Proc. Working Conf. Reverse Engineering (WCRE), November 2003, Victoria, BC, Canada, p. 353–365.
    12. 12)
      • Tourwe, T., Mens, K.: `Mining aspectual views using formal concept analysis', Proc. Fourth IEEE Int. Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM 2004), September 2004, Chicago, IL, USA, p. 97–106.
    13. 13)
      • Loughran, N., Rashid, A.: `Mining aspects', Proc. Workshop on Early Aspects: Aspect-Oriented Requirements Engineering and Architecture Design (with AOSD), April 2002, Enschede, The Netherlands.
    14. 14)
      • Tonella, P., Ceccato, M.: `Aspect mining through the formal concept analysis of execution traces', Proc. 11th Working Conf. Reverse Engineering (WCRE), November 2004, p. 112–121.
    15. 15)
      • Marin, M., van Deursen, A., Moonen, L.: `Identifying aspects using fan-in analysis', Proc. 11th IEEE Working Conf. Reverse Engineering (WCRE 2004), November 2004, Delft, The Netherlands, p. 132–141.
    16. 16)
      • Rashid, A., Moreira, A.M.D., Araújo, J.: `Modularisation and composition of aspectual requirements', Proc. Second Int. Conf. Aspect-Oriented Software Development (AOSD), March 2003, Boston, MA, USA, p. 11–20.
    17. 17)
      • G. Snelting , F. Tip . Reengineering class hierarchies using concept analysis. ACM Trans. Programming Lang. Syst. , 3 , 540 - 582
    18. 18)
      • Shepherd, D., Tourwé, T., Pollock, L.: `Using language clues to discover crosscutting concerns', Workshop on the Modeling and Analysis of Concerns, 2005.
    19. 19)
      • I. Kiselev . (2002) Aspect-oriented programming with AspectJ.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • Al-Ekram, R., Kontogiannis, K.: `Source code modularization using lattice of concept slices', Proc. Eighth European Conf. Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2004), March 2004, Tampere, Finland, p. 195–203.
    22. 22)
      • B. Ganter , R. Wille . (1996) Formal concept analysis.
    23. 23)
      • Monteiro, M.P., Fernandes, J.M.: `Towards a catalog of aspect-oriented refactorings', Proc. fourth Int. Conf. Aspect-Oriented Software Development (AOSD), March 2005, p. 111–122.
    24. 24)
      • Gybels, K., Kellens, A.: `Experiences with identifying aspects in Smalltalk using ‘unique methods', Workshop on Linking Aspect Technology and Evolution, 2005.
    25. 25)
      • Griswold, W.G., Yuan, J.J., Kato, Y.: `Exploiting the map metaphor in a tool for software evolution', Proc. 2001 Int. Conf. Software Engineering (ICSE), March 2001, Toronto, Canada, p. 265–274.
    26. 26)
      • Shepherd, D., Gibson, E., Pollock, L.: `Design and evaluation of an automated aspect mining tool', Int. Conf. Software Engineering Research and Practice, April 2004.
    27. 27)
      • He, L., Bai, H., Zhang, J., Hu, C.Q.: `Amuca algorithm for aspect mining', Proc. Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), 2005.
    28. 28)
      • Borba, P., Soares, S.: `Refactoring and code generation tools for AspectJ', Proc. Workshop on Tools for Aspect-Oriented Software Development (with OOPSLA), November 2002, Seattle, WA, USA.
    29. 29)
      • A. Kellens , K. Mens , P. Tonella . A survey of automated code-level aspect mining techniques. Trans. Aspect Oriented Softw. Dev. , 145 - 164
    30. 30)
      • M. Fowler . (1999) Refactoring: improving the design of existing code.
    31. 31)
      • Janzen, D., Dc Volder, K.: `Navigating and querying code without getting lost', Proc. Second Int. Conf. Aspect- Oriented Software Development (AOSD), March 2003, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, p. 178–187.
    32. 32)
      • T. Eisenbarth , R. Koschke , D. Simon . Locating features in source code. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. , 3 , 195 - 209
    33. 33)
      • Robillard, M.P., Weigand-Warr, F.: `Concernmapper: simple view-based separation of scattered concerns', Eclipse'05: Proc. 2005 OOPSLA Workshop on Eclipse Technology eXchange, 2005, New York, NY, USA, p. 65–69.
    34. 34)
      • Hannemann, J., Kiczales, G.: `Overcoming the prevalent decomposition of legacy code', Proc. Workshop on Advanced Separation of Concerns at the Int. Conf. Software Engineering (ICSE), 2001, Toronto, Canada.
    35. 35)
      • Harman, M., Gold, N., Hierons, R.M., Binkley, D.: `Code extraction algorithms which unify slicing and concept assignment', Proc. ninth Working Conf. Reverse Engineering (WCRE 2002), November 2002, Richmond, VA, USA, p. 11–21.
    36. 36)
      • Breu, S., Krinke, J.: `Aspect mining using event traces', Proc. of Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2004), September 2004, Linz, Austria, p. 310–315.
    37. 37)
      • Kiczales, G., Lamping, J., Mendhekar, A.: `Aspect oriented programming', Proc. 11th European Conf. Object Oriented Programming (ECOOP), Springer-Verlag, p. 220–242, 1997 (LNCS, 1241.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-sen.2008.0108
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-sen.2008.0108
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address