Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Toward measuring potential coupling

Toward measuring potential coupling

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
Software Engineering Journal — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Coupling measures the strength of connection between two modules and is defined for modules that share data or control connections. Other types of connections are possible. Among these are sharing of types, sharing of coding standards and sharing an environment. This work deals with the potential coupling between a program and other modules in the environment. The importance of this type of coupling stems from its prevalence in software reuse. Potential coupling is not defined directly like the original coupling types. Instead, this work develops bounds for the sum of all coupling in the program and uses it to define the measure of design density and define potential coupling analytically.

References

    1. 1)
      • W.F. Clocksin , C.S. Mellish . (1981) , Programming in Prolog.
    2. 2)
      • (1983) , Reference manual for the ADA programming language.
    3. 3)
      • S.D. Litvinchouk , A.S. Matsumoto . Design of Ada systems yielding reusable components: an approach using structured algebraic specifications. IEEE Trans. , 5 , 544 - 551
    4. 4)
      • D.N. Card , W.W. Agresti . Measuring software design complexity. J. Syst. Soft. , 185 - 197
    5. 5)
      • A. Goldberg , D. Robson . (1983) , Smalltalk-80: the language and its implementation.
    6. 6)
      • T.J. McCabe . A complexity measure. IEEE Trans , 308 - 320
    7. 7)
      • T.J. Biggerstaff , A.J. Perlis . (1989) , Software reusability.
    8. 8)
      • D.A. Troy , S.H. Zweben . Measuring the quality of structured design. J. Syst. Softw. , 113 - 120
    9. 9)
      • G.J. Myers . (1975) , Reliable software through composite design.
    10. 10)
      • W.P. Stevens , G.J. Myers , L.L. Constantine . Structured design. IBM Syst. J. , 2 , 115 - 139
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/sej.1994.0011
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/sej.1994.0011
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address