Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2332-5843
Leveraging Novel Clinical Decision Support to Improve Preferred Language Documentation in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Funding None.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25a8a/25a8a548c1a83c2a714d9b4b1907e8862759a606" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08db5/08db57a7f429f142af4c84d32c123f27e2525e06" alt="Zoom Image"
Abstract
Background Recognition of the patient and family's diverse backgrounds and language preference is critical for communicating effectively. In our hospital's electronic health record, a patient or family's identified language for communication is documented in a discrete field known as “preferred language.” This field serves as an interdepartmental method to identify patients with a non-English preferred language, creating a bolded banner for non-English speakers easily identifiable by health care professionals. Despite the importance of documenting preferred language to facilitate equitable care, this field is often blank.
Objectives Using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement, our team sought to increase preferred language documentation within the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from a baseline of 74% in September 2021 to above 90% within 6 months.
Methods A multidisciplinary team was assembled to address preferred language documentation. Our team incorporated guidance regarding preferred language documentation into a novel clinical decision support (CDS) tool aimed at addressing various safety and quality measures within the NICU. Our primary outcome metric was documentation of family's preferred language. Process measures included overall compliance with the CDS tool. A secondary outcome was the assessment of preferred language documentation accuracy.
Results The average rate of preferred language documentation increased from a baseline of 74 to 92% within 6 months and is currently sustained at 96%. Moreover, our follow-up assessments found that 100% of a random sample of contacted patients (n = 88) had their language preferences documented correctly. Overall compliance with the CDS tool remained at 85% throughout the project.
Conclusion Using a quality improvement framework coupled with a CDS initiative, our team was able to successfully and accurately improve preferred language documentation in our NICU. Future projects include strategies for more equitable care for patients with non-English preferences such as improved interpreter usage and discharge instructions in their preferred language.
Keywords
clinical decision support - preferred language - health care systems electronic health record - neonatalProtection of Human and Animal Subjects
The study was conducted under local institutional standards for quality improvement initiatives and therefore institutional review boards approval was not needed.
Publication History
Received: 05 October 2023
Accepted: 22 May 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
24 May 2024
Article published online:
31 July 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany