Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

FACTA: a text search engine for finding associated biomedical concepts.

Author information

Affiliations

  • 1. School of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
      Authors
    • Tsuruoka Y 1
    (1 author)

ORCIDs linked to this article

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 04 Sep 2008, 24(21):2559-2560
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn469 PMID: 18772154 PMCID: PMC2572701

Articles in the Open Access Subset are available under a Creative Commons license. This means they are free to read, and that reuse is permitted under certain circumstances. There are six different Creative Commons licenses available, see the copyright license for this article to understand what type of reuse is permitted.
Free full text in Europe PMC

Abstract 

Unlabelled

FACTA is a text search engine for MEDLINE abstracts, which is designed particularly to help users browse biomedical concepts (e.g. genes/proteins, diseases, enzymes and chemical compounds) appearing in the documents retrieved by the query. The concepts are presented to the user in a tabular format and ranked based on the co-occurrence statistics. Unlike existing systems that provide similar functionality, FACTA pre-indexes not only the words but also the concepts mentioned in the documents, which enables the user to issue a flexible query (e.g. free keywords or Boolean combinations of keywords/concepts) and receive the results immediately even when the number of the documents that match the query is very large. The user can also view snippets from MEDLINE to get textual evidence of associations between the query terms and the concepts. The concept IDs and their names/synonyms for building the indexes were collected from several biomedical databases and thesauri, such as UniProt, BioThesaurus, UMLS, KEGG and DrugBank.

Availability

The system is available at http://www.nactem.ac.uk/software/facta/

Free full text 

Logo of bioinfoLink to Publisher's site
Bioinformatics. 2008 Nov 1; 24(21): 2559–2560.
PMCID: PMC2572701
PMID: 18772154

FACTA: a text search engine for finding associated biomedical concepts

Yoshimasa Tsuruoka,1,2,* Jun'ichi Tsujii,1,2,3 and Sophia Ananiadou1,2
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Abstract

Summary: FACTA is a text search engine for MEDLINE abstracts, which is designed particularly to help users browse biomedical concepts (e.g. genes/proteins, diseases, enzymes and chemical compounds) appearing in the documents retrieved by the query. The concepts are presented to the user in a tabular format and ranked based on the co-occurrence statistics. Unlike existing systems that provide similar functionality, FACTA pre-indexes not only the words but also the concepts mentioned in the documents, which enables the user to issue a flexible query (e.g. free keywords or Boolean combinations of keywords/concepts) and receive the results immediately even when the number of the documents that match the query is very large. The user can also view snippets from MEDLINE to get textual evidence of associations between the query terms and the concepts. The concept IDs and their names/synonyms for building the indexes were collected from several biomedical databases and thesauri, such as UniProt, BioThesaurus, UMLS, KEGG and DrugBank.

Availability: The system is available at http://www.nactem.ac.uk/software/facta/

Contact: ku.ca.retsehcnam@akourust.asamihsoy

1 INTRODUCTION

Information about pairwise association between biomedical concepts, such as genes, proteins, diseases and chemical compounds constitutes an important part of biomedical knowledge.1 It is common for a researcher to need answers to questions like ‘What diseases are relevant to a particular gene?’ or ‘What chemical compounds are relevant to a particular disease?’ Text mining complements biomedical databases by providing researchers with a convenient way to find such information from the literature.

There are a number of web-based text mining applications which can be used for this purpose. EBIMed (Rebholz-Schuhmann et al., 2007) receives a PubMed-style query from the user and analyzes the matched documents to recognize protein/gene names, GO annotations, drugs and species mentioned. Frequently occurring concepts are shown in a table, and the user can view the sentences corresponding to the associations. PolySearch (Cheng et al., 2008) can produce a list of concepts which are relevant to the user's query by analyzing multiple information sources including PubMed, OMIM, DrugBank and Swiss-Prot. It covers many types of biomedical concepts including diseases, genes/proteins, drugs, metabolites, SNPs, pathways and tissues. Systems that provide similar functionality include XplorMed (Perez-Iratxeta et al., 2003), MedlineR (Lin et al., 2004), LitMiner (Maier et al., 2005) and Anii (Jelier et al., 2008).

Although these applications are useful in exploring such information in the literature, not many of them provide real-time responses—the users often have to wait for several minutes (or even hours) before they receive the results. Some of the systems provide reasonably quick responses by limiting the number of documents to be analyzed to a very small number (e.g. 500 abstracts), but such limitation leads to a significant deterioration of the coverage. LitMiner and Anii are exceptions in that they can return the result immediately, presumably thanks to pre-computed association statistics between the concepts. However, they do not accept a flexible query (e.g. free keywords or Boolean combinations of keywords/concepts), hence the concepts that can be specified by the user's query are limited to predefined ones.

To complement existing applications, we have developed FACTA, which is a text search engine for browsing biomedical concepts that are potentially relevant to a query. The distinct advantage of FACTA is that it delivers real-time responses while being able to accept flexible queries. This is achieved by online computation of association statistics—FACTA analyzes the documents retrieved by the query dynamically, using pre-indexed words and concepts.

2 SOFTWARE FEATURES

FACTA receives a query from the user as the input. A query can be a word (e.g. ‘p53’), a concept ID (e.g. ‘UNIPROT:P04637’), or a combination of these [e.g. ‘(UNIPROT:P04637 AND (lung OR gastric))’]. The system then retrieves all the documents that match the query from MEDLINE using word/concept indexes. The concepts contained in the documents are then counted and ranked according to their relevance to the query. The results are presented to the user in a tabular format.

Figure 1 shows an example of the search result. For the input query ‘apoptosis AND blood’, the system retrieved 7734 documents from MEDLINE in 0.04 s. The relevant concepts of six categories are displayed in a table and ranked by their frequencies. The document icon next to each concept name in the table allows the user to view snippets from MEDLINE and see textual evidence of the association. The user can also invoke another search by clicking a concept name in the table. This allows the user to explore associations between many different concepts in a highly interactive manner.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is btn469f1.jpg

A screenshot of FACTA search results.

2.1 Indexing

FACTA's real-time responses to the queries are made possible by the use of its own indexing scheme and implementation of the analysis engines in C++. It uses two indexes built offline—one for the words and the other for the concepts. Both indexes are stored in memory to achieve quick responses, while the actual sentences of MEDLINE abstracts are stored on external storage. The system runs on a generic Linux server with 2.2 GHz AMD Opteron processors and 16 GB memory.

Currently, FACTA covers six categories of biomedical concepts: human genes/proteins, diseases, symptoms, drugs, enzymes and chemical compounds. The concepts appearing in the documents are recognized by dictionary matching. In total, 80 260 unique concepts are indexed. We used UniProt accession numbers as the concept IDs for genes/proteins and collected their names and synonyms from BioThesaurus (Liu et al., 2006). We used UMLS (Humphreys and Lindberg, 1989) for diseases and symptoms. The concept IDs and names for drugs, enzymes and chemical compounds were collected from several databases including HMDB, KEGG and DrugBank.

Ambiguity causes problems in indexing. For example, the term ‘collapse’ is not necessarily used as a symptom name in the documents that produced the results shown in Figure 1, so ideally such occurrences should be disambiguated using the context and excluded from the counting for the category. There is also intra-category ambiguity, e.g. some protein synonyms can be mapped to multiple gene/protein IDs. These problems are currently not addressed in FACTA.

2.2 Ranking

Since the number of the concepts contained in the documents is usually very large, it is important that the concepts are properly ranked when presented to the user. Although frequencies are normally a good indicator of the relevance of a concept, they tend to overestimate the importance of common concepts. FACTA can also rank the concepts by using pointwise mutual information, which is defined as log p(x, y)/(p(x)p(y)), where p(x) is the proportion of the documents that match the query, p(y) is the proportion of the documents that contain the concept, and p(x, y) is the proportion of the documents that match the query and contain the concept. Pointwise mutual information gives an indication of how much more the query and concept co-occur than we expect by chance. For example, if their occurrences are completely independent (i.e. p(x, y)=p(x)p(y)), the measure gives a value of zero.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The research team is hosted by the JISC/BBSRC/EPSRC sponsored National Centre for Text Mining.

Funding: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (grant code BB/E004431/1).

Conflict of Interest: none declared.

Footnotes

1In this article, a biomedical concept refers to a conceptual entity which is normally grounded to a record in a biomedical database. In text, the same concept (e.g. UniProt:O00203) may be represented by different terms (e.g. ‘AP-3 complex subunit beta-1’ or ‘Beta3A-adaptin’). Note also that the same term may represent different concepts depending on the context, although this problem is currently not resolved in FACTA.

REFERENCES

  • Cheng D, et al. PolySearch: a web-based text mining system for extracting relationships between human diseases, genes, mutations, drugs and metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W399–W405. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB. Building the unified medical language system. Proceedings of the 13th SCAMC. 1989:475–480. [Google Scholar]
  • Jelier R, et al. Anni 2.0: a multipurpose text-mining tool for the life sciences. Genome Biol. 2008;9 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin SM, et al. MedlineR: an open source library in R for Medline literature data mining. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:3659–3661. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu H, et al. BioThesaurus: a web-based thesaurus of protein and gene names. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:103–105. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Maier H, et al. LitMiner and WikiGene: identifying problem-related key players of gene regulation using publication abstracts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W779–W782. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Perez-Iratxeta C, et al. Update on XplorMed: a web server for exploring scientific literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3866–3868. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Rebholz-Schuhmann D, et al. EBIMed–text crunching to gather facts for proteins from MEDLINE. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:e237–e244. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Bioinformatics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

Full text links 

Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn469

Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc2572701Unpaywall

Free after 12 months at bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org
http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/24/21/2559

Free to read at bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org
http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/24/21/2559

Citations & impact 

Impact metrics

67
Citations
Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/2896066
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/2896066

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn469

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
0
104
0

Article citations

Go to all (67) article citations

Other citations

Data 

Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

BioStudies: supplemental material and supporting data

Genes & Proteins (2)

Similar Articles 

To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.

Funding 

Funders who supported this work.

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (1)