|
For Full-Text PDF, please login, if you are a member of IEICE,
or go to Pay Per View on menu list, if you are a nonmember of IEICE.
|
Analysis of Symmetric Cancellation Coding for OFDM over a Multi-Path Rayleigh Fading Channel
Abdullah S. ALARAIMI Takeshi HASHIMOTO
Publication
IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences
Vol.E90-A
No.9
pp.1956-1964 Publication Date: 2007/09/01 Online ISSN: 1745-1337
DOI: 10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.9.1956 Print ISSN: 0916-8508 Type of Manuscript: PAPER Category: Communication Theory and Signals Keyword: symmetric cancellation coding (SCC), OFDM, inter-carrier interference (ICI), time-varying (fast) Rayleigh fading, peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR),
Full Text: PDF(596.8KB)>>
Summary:
Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems for mobile applications suffer from inter-carrier-interference (ICI) due to frequency offset and to time-variation of the channels and from high peak-to-average-power ratio (PAPR). In this paper, we revisit symmetric cancellation coding (SCC) proposed by Sathananthan et al. and compare the effectiveness of SCC with a fixed subtraction combining and the well-known polynomial cancellation coding (PCC) over Rayleigh fading channels with Doppler spread in terms of the signal-to-interference plus noise power ratio (SINR) and bit-error-rate (BER). We also compare SCC with subtraction combining and SCC of Sathananthan et al. with maximum ratio combining (MRC). Our results show that SCC-OFDM with subtraction combining gives higher SINR than PCC-OFDM over the flat Rayleigh fading channel and that this superiority is not maintained under multi-path induced frequency-selective fading unless diversity combining is used. A simulation result shows, however, that SCC-OFDM with subtraction combining may perform better than PCC-OFDM for a certain range of Doppler spread when differential modulation is employed. Finally, we also demonstrate that the SCC-OFDM signal has less PAPR compared to the normal OFDM and PCC-OFDM and hence may be more practical.
|
open access publishing via
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|