To read this content please select one of the options below:

Comparative innovative business strategies of major players in cosmetic industry

Sameer Kumar (College of Business, University of St Thomas, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA)
Cindy Massie (College of Business, University of St Thomas, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA)
Michelle D. Dumonceaux (College of Business, University of St Thomas, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA)

Industrial Management & Data Systems

ISSN: 0263-5577

Article publication date: 1 March 2006

48473

Abstract

Purpose

The cosmetic industry is a very lucrative, innovative, and fast paced industry where product innovation is the key to success. The purpose of this paper is to present a detailed analytical (qualitative) study of cosmetic industry in the global marketplace with a focus on the four market leaders in this industry relative to their business and innovation strategies.

Design/methodology/approach

Business analyses include Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT), Porter's value chain and five forces, and financial applied to the four industry leaders.

Findings

Each of these cosmetic companies is unique. They each offer something different to the industry; selling method, marketing strategy, product line, and distribution channel.

Practical implications

The industry trends indicate that the future of cosmetics may move towards more joint ventures between drug companies, cosmetic companies and nutritional/food companies as cosmetic companies look for new ways to be innovative.

Originality/value

The research provides an in‐depth business analyses of cosmetic industry using SWOT, Porter's value chain and five forces and financial with results obtained that are generalizable to the entire cosmetic industry. Projections on the future of cosmetic industry are also presented.

Keywords

Citation

Kumar, S., Massie, C. and Dumonceaux, M.D. (2006), "Comparative innovative business strategies of major players in cosmetic industry", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 106 No. 3, pp. 285-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570610653461

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles