To read this content please select one of the options below:

RFPs: a necessary evil or indispensable tool?

Philip Calvert (School of Information Management Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand)
Marion Read (Bay of Plenty Polytechnic Library, Tauranga, New Zealand)

The Electronic Library

ISSN: 0264-0473

Article publication date: 1 September 2006

1508

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to assess attitudes amongst librarians and system vendors towards the use of the Request for Proposal (RFP) process for selecting a library management system; and to use the results as the basis of recommendations for best practice.

Design/methodology/approach

A focus group of librarians and a focus group of system vendors were asked open‐ended questions. Similar groups answered quantitative questions through an electronic survey.

Findings

Librarians and vendors both found some value in the RFP process provided it was done well.

Practical implications

Best practice is recommended in three aspects of the RFP process: communication, preparation, and documentation.

Originality/value

No previous research has assessed attitudes to the RFP process amongst librarians and vendors, and compared the results.

Keywords

Citation

Calvert, P. and Read, M. (2006), "RFPs: a necessary evil or indispensable tool?", The Electronic Library, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 649-661. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470610707259

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles