To read this content please select one of the options below:

Public agencies and environmental risk: Organizing knowledge in a democratic context

Doug Mercer (Research Faculty at the University of Washington.)
Thomas Leschine (Professor at the School of Marine Affairs, University of Washington.)
Christina H. Drew (Research Scientist at the Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington.)
William Griffith (Research Scientist at the Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington.)
Timothy Nyerges (Professor of Geography at University of Washington.)

Journal of Knowledge Management

ISSN: 1367-3270

Article publication date: 1 April 2005

2427

Abstract

Purpose

To derive from the environmental risk and knowledge management literatures a model that integrates organizational form, democratic vision and epistemological needs of public agencies responsible for addressing environmental risks. To analyze the knowledge management practices of the United States Department of Energy (USDOE) that is responsible for cleaning up landscapes contaminated by 50 years of plutonium production.

Design/methodology/approach

The model was used as a framework for a case study analysis of the USDOE knowledge management practices.

Findings

Conceptual: a vision of democracy and an understanding of the type of knowledge process can facilitate organizational constancy. Organizational forms should be matched to knowledge process and democratic vision. Empirical: USDOE has behaved erratically in addressing environmental risks viewed through this model of knowledge management.

Research limitations/implications

The model idealizes democratic visions, epistemological processes and organizational forms. Care should be taken in making predictions for the success or failure of an organizational approach based solely on this model.

Practical implications

Practically, the model aids scholars in making connections between knowledge management and public sector environmental risk management literatures; and provides managers with a systematic framework for relating democratic context knowledge production processes to particular organization forms. Use of this model particularly during agency restructuring may facilitate resolving environmental risks though improving organizational legitimacy, constancy, and knowledge generation capacity.

Originality/value

This is a first attempt at integrating two related but so‐far disconnected literatures (environmental risk management and knowledge management).

Keywords

Citation

Mercer, D., Leschine, T., Drew, C.H., Griffith, W. and Nyerges, T. (2005), "Public agencies and environmental risk: Organizing knowledge in a democratic context", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510590272

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles