To read this content please select one of the options below:

Performance evaluation and comparison of the five most used search engines in retrieving web resources

Sanjib K. Deka (Central Library, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, India)
Narendra Lahkar (Department of Library and Information Science, Gauhati University, Guwahati, India)

Online Information Review

ISSN: 1468-4527

Article publication date: 28 September 2010

1970

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the paper is to evaluate the performance and efficiency of the five most used search engines, i.e. Google, Yahoo!, Live, Ask, and AOL, in retrieving internet resources at specific points of time using a large number of complex queries.

Design/methodology/approach

In order to examine the performance of the five search engines, five sets of experiments were conducted using 50 complex queries within two different time frames. The data were evaluated using Excel and SPSS software.

Findings

The paper results highlight the fact that different web search engines, which use different technology to find and present web information, yield different first page search results. The overall analysis of the findings of different measures reveals that Google has a significantly higher rate of performance in retrieving web resources as compared with the other four search engines. Yahoo! is the second best in terms of retrieval performance. The other three search engines did not performed satisfactorily compared with Google and Yahoo!

Originality/value

The paper will provide important insight into the effectiveness of major search engines and their ability to retrieve relevant internet resources. This paper has produced key findings that are important for all web search engine users and researchers, and the web industry. The findings will also assist search companies to improve their services.

Keywords

Citation

Deka, S.K. and Lahkar, N. (2010), "Performance evaluation and comparison of the five most used search engines in retrieving web resources", Online Information Review, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 757-771. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011084609

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles