Hyper-heuristics are high level search methodologies that operate over a set of heuristics which operate directly on the problem domain. In one of the hyper-heuristic frameworks, the goal is automating the process of selecting a human-designed low level heuristic at each step to construct a solution for a given problem. Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSP) are well know NP complete problems. In this study, behaviours of two variable ordering heuristics Max-Conflicts (MXC) and Saturation Degree (SD) with respect to various combinations of constraint density and tightness values are investigated in depth over a set of random CSP instances. The empirical results show that the performance of these two heuristics are somewhat complementary and they vary for changing constraint density and tightness value pairs. The outcome is used to design three hyper-heuristics using MXC and SD as low level heuristics to construct a solution for unseen CSP instances. It has been observed that these hyper-heuristics improve the performance of individual low level heuristics even further in terms of mean consistency checks for some CSP instances.