Comparison of Cough, Wheeze and Sustained Phonations for Automatic Classification Between Healthy Subjects and Asthmatic Patients | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Comparison of Cough, Wheeze and Sustained Phonations for Automatic Classification Between Healthy Subjects and Asthmatic Patients


Abstract:

In this work, we consider the task of automatic classification of asthmatic patients and healthy subjects using voice stimuli. Cough and wheeze have been used as voice st...Show More

Abstract:

In this work, we consider the task of automatic classification of asthmatic patients and healthy subjects using voice stimuli. Cough and wheeze have been used as voice stimuli for this classification task in the past. In this work, we focus on sustained phonations, namely /A:/, /i:/, /u:/, /eI/, /oU/ and compare their classification performances with the cough and wheeze. Classification experiments using 35 asthmatic patients and 36 healthy subjects show that sustained vowel /i:/ achieves the highest classification accuracy of 80.79% among five vowels considered. However, it is found to be higher and lower than the classification accuracies of 78.72% and 90.25% obtained using cough and wheeze respectively. This suggests that for speech-based asthma classification, /i:/ would be a better choice compared to other vowels considered in this work. However, when non-speech sounds are included for classification, wheeze is a better choice than sustained /i:/.
Date of Conference: 18-21 July 2018
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 28 October 2018
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

PubMed ID: 30440654
Conference Location: Honolulu, HI, USA

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.