Recently, motor imagery brain-computer interface (MI-BCI) has been studied as a motor learning method and evaluated by comparing with conventional passive and active training. Most functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies adopted block design for comparing those motor learning methods, including MI-BCI. Compared to the block design, event-related design would be more appropriate for estimating cortical activation in MI-BCI which provides feedback for each trial. This paper is a preliminary study to check the feasibility whether event-related design can be applicable for MI-BCI. To this end, three different motor learning methods involving MI-BCI were compared. In hemodynamic response, MI-BCI showed significantly stronger cortical activation than passive training (PT), and weaker than active training (AT), which conforms most existing studies. The results demonstrate that event-related design could be applied to investigate cortical effects of MI-BCI and comparing hemodynamic responses of different motor learning methods.