Abstract:
Because of the spread of using social networking service in various situations, it is becoming easier to transmit information. However, the communication channel of SNS h...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
Because of the spread of using social networking service in various situations, it is becoming easier to transmit information. However, the communication channel of SNS has some negative aspects like a lack of rich expressions of information compared to the communication channel of face-to-face (FTF). Also, in the FTF communication environment, it is necessary to improve a limitation of room or costs of moving to a place. In recent years, under the influence of future uncertainty, much attention has been paid to group decision-making based on discussion as one side of democracy. Deliberation Democracy is one of them. From the viewpoint of information communication technology and deliberation democracy, we will consider effective utilization of Deliberation Support System. In this paper, it is targeted the citizen deliberation or dialogue or discussion. We analyzed that the difference of Communications with the Social Media and FTF type. We clarified the difference of the communications frequency and the content between participants and viewers. As a result, when the case not done was compared when social media were used, a synchronous number of conversations (conversation rates) obtained the difference (93.6% (social media use), 67.6% (Do not use it)). Therefore, social media are used, their active was clarified. Moreover, it was clarified that the extension of the discussion that had been occasionally expressed only by the discussion between the performers tended to be brought by the viewer in the analysis of a qualitative content.
Date of Conference: 09-12 October 2016
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 09 February 2017
ISBN Information: