skip to main content
10.1145/1014052.1014060acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Fast nonlinear regression via eigenimages applied to galactic morphology

Published:22 August 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Astronomy increasingly faces the issue of massive, unwieldly data sets. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) [11] has so far generated tens of millions of images of distant galaxies, of which only a tiny fraction have been morphologically classified. Morphological classification in this context is achieved by fitting a parametric model of galaxy shape to a galaxy image. This is a nonlinear regression problem, whose challenges are threefold, 1) blurring of the image caused by atmosphere and mirror imperfections, 2) large numbers of local minima, and 3) massive data sets.Our strategy is to use the eigenimages of the parametric model to form a new feature space, and then to map both target image and the model parameters into this feature space. In this low-dimensional space we search for the best image-to-parameter match. To search the space, we sample it by creating a database of many random parameter vectors (prototypes) and mapping them into the feature space. The search problem then becomes one of finding the best prototype match, so the fitting process a nearest-neighbor search.In addition to the savings realized by decomposing the original space into an eigenspace, we can use the fact that the model is a linear sum of functions to reduce the prototypes further: the only prototypes stored are the components of the model function. A modified form of nearest neighbor is used to search among them.Additional complications arise in the form of missing data and heteroscedasticity, both of which are addressed with weighted linear regression. Compared to existing techniques, speed-ups ach-ieved are between 2 and 3 orders of magnitude. This should enable the analysis of the entire SDSS dataset.

References

  1. N. Ball, M. Fukugita, O. Nakamura, S. Okamura, J. Brinkmann, and R. J. Brunner. Galaxy Types in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Using Supervised Artificial Neural Networks. Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc., 348:1038, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. K. C. Freeman. On the Disks of Spiral and s0 Galaxies. Astrophysical Journal, 160:811, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. E. Hubble. The realm of the nebulae. Yale University Press, 1936.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mathworks Inc. Matlab, version 6, release 13, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Kirshner, I. Cadez, P. Smyth, and C. Kamath. Learning to classify galaxy shapes using the EM algorithm. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 15. Morgan Kaufmann, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Kormendy. Brightness distributions in compact and normal galaxies. III - Decomposition of observed profiles into spheroid and disk components. Astrophysical Journal, 217:406--419, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. Y. Peng, L. C. Ho, C. D. Impey, and H. Rix. Detailed Structural Decomposition of Galaxy Images. Astronomical Journal, 124:266--293, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. Ratnatunga, R. Griffiths, and E. Ostrander. Disk And Bulge Morphology Of Wfpc2 Galaxies: The Hst Medium Deep Survey Database. accepted to Astronomical Journal, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Luc Simard, Christopher N. A. Willmer, Nicole P. Vogt, Vicki L. Sarajedini, Andrew C. Phillips, Benjamin J. Weiner, David C. Koo, Myungshin Im, Garth D. Illingworth, and S. M. Faber. The Deep Groth Strip Survey II. Hubble Space Telescope Structural Parameters of Galaxies in the Groth Strip. Astrophysical Journal Supplements, 142(1), 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N. Slonim, R. Somerville, N. Tishby, and O. Lahav. Objective Classification of Galaxy Spectra using the Information Bottleneck Method. Monthly Notices to the Royal Astronomical Society, 323, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. G. York, J. Adelman, J.E. Anderson, and et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary. Astronomical Journal, 120:1579--1587, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Fast nonlinear regression via eigenimages applied to galactic morphology

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '04: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      August 2004
      874 pages
      ISBN:1581138881
      DOI:10.1145/1014052

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 August 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader