skip to main content
article

A galvanic skin response interface for people with severe motor disabilities

Published:01 September 2003Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Biometric input devices can provide assistive technology access to people who have little or no motor control. We explore a biometric control interface based on the Galvanic Skin Response, to determine its effectiveness as a non-muscular channel of input. This paper presents data from several online studies of a locked-in subject using a Galvanic Skin Response system for communication and control. We present issues with GSR control, and approaches that may improve accuracy and information transfer rate.

References

  1. Barnett HJM, Mohr JP, Stein BM and Yatsu FM. Stroke: Patho-physiology., diagnosis. & management. Churchill, Livingstone, 2nd Ed., 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cook, A. M. and Hussey, S. M., Assistive Technologies - Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jung, C.G., "On the Psychophysical relations of the association experiment", Journal of Abnormal psychology, 1, pp. 247--255 (Reprinted in the Collected Works, Vol. 2, chapter 12, 1907.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Abrams, S. "The polygraph in a psychiatric setting", American Journal of Psychiatry, 130(1), pp. 94-98, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Sakurazawa, S; Yoshida, N; Munekata, N; Omi, A; Takeshima, H; Koto, H; Gentsu, K; Kimura, K; Kawamura, K; Miyamoto, M; Arima, R; Mori, T; SekIya, T; Furukawa, T; Hashimoto, Y; Numata, H; Akita, J; Tsukahara, Y; and Matsubara, H. "A computer game using galvanic skin response", in Proceedings of the second international conference on Entertainment Computing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shepherd, P. The Biofeedback Monitor, in http://www.trans4mind.com/clarity/gsr.html, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. R. Wolpaw, N. Birbaumer, D. McFarland, G. Pfurtscheller and T.Vaughan. "Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control". Clinical Neurophysiology, 113:767-791, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Birbaumer, N., Hinterberger, T., Kubler, A., and Neumann, N. "The Thought-Translation Device (TTD): Neurobehavioral Mechanisms and Clinical Outcomes", IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Moore, M. "Real World Applications for Brain-Computer Interfaces", IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Axciton Systems, Axciton User's Manual, Version 3.X, 2003. Available on www.axciton.com http://www.axciton.com. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallo, Fred P. Energy Psychology in Psychotherapy, CRC Press, July 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. MIT Affective Computing Research Group, http://affect.media.mit.edu/AC_research/sensing.html, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A galvanic skin response interface for people with severe motor disabilities

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    Joan Catherine Horvath

    The use of galvanic skin response (GSR), the core measurement in lie detector tests, is proposed as a method for "locked-in" patients to communicate with the outside world. "Locked-in" patients have lost all ability to move, and, in some cases, even to communicate with any kind of brain-computer interface. The GSR measures changes in the electrical conductivity of the skin. Moore and Dua worked with one locked-in subject to see whether he could in fact control his level of GSR response, to tell the researchers "yes" or "no." A "yes" response required the subject to raise his galvanic response; a "no" response required him to hold it steady. The data are all based on this one subject, and are unfortunately rather weakly correlated with the desired communications (a requested "yes" or "no" response), though they are somewhat better correlated for "no" responses, as one might expect. Artifacts were a problem, and using only one subject had its limitations as well. Having said that, this is an interesting snapshot of work in progress, and the authors say that they are moving on to study more locked-in subjects, as well as some healthy controls. It will be interesting to see whether the communication accuracy rises with some subjects, and with experience with the research protocols. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing
      ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing Just Accepted
      Sept. 2003 - Jan. 2004
      192 pages
      ISSN:1558-2337
      EISSN:1558-1187
      DOI:10.1145/1029014
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      • cover image ACM Conferences
        Assets '04: Proceedings of the 6th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
        October 2004
        202 pages
        ISBN:158113911X
        DOI:10.1145/1028630

      Copyright © 2003 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 September 2003

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader