Leslie D. Setlock
Susan R. Fussell
ABSTRACT
As new communications media foster international collaborations, we would be remiss in overlooking cultural differences when assessing them. In this study, 24 pairs in three cultural groupings--American-American (AA), Chinese-Chinese (CC) and American-Chinese (AC) --worked on two decision-making tasks, one face-to-face and the other via IM. Drawing upon prior research, we predicted differences in conversational efficiency, conversational content, interaction quality, persuasion, and performance. The quantitative results combined with conversation analysis suggest that the groups viewed the task differently--AA pairs as an exercise in situation-specific compromise; CC as consensus-reaching. Cultural differences were reduced but not eliminated in the IM condition.
- Anderson, W. N. & Hiltz, R. S. (2001). Culturally heterogeneous vs. culturally homogeneous groups in distributed group support systems: Effects on group process and consensus. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Armstrong, D., & Cole, P. (2002). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.) Distributed work (pp. 167--186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Brennan, S., & Ohaeri, J. (1999). Why do Electronic Conversations Seem Less Polite? The Costs and Benefits of Hedging. Proceedings, International Joint Conference on Work Activities, Coordination, and Collaboration (WACC '99) (pp 227--235). San Francisco, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brock, T.C. (1965). Communicator-recipient similarity and decision change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 650--654.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brown, P., & Levinson, S (1987). Universals in Language Usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56--289). Cambridge,: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bradner, E., & G. Mark. (2002). Why distance matters: Effects on cooperation, persuasion, & deception. Proceedings of CSCW '02 (pp. 226--235). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127--149). Washington, DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, H. H. & Marshall, C. E. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10--63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1--39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organizational Science, 12, 346--371. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Curtis, B., Krasner, H. & Iscoe, N. (1988). A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31, 1268--1287. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1984). Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L. L. Cummings & B.M. Staw, (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior 6, (pp. 191--233). Homewood, IL: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A. H., O'Malley, C., Langton, S., Garrod, S. & Bruce, V. (1997). Face-to-face and video mediated communication: a comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3,105--125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erickson, T., Smith, D.N., Kellogg, W.A., Laff, M., Righards, J.T., & Bradner, E. (1999) Socially translucent systems: Social proxies, persistent conversation, and the design of "babble". Proceedings of CHI '99 (pp.72--76). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 378--391.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fussell, S.R., Kraut, R.E., & Siegel, J. (2000). Coordination of communication: Effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. Proceedings of CSCW 2000 (pp. 21--30). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fussell, S. R., Setlock, L. D., Yang, J., Ou, J., Mauer, E. M., & Kramer, A. (in press). Gestures over video streams to support remote collaboration on physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gergle, D., Millen, D., Kraut, R., & Fussell, S. (2004). Persistence matters: Making the most of chat in tightlycoupled work. Proceedings of CHI '04 (pp. 431--438). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gudykunst, W. & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Culture and Interpersonal Communication. Newbury Park, CA Sage.Google Scholar
- Hall, E. 1976/1981. Beyond culture. NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
- Herbsleb, J. D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T. A., & Grinter, R. E. (2000). Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration. In Proceedings of CSCW 2000 (pp. 319--328). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Holtgraves, T. (1997) Styles of language use: Individual and cultural variability in conversational indirectness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 624--637.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Holtgraves, T. & Yang, J. (1992) Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: General principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 246--256.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hupet, M., Chantraine, Y., & Neff, F. (1993). References in conversation between young and old normal adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 339--346.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Isaacs, E., & Clark, H. H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. J. of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26--37.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Isbister, K., Nakanishi, H., Ishida, T., & Nass., C. (2000). Helper Agent: Designing an assistant for human-human interaction in a virtual meeting space. In Proceedings of CHI 2000 (pp. 57--64). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1988). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. In Computer-supported cooperative work: A book of readings (pp. 657--682). Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kramer, A.D.I, Fussell, S. R., & Setlock, L. D. (2004) Text analysis as a tool for analyzing conversation in online support groups. CHI 2004 Late Breaking Results. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennen, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.) Distributed work (pp. 137--162). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., & Siegel, J. (2003). Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 13--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Little, J., Granger, M. Adams, E., Holvikivi, J., Lippert, S., Walker, H., & Young, A. (2001) Integrating cultural issues into the computer and information technology curriculum. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin Inroads, 33, 136--154. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lundeberg, M., Fox, P., Brown, A., and Elbedour, S. (2000) Cultural Influences on Confidence: Country and Gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 152--159.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mackie, D.M. (1986) Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 730--728.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 20, 568--579.Google Scholar
- Massey, A., Montoya-Weiss, M., Hung, C. & Ramesh, V. (2001) When culture and style aren't about clothes: Perceptions of task-technology "fit" in global virtual teams. In Proceedings of the ACM 2001 Group Conference (pp. 207--213). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matheson, K. (1991) Social cues in computer-mediated negotiations: Gender makes a difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 137--145.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morand, D. (1995) Politeness as a Universal Variable. The International Journal of Organization Analysis, 3, 52--74.Google Scholar
- Nardi, B.A., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E. (2000) Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. Proceedings of CSCW 2000 (pp.79--88). NY:ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neuwirth, C. M., Chandok, R., Charnet, D., Wojahn, P. & Loel, K (1994). Distributed collaborative writing: A comparison of spoken and written modalities for reviewing and revising documents. Proceedings of CHI 1994 (pp. 51--57). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139--179. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M. & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3--72.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pennebaker, J.W., & Francis, M.E. (1999). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC {software program for text analysis}. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Ralston, D., Cunniff, M., Gustafson, D. (1995) Cultural Accomodation: The effect of language on the responses of bilingual Hong Kong Chinese managers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 714--727.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Straus, S., & McGrath, J. Does the Medium Matter? The Interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. (1994) Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87--97.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 Countries. In M. Zanna (Ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1--65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Setlock, L. D., Fussell, S. R., Kiesler, S., & Weisband, S. (under review). Managing work trajectories in collaborative writing.Google Scholar
- Teng, J., Calhoun, K. Cheon, M. Raeburn, S., Wong, W. (1999) Is the East really different from the West: A crosscultural study on information technology and decision making. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 40--46). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Triandis, H. (1980). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior, In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values (pp. 195--259). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and behavior in different cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506--520.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Veinott, E., Olson, J., Olson, G. & Fu, X. (1999) Video helps remote work: Speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other. In Proceedings of CHI 1999 (pp. 302--309). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Taking it out of context: collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging
Recommendations
Cultural difference and adaptation of communication styles in computer-mediated group brainstorming
CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSupporting creativity via collaborative group brainstorming is a prevalent practice in organizations. Today's technology makes it easy for international and intercultural group members to brainstorm together remotely, but surprisingly little is known ...
Effects of instant messaging on the management of multiple project trajectories
CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe present a study of the effects of instant messaging (IM) on individuals' management of work across multiple collaborative projects. Groups of four participants completed four web design tasks. Each participant worked on two tasks, each task with a ...
Collaborating across cultural and technological boundaries: team culture and information use in a map navigation task
IWIC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 international workshop on Intercultural collaborationThe increased globalization of the workplace and the availability of collaboration technologies are making CMC a necessary aspect of teamwork [27]. Culturally diverse teams are becoming the norm in knowledge-intensive projects that involve making sense ...
Comments