skip to main content
10.1145/1040830.1040860acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Interfaces for networked media exploration and collaborative annotation

Published:10 January 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present our efforts towards creating interfaces for networked media exploration and collaborative annotation. The problem is important since online social networks are emerging as conduits for exchange of everyday experiences. These networks do not currently provide media-rich communication environments. Our approach has two parts -- collaborative annotation, and a media exploration framework. The collaborative annotation takes place through a web based interface, and provides to each user personalized recommendations, based on media features, and by using a common sense inference toolkit. We develop three media exploration interfaces that allow for two-way interaction amongst the participants -- (a) spatio-temporal evolution, (b) event cones and (c) viewpoint centric interaction. We also analyze the user activity to determine important people and events, for each user. We also develop subtle visual interface cues for activity feedback. Preliminary user studies indicate that the system performs well and is well liked by the users.

References

  1. TIGER maps http://imagemaps.mle.ie/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Friendster http://www.friendster.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Appan and H. Sundaram (2004). Networked event exploration and interaction summarization, Proc. ACM Multimedia 2004, New York, New York, also AME TR-2004-10, Oct. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. d. boyd (2004). Friendster and Publicly Articulated Social Networks, Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, Vienna. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. M. Brooks (1997). Do story agents use rocking chairs? The theory and implementation of one model for computational narrative, Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Multimedia, 317--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Cristianini and J. Shawe-Taylor (2000). An introduction to support vector machines : and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York, Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Davis, N. Good and R. Sarvas (2004). From Context to Content: Leveraging Context for Mobile Media Metadata, MobiSys 2004 Workshop on Context Awareness, Boston, MA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. S. Donath (1997). Inhabiting the virtual city:The design of social environments for electronic communities, MIT, PhD Thesis. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. E. Ellis and D. P. Groth (2004). A collaborative annotation system for data visualization, Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, ACM Press, 411--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Gemmell, G. Bell, R. Lueder, et al. (2002). MyLifeBits: fulfilling the Memex vision, Proceedings of the 10th ACM international conference on Multimedia, Juan Les-Pins, France, pp. 235--238, Dec. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Kang and B. Shneiderman (2000). Visualization Methods for Personal Photo Collections : Browsing and Searching in the PhotoFinder, (ICME2000), New York:, IEEE, 1539--1542.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. Liu and P. Singh (2004). ConceptNet: a practical commonsense reasoning toolkit. BT Technology Journal 22(4): pp. 211--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. Shen, B. Moghaddam, N. Lesh, et al. (2001). Personal Digital Historian: User Interface Design, In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2001), ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. H. Sridharan, H. Sundaram and T. Rikakis (2003). Context, memory and Hyper-mediation in Experiential Systems, 1st ACM Workshop on Experiential Telepresence, in conjunction with ACM Multimedia 2003,, Berkeley CA, AME-TR-2003-02, Nov. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. White (2002). The elements of graphic design : space, unity, page architecture, and type. New York, Allworth Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interfaces for networked media exploration and collaborative annotation

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Conferences
                    IUI '05: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
                    January 2005
                    344 pages
                    ISBN:1581138946
                    DOI:10.1145/1040830

                    Copyright © 2005 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 10 January 2005

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • Article

                    Acceptance Rates

                    Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader