Abstract
Semantic integration is an active area of research in several disciplines, such as databases, information-integration, and ontologies. This paper provides a brief survey of the approaches to semantic integration developed by researchers in the ontology community. We focus on the approaches that differentiate the ontology research from other related areas. The goal of the paper is to provide a reader who may not be very familiar with ontology research with introduction to major themes in this research and with pointers to different research projects. We discuss techniques for finding correspondences between ontologies, declarative ways of representing these correspondences, and use of these correspondences in various semantic-integration tasks
- J. Barwise and J. Seligman. Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems. Cambridge University Press, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Calvanese, G. Giacomo, and M. Lenzerini. Ontology of integration and integration of ontologies. In Description Logic Workshop (DL 2001), pages 10--19, 2001.Google Scholar
- D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, M. Lenzerini, R. Rosati, and G. Vetere. DL-lite: Practical Reasoning for Rich DLs. In International Workshop on Description Logics (DL2004), Whistler, Canada, 2004.Google Scholar
- M. Crubézy and M. A. Musen. Ontologies in support of problem solving. In S. Staab and R. Studer, editors, Handbook on Ontologies, pages 321--342. Sringer, 2003.Google Scholar
- A. Doan, J. Madhavan, P. Domingos, and A. Halevy. Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web. In The Eleventh International WWW Conference, Hawaii, US, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Dou, D. McDermott, and P. Qi. Ontology translation on the semantic web. In International Conference on Ontologies, Databases and Applications of Semantics, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Euzenat and P. Valtchev. Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-Lite. In The 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-04), Valencia, Spain, 2004.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Gangemi, N. Guarino, C. Masolo, and A. Oltramari. Sweetening wordnet with DOLCE. AI Magazine, 24(3): 13--24, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Ganter and R. Wille. Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical foundations. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Giunchiglia, P. Shvaiko, and M. Yatskevich. Semantic matching. In 1st European semantic web symposium (ESWS'04), pages 61--75, Heraklion, Greece, 2004.Google Scholar
- M. Grüninger. A guide to the ontology of the process specification language. In S. Staab and R. Studer, editors, Handbook on Ontologies. Sringer, 2003.Google Scholar
- M. Grüninger and J. Kopena. Semantic integration through invariants. In A. Doan, A. Halevy, and N. Noy, editors, Workshop on Semantic Integration at ISWC-2003, Sanibel Island, FL, 2003.Google Scholar
- E. Hovy. Combining and standardizing largescale, practical ontologies for machine translation and other uses. In The First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 535--542, Granada, Spain, 1998.Google Scholar
- Y. Kalfoglou and M. Schorlemmer. IF-Map: an ontology mapping method based on information flow theory. Journal on Data Semantics, 1(1):98--127, Oct. 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Kalfoglou and M. Schorlemmer. Ontology mapping: the state of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(1): 1--31, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Klein. Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problems and solutions. In IJCAI-2001 Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, pages 53--62, Seattle, WA, 2001.Google Scholar
- J. Madhavan, P. Bernstein, and E. Rahm. Generic schema matching using Cupid. In The 27th International Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB'01), Rome, Italy, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Maedche, B. Motik, N. Silva, and R. Volz. MAFRA - a mapping framework for distributed ontologies. In 13th European Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management EKAW, Madrid, Spain, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Niles and A. Pease. Towards a standard upper ontology. In The 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS-2001), Ogunquit, Maine, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. F. Noy and M. A. Musen. The PROMPT suite: Interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(6):983--1024, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Polyak, J. Lee, M. Gruninger, and C. Menzel. Applying the process interchange format(PIF) to a supply chain process interoperability scenario. In Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem Solving Methods, ECAI'98, Brighton, England, 1998.Google Scholar
- E. Rahm and P. A. Bernstein. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB Journal, 10(4), 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Stumme and A. Mädche. FCA-Merge: Bottom-up merging of ontologies. In 7th Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI '01), pages 225--230, Seattle, WA, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Uschold and M. Grüninger. Ontologies and semantics for seamless connectivity. SIGMOD Record, 33(3), 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Valente, T. Russ, R. MacGrecor, and W. Swartout. Building and (re)using an ontology for air campaign planning. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(1):27--36, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Welty. Ontology research. AI Magazine, 24(3), 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Domain Ontology Component-Based Semantic Information Integration
ETCS '09: Proceedings of the 2009 First International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science - Volume 03Research on architecture of domain ontology component-based information semantic representation and integration is studied. Domain ontology component, a "loosely coupled" approach in the use of ontology, is advocated. As a case study, a prototype for ...
Institutionalising ontology-based semantic integration
We address what is still a scarcity of general mathematical foundations for ontology-based semantic integration underlying current knowledge engineering methodologies in decentralised and distributed environments. After recalling the first-order ...
Ontology alignment for semantic data integration through foundational ontologies
ER'12: Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on Advances in Conceptual ModelingOntology alignment is the process of finding corresponding entities with the same intended meaning in different ontologies. In scenarios where an ontology conceptually describes the contents of a data repository, this provides valuable information for ...
Comments