skip to main content
article

Students becoming political and "incorrect" through agile methods

Published:28 June 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

At the risk of being condemned as a software engineering heretic, it seems to me that notions of accuracy and correctness of software have intuitive appeal, but are difficult if not impossible to achieve in practice. The search for this chimera of "correctness" has misled many highly intelligent and technically capable developers into the quest for rigour in design, rather than rigour in requirements. But what does rigour in requirements mean? If we believe, with Boehm and colleagues [1] that "There is no complete and well defined set of requirements ready to be discovered in system development", what then is the requirements correctness criterion? And furthermore what is the correctness criterion for an implemented software system.

References

  1. Boehm, B., Grunbacher, P. and Briggs, R. Developing Groupware for Requirements Negotiation: Lessons Learned. IEEE Software, May/June (2001), 46--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cumberlege, R., Green, J. and Clear, T., Client Relationships - A Proven Approach. in 17th Annual NACCQ Conference, (Christchurch, New Zealand, 2004), NACCQ, 488.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fowler, M. and Highsmith, J. The Agile Manifesto. Software Development, 9, 8 (2001), 28--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Highsmith, J. Agile Project Management. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H. Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development. Communications of the ACM, 32, 10 (1989), 1199--1216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hirscheim, R. and Newman, M. Symbolism and information systems development: myth, metaphor and magic. Information Systems Research, 2 (1991), 29--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Luca, J. D. FDD - Feature Driven Development. Nebulon Pty., 2003: http://www.featuredrivendevelopment.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Myers, M. Dialectical hermeneutics: a theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems. Information Systems Journal, 5, 1 (1995), 51--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
    ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 36, Issue 4
    December 2004
    145 pages
    ISSN:0097-8418
    DOI:10.1145/1041624
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    • cover image ACM Conferences
      ITiCSE-WGR '04: Working group reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education
      June 2004
      152 pages
      ISBN:9781450377942
      DOI:10.1145/1044550

    Copyright © 2004 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 June 2004

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • article
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader