skip to main content
10.1145/1065983.1066019acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Efficient operating system support for group unicast

Published:13 June 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

A common requirement of many Internet services is to send exactly the same data to a number of hosts at the same time. Without IP-level multicast, this form of group communication is realized by unicasting the data to each desired host. Although this approach is portable and easy to implement, it is extremely inefficient for the sending host. In this paper, we propose a kernel-based technique to efficiently facilitate unicast send operations for group communication with only minimal additions to the sending operating system interface and implementation. We present the design and prototype implementation of our approach and experimentally demonstrate the significant performance improvements it provides. Additionally, we conduct experiments to decompose the processing costs in the network stack and show that the biggest cost reductions are not necessarily due to reduced memory copying.

References

  1. A. Abdelkhalek, A. Bilas, and A. Moshovos. Behavior and performance of interactive multi-player game servers. Cluster Computing, 6(4):355--366, Oct. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Ammar, K. Almeroth, R. Clark, and Z. Fei. Multicast delivery of web pages or how to make web servers pushy. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Internet Server Performance, Madison, Wisconsin, June 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Banerjee, B. Bhattacharjee, and C. Kommareddy. Scalable application layer multicast. Technical Report UMIACS TR-2002, University of Maryland, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Chu, S. Rao, and H. Zhang. A case for end system multicast. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS, ages 1--12, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Deering. Multicast routing in internetworks and extended lans. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, pages 55--64, August 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Diot and L. Guatier. A distributed architecture for multiplayer interactive applications on the Internet. IEEE Network, 13(4):6--15, August 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Diot, B. Levine, B. Lyles, H. Kassem, and D. Balensiefen. Deployment issues for the IP multicast service and architecture. IEEE Network, 14(1):78--88, January 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Z. Ditta, G. Parulkar, and J. C. Jr. The APIC approach to high performance network interface design: Protected and other techniques. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, volume 2, pages 7--11, April 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Francis. Yoid: Your own Internet distribution, April 2000. http://www.aciri.org/yoid.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Gallatin, J. Chase, and K. Yocum. Trapeze/IP: TCP/IP at near-gigabit speeds. In Proceedings of USENIX Technical Conference (Freenix Track), pages 109--120, June 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Jannotti, D. Gifford, K. Johnson, M. Kaashoek, and J. O'Toole, Jr. Overcast: Reliable multicasting with an overlay network. In Proceedings of Operating System Design and Implementation (OSDI), pages 197--212, October 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Kay and J. Pasquale. Profiling and reducing processing overheads in TCP/IP. IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking, 4(6):817--828, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. Khalidi and M. Thadani. An efficient zero-copy I/O framework for UNIX. Technical Report SMLI TR95-39, Sun Microsystems Lab, May 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Macedonia, M. Zyda, D. Pratt, P. Barham, and S. Zeswitz. NPSNET: A network software architecture for large scale virtual environments. Presence, 3(4):265--287, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. McCanne and V. Jacobson. vic: A flexible framework for packet video. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, pages 511--522, January 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Pendarakis, S. Shi, D. Verma, and M. Waldvogel. ALMI: An application level multicast infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 3rd USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (USITS), pages 49--60, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. I. Stoica, D. Adkins, S. Zhuang, S. Shenker, and S. Surana. Internet indirection infrastructure. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, pages 73--88, August 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficient operating system support for group unicast

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    NOSSDAV '05: Proceedings of the international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video
    June 2005
    210 pages
    ISBN:158113987X
    DOI:10.1145/1065983

    Copyright © 2005 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 June 2005

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate118of363submissions,33%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader