skip to main content
10.1145/1089444.1089494acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Transmission power control in MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 October 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Medium access control (MAC) protocols manage energy consumption on the network element during communication, which is the most energy-consuming event on Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). One method to mitigate energy consumption is to adjust transmission power. This paper presents two approaches to adjust transmission power in WSNs. The first approach employs dynamic adjustments by exchange of information among nodes, and the second one calculates the ideal transmission power according to signal attenuation in the link. The proposed algorithms were implemented and evaluated with experiments, comparing their results with B-MAC, the standard MAC protocol in the Mica Motes 2 platform. Results show that transmission power control is an effective method to decrease energy consumption, and incurs in a negligible loss in packet delivery rates. For node distances of 5m, the proposed transmission power control techniques decrease energy consumption by 27% over B-MAC.

References

  1. S. Agarwal, S. Krishnamurthy, R. Katz, and S. Dao. Distributed power control in ad hoc wireless networks. In Personal and Indoor Mobile Radio Communication (PIMRC), volume 2, pages 59--66. IEEE, October 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. CC 1000. Chipcon corporation. CC1000 low power FSK transceiver. http://www.chipcon.com, March 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. H. A. Correia, D. F. Macedo, A. L. dos Santos, J. M. Nogueira, and A. A. F. Loureiro. A taxonomy for medium access control protocols in wireless sensor network. Annals of telecommunications, 2005. to appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. H. T. Friis. A note on a simple transmission formula. Proc. IRE, 34:254--256, 1946.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Gomez and A. T. Campbell. A case for variable-range transmission power control in wireless multihop networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, volume 2, pages 1425--1436, March 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. Culler, and K. Pister. System architecture directions for networked sensors. In ASPLOS-IX: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, pages 93--104. ACM Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci. A Survey on Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications, 40(8):102--114, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E.-S. Jung and N. H. Vaidya. A power control MAC protocol for ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 8th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pages 36--47. ACM Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Karn. A New Channel Access Protocol for Packet Radio. In American Radio Relay League -- 9th Computer Networking Conference, April 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Lal, A. Manjeshwar, F. Herrmann, E. Uysal-Biyikoglu, and A. Keshavarzian. Measurement and characterization of link quality metrics in energy constrained wireless sensor networks. In IEEE GLOBECOM, pages 172--187, December 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. K. Langendoen and G. Halkes. Energy-efficient medium access control. In R. Zurawski, editor, Embedded Systems Handbook. CRC Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. W. C. Lee. Mobile Communications Engineering. McGraw-Hill Professional, 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Levis, S. Madden, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, K. Whitehouse, A. Woo, D. Gay, J. Hill, M. Welsh, E. Brewer, and D. Culler. TinyOS: An operating system for wireless sensor networks. In W. Weber, J. Rabaey, and E. Aarts, editors, Ambient Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Michaela Cardei and Jie Wu. Energy-Efficient Coverage Problems in Wireless Ad Hoc Sensor Networks. Journal of Computer Communications on Sensor Networks, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. P. Monks. Transmission Power Control for Enhancing the performance of wireless packet data networks. Doctor of philosophy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. A. Pires, J. F. de Rezende, and C. Cordeiro. ALCA: A new scheme for power control on 802.11 ad hoc networks. In IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), pages 475--477, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Polastre, J. Hill, and D. Culler. Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 95--107. ACM Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. N. Reijers, G. Halkes, and K. Langendoen. Link layer measurements in sensor networks. In 1st IEEE Int. Conference on Mobile Ad hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS '04), Oct 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. S. Tilak, N. B. Abu-Ghazaleh, and W. Heinzelman. Infrastructure Trade-offs Sensor Networks. In First International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Woo and D. E. Culler. A transmission control scheme for media access in sensor networks. In Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 221--235, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. Woo, T. Tong, and D. Culler. Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the first international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 14--27. ACM Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. An energy-efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1567--1576, New York, NY, USA, June 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. G. Zhou, T. He, S. Krishnamurthy, and J. A. Stankovic. Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, pages 125--138. ACM Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Transmission power control in MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MSWiM '05: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international symposium on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems
        October 2005
        372 pages
        ISBN:1595931880
        DOI:10.1145/1089444

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 October 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        MSWiM '05 Paper Acceptance Rate48of165submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader