skip to main content
article

Designing and evaluating kalas: A social navigation system for food recipes

Published:01 September 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The idea of social navigation is to aid users to navigate information spaces through making the collective, aggregated, or individual actions of others visible and useful as a basis for making decisions on where to go next and what to choose. These social markers should also help in turning the navigation experience into a social and pleasurable one rather than the tedious, boring, frustrating, and sometimes even scary experience of a lonely traveler. To evaluate whether it is possible to design for social navigation, we built the food recipe system Kalas. It includes several different forms of aggregated trails of user actions and means of communication between users: recommender system functionality (recommendations computed from others' choices), real-time broadcasting of concurrent user activity in the interface, possibilities to comment and vote on recipes, the number of downloads per recipe, and chatting facilities. Recipe author was also included in the recipe description.Kalas was tried with 302 users during six months, and 73 of the users answered a final questionnaire. The overall impression was that users liked and acted on aggregated trails and navigated differently because of them. 18% of the selected recipes came from the list of recommended recipes. About half of the 73 users understood that recommendations were computed from their own and others actions, while the rest had not reflected upon it or had erroneous beliefs. Interestingly, both groups selected a large proportion of their recipes from the recommendations.Unfortunately, there were not enough users to populate the space at every occasion, and thus both chatting and following other users moving in the space was for the most part not possible, but when possible, users move to the space where most other users could be found. Of the other social textures, users themselves claimed to be most influenced by other users' comments attached to the recipes and less by recipe author or number of downloads. Users are more positive to the possibility of expressing themselves in terms of comments and voting than seeing the comments and votes of others.It was noted that users did not pick more recommended recipes towards the end of the study period when the accuracy of recommendations should have been higher. More or less from the start, they picked recommended recipes and went on doing so throughout the whole period.

References

  1. Breese, J. S., Heckerman, D., and Kadie, C. 1998. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Calderón-Banavides, M. L., González-Caro, C. N., Pérez-Alcázar, J. de J., Garcia-Diaz, J. C., and Delgado, J. 2004. A comparison of several predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering on multi-valued ratings. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. 1033--1039. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cosley, D., Lam, S. K., Albert, I., Konstan, J., and Riedl, J. 2003. Is Seeing Believing? How Recommender Systems Influence Users' Opinions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Fort Lauderdale, FL. 585--592. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cosley, S. Lawrence, and D. M. Pennock. 2002. REFEREE: An open framework for practical testing of recommender systems using researchindex. In the 28th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB'02) Hong Kong. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dieberger, A. 1997. Supporting social navigation on the World-Wide Web. Intl. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 46, 6, 805--826. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dieberger, A., Dourish, P., Höök, K., Resnick, P., and Wexelblat, A. 2000. Social navigation: techniques for building more usable systems. Interactions (Nov.-Dec.), ACM. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dieberger, A. and Lönnqvist, P. 2000. Visualizing interaction history on a collaborative Web server. Hypertext 2000. 220--221. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dourish, P. and Chalmers, M. 1994. Running out of space: Models of information navigation. In Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction (HCI'94).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Erickson, T. 1996. The World Wide Web as social hypertext. Comm. ACM 39, 1, 15--17. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Erickson, T. 2004. Designing online collaborative environments: Social visualizations as shared resources. In Proceedings of the 9th International Working Conference on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modeling (LAP'04). M. Aakhus and M. Lind, Eds. Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Erickson, T., Smith, D. N., Kellogg, A. W., Laff, M., Richards, J. T., John T., and Bradner, E. 1999. Socially translucent systems: Social proxies, persistent conversation, and the design of “babble”. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Pittsburgh, PA. 72--79. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Girgensohn, A. and Lee, A. 2002. Making Web sites be places for social interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'02). 136--145. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., and Riedl, J. 2000. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 2--6. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill, W. C., Hollan, J. D., Wroblewski, D., and McCandless, T. 1992. Edit wear and read wear. In Proceedings the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Monterey, CA. 3--9. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Höök, K., Munro, A., and Benyon, D., Eds. 2002. Designing Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach. Springer Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Konstan, J. A., Miller, B. N., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J. L., Gordon, L. R., and Riedl, J. 1997. GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to usenet news. Comm. ACM 40, 3, 77--87. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Maglio, P. and Barrett, R. 1999. WebPlaces: Adding people to the web. In the 8th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW8). Toronto, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Munro, A. 1999. Fringe Benefits: An ethnographic study of social navigation at the Edinburgh festival. Deliverable 2.1.1 from the PERSONA Project, available from SICS, Stockholm, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Munro, A., Höök, K., and Benyon, D., Eds. 1999. Social Navigation in Information Space. Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Shardanand, U. and Maes, P. 1995. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating “word of mouth”. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'95). Denver, CO. 210--217. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Streeter, L. A., Vitello, D., and Wonsiewicz, S. A. 1985. How to tell people where to go: Comparing navigational aids. Intl. J. Man-Machine Stud. 22, 549--562. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Svensson M., Höök, K., Laaksolahti, J., and Waern A. 2001. Social navigation of food recipes. In Proceedings of of the Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'01). Seattle, WA. 341--348. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Timpka, T. and Hallberg N. 1996. Talking at work---professional advice-seeking at primary healthcare centers. Scand. J. Prim Health Care 14, 130--135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wexelblat, A. 2002. Results from the Footprints project. In Designing Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach, K. Höök, A. Munro, and D. Benyon, Eds. Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Wexelblat, A. and Maes, P. 1999. Footprints: History--rich tools for information foraging. In Proceeding of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'99). Pittsburgh, PA. 270--277. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing and evaluating kalas: A social navigation system for food recipes

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader