skip to main content
10.1145/1097064.1097078acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Finding corresponding objects when integrating several geo-spatial datasets

Published:04 November 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

When integrating geo-spatial datasets, a join algorithm is used for finding sets of corresponding objects (i.e., objects that represent the same real-world entity). Algorithms for joining two datasets were studied in the past. This paper investigates integration of three datasets and proposes methods that can be easily generalized to any number of datasets. Two approaches that use only locations of objects are presented and compared. In one approach, a join algorithm for two datasets is applied sequentially. In the second approach, all the integrated datasets are processed simultaneously. For the two approaches, join algorithms are given and their performances, in terms of recall and precision, are compared. The algorithms are designed to perform well even when locations are imprecise and each dataset represents only some of the real-world entities. Results of extensive experiments show that one of the algorithms has the best (or close to the best) performances under all circumstances. This algorithm has a much better performance than applying sequentially the one-sided nearest-neighbor join.

References

  1. C. Beeri, Y. Kanza, E. Safra, and Y. Sagiv. Object fusion in geographic information systems. In Proc. of the 13th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Toronto (Ontario, Canada), 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. O. Boucelma, M. Essid, and Z. Lacroix. A WFS-based mediation system for GIS interoperability. In Proc. of the 10th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, McLean, (Virginia, US), 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. T. Bruns and M. Egenhofer. Similarity of spatial scenes. In Proc. of the 7th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Delft (Netherlands), 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. A. Cobb, M. J. Chung, H. Foley, F. E. Petry, and K. B. Show. A rule-based approach for con ation of attribute vector data. GioInformatica, 2(1):7--33, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Devogele, C. Parent, and S. Spaccapietra. On spatial database integration. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 12(4), 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Y. Doytsher and S. Filin. The detection of of corresponding objects in a linear-based map con ation. Surveying and Land Information Systems, 60(2):117--128, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Y. Doytsher, S. Filin, and E. Ezra. Transformation of datasets in a linear-based map con ation framework. Surveying and Land Information Systems, 61(3):159--169, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. F. T. Fonseca and M. J. Egenhofer. Ontology-driven geographic information systems. In Proc. of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Kansas City (Missouri, US), 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. F. T. Fonseca, M. J. Egenhofer, and P. Agouris. Using ontologies for integrated geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS, 6(3), 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. Laurini, K. Yetongnon, and D. Benslimane. Gis interoperability, from problems to solutions. In Encyclopedia of of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Eolss Publishers, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H. Mayer. Automatic object extraction from aerial imagery - a survey focusing on buildings. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 74(2), 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. E. M. Mikhail. Observations and Least Squares. University Press of America, 1976.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Minami. Using ArcMap. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. Parent and S. Spaccapietra. Database integration: The key to data interoperability. In Advances in Object-Oriented Data Modeling. MIT Press, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. B. Rosen and A. Saalfeld. Match criteria for automatic alignment. In Proc. of 7th International Symposium on Computer-Assisted Cartography (Auto-Carto 7), 1985.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Saalfeld. Con ation-automated map compilation. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 2(3):217--228, 1988.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. A. Samal, S. Seth, and K. Cueto. A feature based approach to con ation of geospatial sources. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(00):1--31, 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Sinkhorn. A relationship between arbitrary positive matrices and doubly stochastic matrices. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35(2):876--879, 1964.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. R. Sinkhorn. Diagonal equivalence to matrices with perscribed row and column sums. The American Mathematical Monthly, 74(4):402--405, 1967.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. H. Uitermark, P. V. Oosterom, N. Mars, and M. Molenaar. Ontology-based geographic data set integration. In Proc. of Workshop on Spatio-Temporal Database Management, Edinburgh (Scotland), 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. G. Wiederhold. Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. Computer, 25(3):38--49, 1992.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G. Wiederhold. Mediation to deal with heterogeneous data sources. In Proc. of 2nd International Conference on Introperating Geographic Information Systems, Zurich (Swizerland), 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Finding corresponding objects when integrating several geo-spatial datasets

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GIS '05: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international workshop on Geographic information systems
        November 2005
        306 pages
        ISBN:1595931465
        DOI:10.1145/1097064

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 November 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader