skip to main content
10.1145/1124772.1124886acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Gaze-based interaction for semi-automatic photo cropping

Published:22 April 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an interactive method for cropping photographs given minimal information about important content location, provided by eye tracking. Cropping is formulated in a general optimization framework that facilitates adding new composition rules, and adapting the system to particular applications. Our system uses fixation data</ to identify important image content and compute the best crop for any given aspect ratio or size, enabling applications such as automatic snapshot recomposition, adaptive documents, and thumbnailing. We validate our approach with studies in which users compare our crops to ones produced by hand and by a completely automatic approach. Experiments show that viewers prefer our gaze-based crops to uncropped images and fully automatic crops.

References

  1. Arnheim, R. Art and Visual Perception. University of California Press, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnheim, R. The Power of the Center. University of California Press, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee, S. Composition Guided Image Aquisition. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Byers, Z., Dixon, M., Smart, W. D., and Grimm, C. M. Say cheese!: Experiences with a robot photographer. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (IAAI-03), Acapulco, Mexico.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, L., Xie, X., Fan, X., Ma, W., Shang, H., and Zhou, H. A visual attention mode for adapting images on small displays. MSR-TR-2002-125 Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Christoudias, C., Georgescu, B., and Meer, P. Synergism in low level vision. Proceedings ICPR 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Crow, F. Summed-area tables for texture mapping. Siggraph '84. 207--2 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. David, H. A. The method of paired comparisons. Charles Griffin and Company, London, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. DeCarlo, D., and Santella, A. Stylization and abstraction of photographs. Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2002. 769--776. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Duchowski, A. Acuity-matching resolution degradation through wavelet coefficient scaling. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 9, 8 (2000), 1437--1440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Foley, J., van Dam, A., Feiner, S., and Hughes, J. Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice, 2nd edition. Addison Wesley, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gooch, B., Reinhard, E., Moulding, C., and Shirley, P. Artistic composition for image creation. Proceedings of the 12th Eurographics workshop on Rendering Technique. 83--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Graham, D. Composing Pictures. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Grill, T., and Scanlon, M. Photographic Composition Guidelines for Total image control through effective design. AMPHOTO, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Itti, L., and Koch, C. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research 40 (2000), 1489--1506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Itti, L., Koch, C., and Niebur, E. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20 (1998), 1254--1259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jacob, R. J. Eye-movement-based human-computer interaction techniques: Toward non-command interfaces. 151--190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobs, C., Li, W., Schrier, E., Bargeron, D., and Salesin, D. Adaptive grid-based document layout. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3 (2003), 838--847. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kendall, M. G. On the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 31 (1940), 324 --345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Li, S. Z., Zhu, L., Zhang, Z. Q., Blake, A., Zhang, H. J., and Shum, H. Statistical learning of multi-view face detection. Proceedings 7th European Conference on Computer Vision(ECCV 2002) 4 (2002), 67 --81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Li, Y., Sun, J., Tang, C.-K., and Shum, H.-Y. Lazy snapping. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3 (2004), 303--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Locher, P. J. The contribution of eye-movement research to an understanding of the nature of pictorial balance perception: a review of the literature. Empirical Studies of the Arts 14, 2 (1996), 146--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Locher, P. J., Stappers, P. J., and Overbeeke, K. The role of balance as an organizing design principle underlying adults' compositional strategies for creating visual displays. Acta Psychologica 99 (1998), 141--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Locher, P. J., Stappers, P. J., and Overbeeke, K. An empirical evaluation of the visual rightness theory of pictorial composition. Acta Psychologica 103 (1999), 261--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Lok, S., Feiner, S., and Ngai, G. Evaluation of visual balance for automated layout. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interface. 101--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. McManus, I., Edmondson, D., and Rodgers, J. Balance in pictures. British Journal of Psychology 76 (1985), 73--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Peterson, B. Learning to see Creatively: How to compose great photographs. AMPHOTO, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Setlur, V., Takagi, S., Raskar, R., Gleicher, M., and Gooch, B. Automatic image retargeting. ACM SIGGRAPH Technical Sketch. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Suh, B., Ling, H., Bederson, B. B., and Jacobs, D. W. Automatic thumbnail cropping and it's effectivness. ACM Conference on User Interface and Software Technolgy (UIST 2003) (2003), 95--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Vertegaal, R. The gaze groupware system: Mediating joint attention in mutiparty communication and collaboration. Proceedings CHI '99. 294--301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Vertegaal, R. Designing attentive interfaces. Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA) Symposium 2002. 23--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Gaze-based interaction for semi-automatic photo cropping

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2006
      1353 pages
      ISBN:1595933727
      DOI:10.1145/1124772

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 April 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader