skip to main content
10.1145/1134285.1134403acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Managing exceptions in the medical workflow systems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over the years, medical informatics researchers have studied how to use software technologies to provide decision support for using evidence-based medical procedures. Software professionals have investigated how to support hospital administration, therapy and laboratory workflows. For many of these efforts, managing the exceptions in the workflows is a key issue since the medical workflows must cope with a wide variety of patient medical situations as well as those of the healthcare environments. This paper presents an analysis of past research in managing medical workflow exceptions, and proposes future research that would benefit the medical applications. The paper is focused on three topics: representing, handling and analyzing exceptions. Based upon our analysis, we believe that techniques for verifying exception management models and for handling dynamic exceptions should be useful and possibly essential for developing large scale, practical medical workflow systems.

References

  1. Aamodt, A. and Plaza, E. Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches. AI Communications, 7, 1, (1994), 39--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aigner, W. and Miksch, S. Supporting Protocol-Based Care in Medicine via Multiple Coordinated Views. In Proceedings International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization, (2004), 118--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Anderson, T., and Lee, P. A. Fault Tolerance Principles and Practice, Prentice Hall International, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Anyanwu, K., Sheth, A., Cardoso, J., Miller, J., and Kochut, K. Healthcare Enterprise Process Development and Integration. Technical report, University of Georgia, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ardissono, L., Leva, A. Di, Petrone, G., Segnan, M., and Sonnessa, M. Adaptive Medical Workflow Management for a Context-Dependent Home Healthcare Assistance Service. In Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Elsevier, (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Arkin, A. Business Process Modeling Language. (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Buhr, P. A. and Mok, W. Y. R. Advanced Exception Handling Mechanisms. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26, 9, (2000), 820--836. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Casati, F., Models, Semantics, and Formal Methods for the design of Workflows and their Exceptions. PhD thesis, Politecnico Di Milano, (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Casati, F., Ceri, S., Paraboschi, S., and Pozzi, G. Specification and Implementation of Exceptions in Workflow Management Systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 24, 3, (1999), 405--451. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chiu, D. K. W., Karlapalem, K., and Li, Q. Exception Handling with Workflow Evolution in ADOME-WFMS: a Taxonomy and Resolution Techniques. In CSCW Workshop: Towards Adaptive Workflow Systems, (Nov 14-18, 1998), Seattle, Washington. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cook, K. Evaluating acute abdominal pain in adults http://www.jaapa.com/issues/j20050301/articles/belly0305.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Dadam, P. and Reichert, M. Towards a new dimension in clinical information processing. Stud Health Technol Inform, 77, (2000), 295--301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dazzi, L. and Stefanelli, M. A patient workflow management system built on guidelines, In Proc. of AMIA 97, (1997), 146--150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Deiters, W., Goesmann, T., Just-Hahn K., Lefeler, T. and Rolles, R. Support for exception handling through workflow management systems. CSCW Workshop: Towards Adaptive Workflow Systems, (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dustdar, S., Hoffmann, T., and Aalst, W.v.d. Mining of ad-hoc Business Processes with TeamLog. Data and Knowledge Engineering, Elsevier, (Sep 2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Edelweiss, N. and Nicolao, M. Workflow Modeling: Exception and Failure Handling Representation. In SCCC '98: Proceedings of the XVIII International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society, (1998), 58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Eder, J. and Liebhert, W. Contributions to Exception Handling in Workflow Management. In Proceedings EDBT Workshop on Workflow Management Systems, (1998), 3--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Eder, J. and Liebhart, W. The Workflow Activity Model WAMO. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Garcia, A. F., Rubira, C. M. F., Romanovsky, A., and Xu, J. A Comparative Study of Exception Handling Mechanisms for Building Dependable Object-Oriented Software. Journal of Systems and Software, Elsevier, 59, 2, (Nov 2001), 197--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Georgakopoulos, D., Hornick, M., and Sheth, A. An overview of workflow management: from process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distributed Parallel Databases, 3, 2, (1995), 119--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Greiner, U., Ramsch, J., Heller, B., Löffler, M., Muller, R., Rahm, E. Adaptive Guideline-based Treatment Workflows with AdaptFlow. In Proc. of Symposium on Computerized Guidelines and Protocols, (2004), 113--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Grigori, D. Improving Business Process Quality through Exception Understanding, Prediction, and Prevention. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, (2001), 159--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hagen, C. and Alonso, G. Exception Handling in Workflow Management Systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26, (2000), 943--958. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hagen, C. and Alonso, G. Flexible Exception Handling in the OPERA Process Support System. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), (1998), 525--533. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Hwang, S., and Tang, J. Consulting past exceptions to facilitate workflow exception handling. Decision Support Systems, 37, 1, (2004), 49--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Klein, M., Dellarocas, C. A Knowledge-based Approach to Handling Exceptions in Workflow Systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 9, 3--4, (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kobayashi, M., Fussell, S. R., Xiao, Y., Seagull, F. J. Work coordination, workflow, and workarounds in a medical context. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Laprie, J. C. Ed. Dependability: Basic concepts and Terminology. Volume 5 of Dependable Computing and Fault-Tolerant Systems, Springer-Verlog, (1992). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Luo, Z., Sheth, A., Kochut, K., and Arpinar, B. Exception Handling for Conflict Resolution in Cross-Organizational Workflows. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 13, (2003), 271--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Luo, z., Sheth, A., Kochut, K., and Miller, J. Exception Handling in Workflow Systems. Applied Intelligence, 13, 2, (2000), 125--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Medeiros, A.d., Aalst, W.v.d. and Weijters, A. Workflow Mining: Current Status and Future Directions. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, (2003), Z. Tari R. Meersman and D.C. Schmidt, ed.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Ogasawara, T., Komatsu, H., and Nakatani, T. A study of exception handling and its dynamic optimization in Java. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA '01), (2001), 83--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Peleg, M., Boxwala, A. A., Ogunyemi, O., Zeng, Q., Tu, S., Lacson, R., Bernstam, E., Ash, N., Mork, P., Ohno-Machado, L., Shortliffe, E. H., Greenes, R. A. GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format. In Proc AMIA Symp., (2000), 645--653.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Poulymenopoulou, M. and Vassilacopoulos, G. A Web-based Workflow System for Emergency Healthcare. Medical Informatics Europ, (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Quaglini, S., Caffi, E., Cavallini, A., Micieli, G., and Stefanelli, M. Simulation of a Stroke Unit Careflow, Medinfo 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Quaglini, S., Stefanelli, M., Lanzola, G., Caporusso, V., and Panzarasa, S. Flexible guideline-based patient careflow systems. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 22, 1, (2001), 65--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Stiphout, R. van, Meijler, T. D., Aerts, A., Hammer, D., and Comte, R. le. TREX: Workflow TRansactions by Means of Exceptions. In Proceedings of WFMS'98 EDBT Workshop on Workflow Management Systems, (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sutton, D. R., and Fox, J. The Syntax and Semantics of the PROforma Guideline Modeling Language. J Am Med Inform Assoc., (Sep-Oct, 2003), 10, 5, 433--476.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Tu, S. W. and Musen M. A. A flexible approach to guideline modeling. In Proc AMIA Symp., (1999), 420--424.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Tucker, A. L., and Edmondson, A. Managing Routine Exceptions: A Model of Nurse Problem Solving Behavior. Advances in Health Care Management, 3, (2002), 87--113Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. WfMC. Workflow Process Definition Interface - XML Process Definition Language. Workflow Management Coalition Workflow Standard, (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Widom, J. and Ceri, S., Eds. Active Database Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA. (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Xu, J., Romanovsky, A., and Randell, B. Coordinated Exception Handling in Distributed Object Systems: From Model to System Implementation. In Proceedings of the 18th international Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 12, (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Managing exceptions in the medical workflow systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICSE '06: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering
        May 2006
        1110 pages
        ISBN:1595933751
        DOI:10.1145/1134285

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 May 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate276of1,856submissions,15%

        Upcoming Conference

        ICSE 2025

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader