skip to main content
10.1145/1145706.1145709acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Input interactions and context component based modelisations: differences and similarities

Published:23 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Since several years, ubiquitous computing and pervasive computing has emerged and, in particular, context-aware computing. Using mobile devices, the context is perpetually evolving, more than with standard workstation. In such environment, software must modify its behavior dynamically. An emerging way of programming an adaptive software is component programming.The focus of this paper is to review existing component approaches for input devices and for context especially those that consider component modeling. We aim at determining the similarities and differences between context and input devices in order to propose further a common component model architecture that will help building such intelligent applications.

References

  1. J. Accot and S. Zhai. In ACM CHI'97, pp 295--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Balakrishnan, T. Baudel et al. In ACM CHI'97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Baldauf, S. Dustdar et al. J. of Ad Hoc UbiComp 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. G. Biegel and V. Cahill. In IEEE PerCom'04.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. W. Buxton. ACM SIGGRAPH CG, 17(1):31--37, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. K. Card, J. D. Mackinlay, and G. G. Robertson. ACM Trans. on Information Systems, 9(2):99--122, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. Chen and D. Kotz. In IEEE Work. on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Cheung, G. Joulie, F. Grillon et al. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol 5, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. N. H. Cohen, A. Purakayastha, L. Wong et al. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Mobile Data Management (MDM), 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Coutaz and G. Rey. In ACM CADUI, pp 283--302, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. K. Dey. Pattern Recognition Letters, 5(1):4--7, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. K. Dey, D. Salber, and G. D. Abowd. HCI, 16(2-4):97--166, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Dragicevic and J.-D. Fekete. In IHM-HCI, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Fitts. J. of Experimental Psychology, 46:381--391, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. Foley and V. Wallace. Proc. IEEE, 62(4):462--470, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Foley, V. Wallace, and P. Chan. IEEE Comp. Graph. and Appl., 4(11), nov 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. Glassey, G. Stevenson et al. In Work. on Middleware for Perv. and Ad Hoc Comp., Middleware, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. D. Gray and D. Salber. In IFIP Int. Conf. on Engineering for HCI, LNCS 2254, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Greenberg and C. Fitchett. In ACM UIST 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. K. Henricksen and J. Indulska. In IEEE Work. CoMoRea, pp 33--37, mar 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. K. Henricksen and J. Indulska. J of Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2(1):37--64, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. K. Hinckley, J. Tullio, R. F. Pausch et al. In ACM UIST'97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R. J. Jacob and L. E. Sibert. In ACM CHI, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. D. Lingrand, S. Lavirotte, and J.-Y. Tigli. In Workshop CAMS (OTM), LNCS 3762, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J. D. Mackinlay, S. K. Card et al. HCI, 5:145--190, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. P. K. McKinley, S. M. Sadjadi, E. P. Kasten et al. IEEE Computer, 37(7):56--64, jul 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. A.-M. Pinna-Déry and J. Fierstone. In Mobile HCI 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Resnick. Comm. of the ACM, 36(7):64--71, jul 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. T. Starner IEEE Micro, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Input interactions and context component based modelisations: differences and similarities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CAI '06: Proceedings of the international workshop in conjunction with AVI 2006 on Context in advanced interfaces
      May 2006
      51 pages
      ISBN:9781450378147
      DOI:10.1145/1145706

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 May 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader