ABSTRACT
Packet-level diversity, or distributing packet transmissions over multiple, diverse channels, offers benefits in improving communication performance and robustness to channel variations. Previous works have analyzed and quantified those benefits, and developed transmission policies to realize them. However, translating those benefits into practice still faces numerous challenges from uncertainty in the adequacy of the channel models used to develop policies, to implementation dificulties in realizing the precise transmission schedules they mandate. This work is a first step in assessing what remains of those benefits once confronted with such practical challenges. Our investigation is carried out over an 802.11 testbed, where diversity is realized through the different frequency bands available for transmissions between hosts and access points. We use the testbed to evaluate the impact of transmission policies, channel characteristics, channel correlation, and various end-system constraints that affect our ability to precisely control transmissions timing. Our investigation reveals that in spite of the many gaps that exist between theory and practice, packet-level diversity still provides a simple solution to improve transmission performance and robustness across a broad range of configurations.
- B. Abdouni, W. Cheng, A. L. Chow, L. Golubchik, W. -J. Lee, and J. C. Lui. Multi-pathstreaming: Optimization and evaluation. In Proc. of MMCN '05, San Jose, CA,January 2005.Google Scholar
- D. Aguayo, J. Bicket, S. Biswas, G. Judd, and R. Morris. Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network. In Proc. of SIGCOMM '04, Portland, OR, August 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Ayano. glu, C. -L. I, R. Gitlin, and J. Mazo. Diversity coding for transparent self-healing and fault-tolerant communication networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 41(11), November 1993.Google Scholar
- E. Biersack. Performance evaluation of forward error correction in an ATM environment. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 11(4):631--640, May 1993.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Chandra, P. Bahl, and P. Bahl. MultiNet: Connecting to multiple IEEE 802.11 networks using a single wireless card. In Proc. of INFOCOM '04, Hong Kong, China, March 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Diggavi, N. Al-Dhahir, A. Stamoulis, and A. Calderbank. Great expectations: The value of spatial diversity in wireless networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(2), February 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Draves, J. Padhye, and B. Zill. Routing in multi-radio, multi-hop wireless mesh networks. In Proc. of MobiCom '04, Philadelphia, PA, September/October 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Golubchik, J. C. Lui, T. Tung, A. L. Chow, W. -J. Lee, G. Franceschinis, and C. Anglano. Multi-path continuous media streaming: What are the benefits? Performance Evaluation, 39, September 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Herzel, G. Fischer, and H. Gustat. An integrated CMOS RF synthesizer for 802.11a wireless LAN. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 38(10), October 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Karrer, A. Sabharwal, and E. Knightly. Enabling large-scale wireless broadband: The case for TAPs. In Proc. of HotNets '03, Cambridge, MA, November 2003.Google Scholar
- H. Lundgren, D. Lundberg, J. Nielsen, E. Nordström, and C. Tschudin. A large-scale testbed for reproducible ad hoc protocol evaluations. In Proc. of WCNC '02, Orlando, FL, March 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Miu, H. Balakrishnan, and C. E. Koksal. Improving loss resilience with multi-radio diversity in wireless networks. In Proc. of MobiCom '05, Cologne, Germany, August/September 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Rabin. Efficient dispersal of information for security, load balancing, and fault tolerance. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 36(2):335--348, April 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Raychaudhri, I. Seskar, M. Ott, S. Ganu, K. Ramachandran, H. Kremo, R. Siracusa, H. Liu, and M. Singh. Overview of the ORBIT radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols. In Proc. of WCNC '05, New Orleans, LA, March 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Robinson, K. Papagiannaki, C. Diot, X. Guo, and L. Krishnamurthy. Experimenting with a multi-radio mesh networking testbed. In Proc. of the 1st WiNMee '05, Trentino, Italy, April 2005.Google Scholar
- N. Shacham and P. McKenney. Packet recovery in high-speed networks using coding and buffer management. In Proc. INFOCOM '90, San Francisco, CA, April 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Tsirigos and Z. Haas. Analysis of multipath routing-Part I:The effect on the packet delivery ratio. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 3(1),January 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. H. Vaidya, J. Bernhard, V. V. Veeravalli, P. R. Kumar, and R. K. Iyer. Illinois wireless wind tunnel: A testbed for experimental evaluation of wireless networks. In Proc. of the E-WIND workshop (at SIGCOMM '05), Philadelphia, PA, August 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Vergetis, R. Guérin, and S. Sarkar. Improving performance through channel diversity in the presence of bursty losses. In Proc. of the 19th International Teletraffic Congress (ITC), Beijing, China, August/September 2005.Google Scholar
- E. Vergetis, R. Guérin, and S. Sarkar. Realizing the benefits of user-level channel diversity. ACM Computer Communication Review, 35(5), October 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. White, J. Lepreau, and S. Guruprasad. Lowering the barrier to wireless and mobile experimentation. In Proc. of HotNets-I, Princeton, NJ, October 2002.Google Scholar
- A. Willig, M. Kubisch, C. Hoene, and A. Wolisz. Measurements of a wireless link in an industrial environment using an IEEE 802.11-compliant physical layer. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 49(6), December 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Z. Wu, S. Ganu, I. Seskar, and D. Raychaudhri. Experimental investigation of PHY layer rate control and frequency selection in 802.11-based ad-hoc networks. In Proc. of the E-WIND workshop (at SIGCOMM '05), Philadelphia, PA, August 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. D. Yarvis, W. S. Conner, L. Krishnamurthy, and A. Mainwaring. Real-world experiences with an interactive ad hoc sensor network. In Proc. of ICPPW '02, Vancouver, Canada, August 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Zhang and W. Li. An integrated environemt for testing mobile ad-hoc networks. In Proc. of MobiHoc '02, Lausanne, Switzerland, June 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
Packet-level diversity - from theory to practice: an 802.11-based experimental investigation
Recommendations
Realizing the benefits of user-level channel diversity
Channel or path diversity is known to improve performance in physical layer designs, channel access strategies, path switching mechanisms, etc. In this paper, we focus on "user-level" mechanisms that operate simply by distributing packet transmissions ...
MIMO Channel Diversity Analysis Using Angles Between Complex Baseband Channel Impulse Responses
ICTRS 2020: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Telecommunications and Remote SensingMIMO channel analysis typically includes capacity; a more diverse channel will result in increased channel capacity. Many statistical measures for wireless channels exist but throughput performance ultimately is determined through the orthogonality of ...
Exploiting Multiuser MIMO in the IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN Systems
By adopting multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) antenna technologies, IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs are evolving into high speed systems. While only one user can transmit at a time in the conventional IEEE 802.11 systems, we investigate the possibility of ...
Comments