ABSTRACT
Formal accounts of how proposals are prepared in the contemporary workplace are scarce. In particular, researchers have published very few reports based on structured studies of proposal writing. This paper offers an overview of the current state of our knowledge about proposal writing in the contemporary workplace. Drawing upon data from a case study, the paper then advances an argument for the field to develop an increasingly sophisticated understanding of proposal development as a complex information gathering and design activity
- BOWMAN, J.P., AND BRANCHAW, B.P. How to write proposals that produce. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.Google Scholar
- CROSS, G.A. Forming the collective mind: A contextual exploration of large-scale collaborative writing in industry. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, 2001.Google Scholar
- FREED, R.C., AND ROMANO, J. Writing winning business proposals: Your guide to landing the client, making the sale, and persuading the boss. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003.Google Scholar
- GOOCH, J.C. The dynamics and challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration: A case study of "cortical depth bench" in group proposal writing. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PROFESSIONAL WRITING, 48 (2005), 177--200.Google ScholarCross Ref
- HACKOS, J.T. Managing your documentation projects. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- HART-DAVIDSON, W. Modeling document-mediated interaction. In ACM SIGDOC 2002 Conference Proceedings. ACM, Inc., New York, 2002, pp. 60--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- HART-DAVIDSON, W. On writing, technical communication, and information technology: The core competencies of technical communication. Technical Communication, 48 (2001), 145--155.Google Scholar
- HART-DAVIDSON, W. Seeing the project: Mapping patterns of intra-team communication events. In ACM SIGDOC 2003 Conference Proceedings. ACM, Inc., New York, 2003, pp. 28--34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- KENT-DRURY, R. Bridging boundaries, negotiating differences: The nature of leadership in cross-functional proposal-writing groups. Technical Communication, 47 (2000), 90--98.Google Scholar
- MCCAAN, D. Winning business proposals. Dublin, Ireland: Oak Tree Press, 2000.Google Scholar
- MCISAAC, C.M., AND M.A. ASCHAUER. Proposal writing at Atherton Jordan, Inc.: An Ethnographic Study. Management Communication Quarterly, 3 (1990), 527--60.Google ScholarCross Ref
- MINER, L.E., J.T. MINER, AND J. GRIFFITH. Proposal planning and writing. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press, 1998.Google Scholar
- Minto, B. The Minto pyramid principle: Logic in writing, thinking, & problem solving. Minto International, London, 1996.Google Scholar
- RAMEY, J. What technical communicators think about measuring value added: Report on a questionnaire. Technical Communication, 42 (1995), 40--51.Google Scholar
- REDISH, J. Adding value as a professional technical communicator. Technical Communication 42 (1995), 26--39.Google Scholar
- REDISH, J., AND RAMEY, J. Measuring the value added by professional technical communicators. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 36 (1993), 158--164.Google ScholarCross Ref
- SPINUZZI, C. Modeling genre ecologies. In Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on computer documentation (2002), ACM Press, pp. 200--207. Google ScholarDigital Library
- SPINUZZI, C. Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- SPINUZZI, C., AND ZACHRY, M. Genre ecologies: An opensystem approach to understanding and constructing documentation. ACM J. Comput. Doc. 24, 3 (2000), 169--181. Google ScholarDigital Library
- STEWART, R.D., AND STEWART, A.L. Proposal preparation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.Google Scholar
- TRACEY, J.R. STOP, GO, and the state of the art in proposal writing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 35 (1992), 143--155.Google ScholarCross Ref
- VAKKARI, P., AND PENNANEN, M. Sources, relevance and contributory information of documents in writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 2 (2001), 217--232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- WINSOR, D.A. Writing power: Communication in an engineering center. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 2003.Google Scholar
- ZACHRY, M. The ecology of an online education site in professional communication. In Proceedings of IEEE professional communication society international professional communication conference and Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM international conference on Computer documentation (2000), IEEE Educational Activities Department, pp. 433--442. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zachry, M. Regulation and communicative practices: An introduction. In Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations, Eds. M. Zachry and C. Thralls. Baywood, Amityville, New York, 2006.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Researching proposal development: accounting for the complexity of designing persuasive texts
Recommendations
Advances in understanding knowledge work: an experience report
SIGDOC '08: Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communicationExtending our ongoing investigation into the communicative practices of knowledge work, we have made recent advances on three different fronts: methodological framing, investigation of work practices and potential support tools, and application ...
Chains and ecologies: methodological notes toward a communicative-mediational model of technologically mediated writing
SIGDOC '06: Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM international conference on Design of communicationStudies of knowledge work tend to take one of two research foci: either on communication (the transactional, intersubjective exchange of information, thoughts, writing, or speech among participants, performed in serial chains) or mediation (the ...
Visualizing writing activity as knowledge work: challenges & opportunities
SIGDOC '06: Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM international conference on Design of communicationDigital environments enable distributed work. Though they pose challenges for research, they also provide affordances for addressing these difficulties including opportunities to capture and visualize writing activity in significant detail. This paper ...
Comments