skip to main content
10.1145/1166324.1166359acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Researching proposal development: accounting for the complexity of designing persuasive texts

Published:18 October 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Formal accounts of how proposals are prepared in the contemporary workplace are scarce. In particular, researchers have published very few reports based on structured studies of proposal writing. This paper offers an overview of the current state of our knowledge about proposal writing in the contemporary workplace. Drawing upon data from a case study, the paper then advances an argument for the field to develop an increasingly sophisticated understanding of proposal development as a complex information gathering and design activity

References

  1. BOWMAN, J.P., AND BRANCHAW, B.P. How to write proposals that produce. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. CROSS, G.A. Forming the collective mind: A contextual exploration of large-scale collaborative writing in industry. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. FREED, R.C., AND ROMANO, J. Writing winning business proposals: Your guide to landing the client, making the sale, and persuading the boss. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. GOOCH, J.C. The dynamics and challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration: A case study of "cortical depth bench" in group proposal writing. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PROFESSIONAL WRITING, 48 (2005), 177--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. HACKOS, J.T. Managing your documentation projects. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. HART-DAVIDSON, W. Modeling document-mediated interaction. In ACM SIGDOC 2002 Conference Proceedings. ACM, Inc., New York, 2002, pp. 60--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. HART-DAVIDSON, W. On writing, technical communication, and information technology: The core competencies of technical communication. Technical Communication, 48 (2001), 145--155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. HART-DAVIDSON, W. Seeing the project: Mapping patterns of intra-team communication events. In ACM SIGDOC 2003 Conference Proceedings. ACM, Inc., New York, 2003, pp. 28--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. KENT-DRURY, R. Bridging boundaries, negotiating differences: The nature of leadership in cross-functional proposal-writing groups. Technical Communication, 47 (2000), 90--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. MCCAAN, D. Winning business proposals. Dublin, Ireland: Oak Tree Press, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. MCISAAC, C.M., AND M.A. ASCHAUER. Proposal writing at Atherton Jordan, Inc.: An Ethnographic Study. Management Communication Quarterly, 3 (1990), 527--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. MINER, L.E., J.T. MINER, AND J. GRIFFITH. Proposal planning and writing. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Minto, B. The Minto pyramid principle: Logic in writing, thinking, & problem solving. Minto International, London, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. RAMEY, J. What technical communicators think about measuring value added: Report on a questionnaire. Technical Communication, 42 (1995), 40--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. REDISH, J. Adding value as a professional technical communicator. Technical Communication 42 (1995), 26--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. REDISH, J., AND RAMEY, J. Measuring the value added by professional technical communicators. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 36 (1993), 158--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. SPINUZZI, C. Modeling genre ecologies. In Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on computer documentation (2002), ACM Press, pp. 200--207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. SPINUZZI, C. Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. SPINUZZI, C., AND ZACHRY, M. Genre ecologies: An opensystem approach to understanding and constructing documentation. ACM J. Comput. Doc. 24, 3 (2000), 169--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. STEWART, R.D., AND STEWART, A.L. Proposal preparation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. TRACEY, J.R. STOP, GO, and the state of the art in proposal writing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 35 (1992), 143--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. VAKKARI, P., AND PENNANEN, M. Sources, relevance and contributory information of documents in writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 2 (2001), 217--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. WINSOR, D.A. Writing power: Communication in an engineering center. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. ZACHRY, M. The ecology of an online education site in professional communication. In Proceedings of IEEE professional communication society international professional communication conference and Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM international conference on Computer documentation (2000), IEEE Educational Activities Department, pp. 433--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Zachry, M. Regulation and communicative practices: An introduction. In Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations, Eds. M. Zachry and C. Thralls. Baywood, Amityville, New York, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Researching proposal development: accounting for the complexity of designing persuasive texts

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGDOC '06: Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication
      October 2006
      224 pages
      ISBN:1595935231
      DOI:10.1145/1166324

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 October 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader