skip to main content
article

Modeling spatially correlated data in sensor networks

Published:01 November 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The physical phenomena monitored by sensor networks, for example, forest temperature or water contamination, usually yield sensed data that are strongly correlated in space. With this in mind, researchers have designed a large number of sensor network protocols and algorithms that attempt to exploit such correlations.There is an increasing need to synthetically generate large traces of spatially correlated data representing a wide range of conditions to carefully study the performance of these algorithms. Further, a mathematical model for generating synthetic traces would provide guidelines for designing more efficient algorithms. These reasons motivate us to obtain a simple and accurate model of spatially correlated sensor network data.The proposed model is Markovian in nature and can capture correlation in data irrespective of the node density, the number of source nodes, or the topology. We describe a rigorous mathematical procedure and a simple practical method to extract the model parameters from real traces. We also show how to efficiently generate synthetic traces on a given topology using these parameters. The correctness of the model is verified by statistically comparing synthetic and real data. Further, the model is validated by comparing the performance of algorithms whose behavior depends on the degree of spatial correlation in data, under real and synthetic traces. The real traces are obtained from remote sensing data, publicly available sensor data, and sensor networks that we deploy. We show that the proposed model is more general and accurate than the commonly used jointly Gaussian model. Finally, we create tools that can be easily used by researchers to synthetically generate traces of any size and degree of correlation.

References

  1. Chou, J., Petrovic, D., and Ramchandran, K. 2002. Tracking and exploiting correlations in dense sensor networks. In Conference Record of the 36th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cover, T. M. and Thomas, J. A. 1991. Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cressie, N. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cristescu, R., Beferull-Lozano, B., and Vetterli, M. 2004. On network correlated data gathering. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom'04.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cristescu, R. and Vetterli, M. 2005. On the optimal density for real-time data gathering of spatio-temporal processes in sensor networks. In Proceedings of IPSN'05. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Doherty, L. and Pister, K. 2004. Scattered data selection for dense sensor networks. In Proceedings of IPSN'04. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Deshpande, A., Guestrin, C., Madden, S., Hellerstein, J., and Hong, W. 2004. Model driven data acquisition in sensor networks. In 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 2004). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Faruque, J. and Helmy, A. 2004. Rugged: Routing on fingerprint gradients in sensor networks. In IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Services (ICPS'04). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ganesan, D., Estrin, D., and Heidemann, J. 2002. Dimensions: Why do we need a new data handling architecture for sensor networks? 1st Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (Hotnets-I).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ganesan, D., Greenstein, B., Perelyubskiy, D., Estrin, D., and Heidemann, J. 2003. An evaluation of multiresolution storage for sensor networks. In SenSys'03. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Goel, A. and Estrin, D. 2003. Simultaneous optimization for concave costs: single sink aggregation or single source buy-at-bulk. In SODA. 499--505. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Goovaerts, P. 1997. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. INT. 2004. Intel lab data, http://berkeley.intel-research.net/labdata.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Intanagonwiwat, C., Estrin, D., Govindan, R., and Heidemann, J. 2002. Impact of network density on data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. In ICDCS. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jindal, A. and Psounis, K. 2004. Modeling spatially-correlated sensor network data. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Sensor and Ad hoc Communications and Networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanwal, R. P. 1997. Linear Integral Equations: Theory and Technique. Birkhauser Boston Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kargupta, H., Joshi, A., Sivakumar, K., and Yesha, Y. 2003. Data Mining: Next Generation Challenges and Future Directions. AAAI/MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Krishnamachari, B., Estrin, D., and Wicker, S. B. 2002. The impact of data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. In ICDCS Workshop on Distributed Event-based Systems (DEBS). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kythe, P. K. and Puri, P. 2002. Computation Methods for Linear Integral Equations. Birkhauser Boston Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, L. 1999. Measures of distributional similarity. In Proceedings of the 37th ACL. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, S. Z. 2001. Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu, F., Shen, S., Anh, V., and Turner, I. 2004. Analysis of a discrete non-markovian random walk approximation for the time fractional diffusion equation. In Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Computational Techniques and Applications Conference (CTAC'04).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Marco, D., Duarte-Melo, E., Liu, M., and Neuhoff, D. 2003. On the many-to-one transport capacity of a dense wireless sensor network and the compressibility of its data. In Proceedings of IPSN'03. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Olea, R. A. 1999. Geostatistics for Engineers and Earth Scientists. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Paek, J., Chintalapudi, K., Caffrey, J., Govindan, R., and Masri, S. 2005. A wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring: performance and experience. 2nd IEEE Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pattem, S., Krishnmachari, B., and Govindan, R. 2004. The impact of spatial correlation on routing with compression in wireless sensor networks. In Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Porter, D. and Stirling, D. S. 1990. Integral Equations: A Practical Treatment from Spectral Theory to Applications. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Psounis, K., Zhu, A., Prabhakar, B., and Motwani, R. 2004. Modeling correlations in web-traces and implications for designing replacement policies. Comput. Netw. J. Elsevier. 45, 4, 379--398. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Rahimi, M., Pon, R., Kaiser, W. J., Sukhatme, G. S., Estrin, D., and Srivastava, M. 2004. Adaptive sampling for environmental robotics. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Venables, W. and Ripley, B. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Vuran, M. C. and Akyildiz, I. F. 2006. Spatial correlation-based collaborative medium access control in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., to appear. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Whitehouse, K. and Culler, D. 2002. Calibration as parameter estimation in sensor networks. In Proceedings of WSNA'02. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Widmann, M. and Bretherton, C. http://tao.atmos.washington.edu/data-sets/widmann. 50 km resolution daily precipitation for the pacific northwest, 1949-1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Yu, Y., Estrin, D., Govindan, R., and Rahimi, M. 2004. Using more realistic data models to evaluate sensor network data processing algorithms. 1st IEEE Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Yu, Y., Ganesan, D., Girod, L., Estrin, D., and Govindan, R. 2003. Synthetic data generation to support irregular sampling in sensor networks. In Geo Sensor Networks 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Modeling spatially correlated data in sensor networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader