Abstract
We examined graphical representations of aircraft altitude in simulated air traffic control (ATC) displays. In two experiments, size and contrast cues correlated with altitude improved participants' ability to detect future aircraft collisions (conflicts). Experiment 1 demonstrated that, across several set sizes, contrast and size cues to altitude improved accuracy at identifying conflicts. Experiment 2 demonstrated that graphical cues for representing altitude both improved accuracy and reduced search time for finding conflicts in large set size displays. The addition of size and contrast cues to ATC displays may offer specific benefits in aircraft conflict detection.
- Anstis, S. M. 1974. A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision Research 14, 589--592.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beck, J. 1994. Interference in the perceived segregation of equal-luminance element-arrangement texture patterns. Perception & Psychophysics 56, 4, 424--430.Google Scholar
- Benel, R. A. 1998. Workstation and software interface design in air traffic control. In Human Factors in Air Traffic Control, M. W. Smolensky and E. S., Stein, Eds. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 17--63.Google Scholar
- Burnett, M. S. and Barfield, W. 1991. Perspective vs. plan-view air traffic control displays: Survey and empirical results. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 35th Meeting. 87--91.Google Scholar
- Clausner, T. C. 2002. How conceptual metaphors are productive of spatial-graphical expressions. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 208--213.Google Scholar
- Clausner, T. C. and Croft, W. 1997. Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science 21, 247--282.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clausner, T. C. and Croft, W. 1999. Domains and Image Schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10, 1--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Da Vinci, L. c. 1492. Della prospettiva aerea {Of aerial perspective}. In The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci, J. P., Richter (Transl., 1883/1970). Dover, London, UK. 159--166.Google Scholar
- Duncan, J. and Humphreys, G. W. 1989. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 96, 433--458.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., and Garbard, H. 1984. Searching for conjunctively-defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 10, 32--39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ellis, S. R. and Palmer, E. A. 1981. Threat perception while viewing single intruder conflicts on a cockpit display of traffic information (NASA TM 81341), NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.Google Scholar
- Ellis, S. R., McGreevy, M. W., and Hitchcock, R. J. 1987. Perspective traffic display format and airline pilot traffic avoidance. Human Factors 29, 4, 371--382. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gibson, E. 1969. Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development. Appleton-Century-Crofts, East Norwalk, CT.Google Scholar
- He, Z. J. and Nakayama, K. 1992. Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature (London) 359, 6392, 231--233.Google Scholar
- Healey, C. G., Booth, K. S. and Enns, J. T. 1996. High-speed visual estimation using preattentive processing. ACM: Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 3, 2, 107--135. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hochberg, J. E. and Mcalister, E. 1955. Relative size vs. familiar size in the perception of represented depth. American Journal of Psychology 68, 294--296.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Holway, A. F., and Boring, E. G. 1941. Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant. American Journal of Psychology 54, 21--37.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hunt, S. M. J. 1994. MacProbe: A Macintosh-based experimenter's workstation for the cognitive sciences. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 26, 3, 345--351.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. 1987. The body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Johnston, J. C., Horlitz, K. L. and Edmiston, R. W. 1993. Improving situation awareness displays for air traffic controllers. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, R. S. Jensch and D. Neumeister, Eds. Ohio State University, Columbus, Off.Google Scholar
- Kellman, P. J. 2002. Perceptual learning. In Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology, 3rd edition, Vol. 3: Learning, Motivation and Emotion, R. Gallistel, Ed. Wiley, & NY.Google Scholar
- Kellman, P. J. and Kaiser, 1994. Perceptual learning modules in flight training. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 1183--1187.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought A. Ortony, 2nd ed. A Ortong, Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science 4, 195--208.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nichols, S. and Patel, H. 2002. Health and safety implications of virtual reality: A review of empirical evidence. Applied Ergonomics 33, 3, 251--271.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rayner, K., Mcconkie, G. W. and Zola, D. 1980. Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology 12, 2, 206--226.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., and Ruthruff, E. 2000. Visual search in complex displays: Factors affecting conflict detection by air traffic controllers. Human Factors 42, 5, 349--366.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roske-Hofstrand, R. J. and Murphy, E. D. 1998. Human information processing in air traffic control. Human Factors in Air Traffic Control, M. W. Smolensky, and E. S. Stein, Eds. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 65--114.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. D., Ellis, S. R., and Lee, E. C. 1984. Perceived threat and avoidance maneuvers in response to cockpit traffic displays. Human Factors 26, 33--48.Google ScholarCross Ref
- St. John, M., Cowen, M. B., Smallman, H. S., and Oonk, H. M. 2001. The use of 2D and 3D displays for shape-understanding versus relative-position tasks. Human Factors 43, 1, 79--98.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stenger, A. J., Zimmerlin, T. A., Thomas, J. P., and Braunstein, M. L., 1981. Advanced computer image generation techniques exploiting perceptual characteristics. US AFHRL Technical Report. TR 80--61.Google Scholar
- Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. 1980. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12, 1, 97--136.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wolfe, J. M. 1994. Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1, 202--238.Google Scholar
- Wolfe, J. M. 1998. What can 1, 000, 000 trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science 9, 1, 33--39.Google Scholar
- Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., and Franzel, S. L. 1989. Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 15, 419--433.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wolfe, J. M. and Horowitz, T. S. 2004. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5, 1--7.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Enhancing air traffic displays via perceptual cues
Recommendations
Investigating Communication Infrastructure of Next Generation Air Traffic Management
ICCPS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/ACM Third International Conference on Cyber-Physical SystemsGrowing demand for use of the National Airspace System (NAS) has resulted in research and development programs to modernize the air traffic control system. The primary focus of the US FAA's Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) plan is to ...
Modeling of air/ground air traffic control communications for fast-time simulation
MS'06: Proceedings of the 17th IASTED international conference on Modelling and simulationA fast-time simulation model of air traffic in the National Airspace System (NAS), developed by the Center for Advanced Aviation System Development (CAASD) of the MITRE Corporation, has been used over the past several years for capacity and delay ...
A multiagent approach to managing air traffic flow
Intelligent air traffic flow management is one of the fundamental challenges facing the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) today. FAA estimates put weather, routing decisions and airport condition induced delays at 1,682,700 h in 2007 (FAA OPSNET ...
Comments