skip to main content
research-article

A tone-mapping operator for road visibility experiments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 May 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

One may wish to use computer graphic images to carry out road visibility studies. Unfortunately, most display devices still have a limited luminance dynamic range, especially in driving simulators. In this paper, we propose a tone-mapping operator (TMO) to compress the luminance dynamic range while preserving the driver's performance for a visual task relevant for a driving situation. We address three display issues of some consequences for road image display: luminance dynamics, image quantization, and high minimum displayable luminance. Our TMO characterizes the effects of local adaptation with a bandpass decomposition of the image using a Laplacian pyramid, and processes the levels separately in order to mimic the human visual system. The contrast perception model uses the visibility level, a usual index in road visibility engineering applications. To assess our algorithm, a psychophysical experiment devoted to a target detection task was designed. Using a Landolt ring, the visual performances of 30 observers were measured: they stared first at a high-dynamic range image and then at the same image processed by a TMO and displayed on a low-dynamic range monitor, for comparison. The evaluation was completed with a visual appearance evaluation. Our operator gives good performances for three typical road situations (one in daylight and two at night), after comparison with four standard TMOs from the literature. The psychovisual assessment of our TMO is limited to these driving situations.

References

  1. Adrian, W. 1989. Visibility of targets: model for calculation. Lighting Research and Technology 21, 181--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Brémond, R. and Gallée, G. 2002. Image quality for driving simulation experiments. In Proc. of Driving Simulation Conference 2002. INRETS-Renault.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Burt, P. J. and Adelson, E. H. 1983. The laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Transactions on Communications 31, 4 (Ap.), 532--540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Campbell, F. and Robson, J. 1968. Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. Journal of Physiology 197, 551--566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. CIE. 1981. An Analytic Model for Describing the Influence of Lighting Parameters upon Visual Performance. Report 19/2.1. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. CIE. 1988. Roadsigns. Report 74. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. CIE. 1992. Contrast and Visibility. Report 95. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. CIE. 1996. The Relationship between Digital and Colorimetric Data for Computer-Controlled CRT Displays. Report 122. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. CIE. 1999. Visual Adaptation to Complex Luminance Distribution. Report 135/5. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Drago, F., Martens, W. L., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H.-P. 2003. Perceptual evaluation of tone mapping operators. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Sketches & Applications. ACM Press, New York. 1--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dupuis, M. and Grezlikowski, H. 2006. Opendrive, an open standard for the description of roads for driving simulations. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Europe. INRETS-Renault, 25--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferwerda, J. A. 2001. Elements of early vision for computer graphics. In IEEE computer graphics and applications. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. 21--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ferwerda, J. A., Pattanaik, S. N., Shirley, P., and Greenberg, D. P. 1996. A model of visual adaptation for realistic image synthesis. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH '96. ACM, New York. 249--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ginsburg, A. P. 1986. Chapter 34: spatial filtering and visual form perception. In Handbook of Perception and Visual Performance, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufmann, and J. P. Thomas, Eds. Wiley, New York. 1--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Grave, J. and Brémond, R. 2005. Designing a tone mapping algorithm for road visibility experiments. In APGV '05: Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. ACM Press, New York. 168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hills, B. L. 1980. Vision, visibility, and perception in driving. Perception 9, 183--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Hoc, J.-M. 2001. Towards ecological validity of research in cognitive ergonomics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science 2, 3, 278--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Ishida, T. and Iriyama, K. 2003. Estimating light adaptation levels for visual environments with complicated luminance distribution. In Proceedings of the 25th Session of CIE. D, vol. 1. CIE. 10--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelly, D. H. 1985. Visual processing of moving stimuli. In Journal of the Optical Society of America. 2, vol. 2. 216--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuang, J., Yamaguchi, H., Johnson, G., and Fairchild, M. 2004. Testing hdr image rendering algorithms. In Proceedings of IS and T/SID 12th Color Imaging Conference: Color Science and Engineering Systems, Technologies, Applications. SID, 315--320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Larson, G. W., Rushmeier, H., and Piatko, C. 1997. A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Compter Graphics. 291--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ledda, P., Santos, L. P., and Chalmers, A. 2004. A local model of eye adaptation for high dynamic range images. In AFRIGRAPH '04: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality, Visualisation and Interaction in Africa. ACM Press, New York. 151--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ledda, P., Chalmers, A., Troscianko, T., and Seetzen, H. 2005. Evaluation of tone mapping operators using a high dynamic range display. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH '05. 249--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Li, Y., Sharan, L., and Adelson, E. H. 2005. Compressing and companding high dynamic range images with subband architectures. ACM Transactions on Graphics 24, 3, 836--844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Moon, P. and Spencer, D. 1945. The visual effect of non-uniform surrounds. Journal of the Optical Society of America 35, 3, 233--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. MOVE. 2005. Performance based model for mesopic photometry. Helsinki University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Pattanaik, S. N., Ferwerda, J. A., Fairchild, M. D., and Greenberg, D. P. 1998. A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic image display. Computer Graphics 32, Annual Conference Series. 287--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Pattanaik, S. N., Tumblin, J., Yee, H., and Greenberg, D. P. 2000. Time-dependent visual adaptation for fast realistic image display. In In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2000. ACM, New York. 47--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Peli, E. 1990. Contrast in complex images. Journal of the Optical Society of America 7, 1 (Oct.), 2032--2040.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Reinhard, E., Stark, M., Shirley, P., and Ferwerda, J. 2002. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2002. 267--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Reinhard, E., Ward, G., Pattanaik, S., and Debevec, P. 2005. High dynamic range imaging: acquisition, display, and image based lighting. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Seetzen, H., Heidrich, W., Stuerzlinger, W., Ward, G., Whitehead, L., Trentacoste, M., Ghosh, A., and Vorozcovs, A. 2004. High dynamic range display systems. In Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2004. 3, vol. 23. 760--768. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Shapley, R. 1991. Chapter 12: Neural mechanisms of contrast sensitivity. In Spatial Vision, D. M. Regan, Ed., MacMillon, New York. 290--306.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, K., Krawczyk, G., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H.-P. 2006. Beyond tone mapping: Enhanced depiction of tone mapped hdr images. In Computer Graphics Forum, Proceedings of Eurographics 2006. 3, vol. 25. Eurographics, 427--438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Spencer, G., Shirley, P., Zimmerman, K., and Greenberg, D. 1995. Physically-based glare effects for computer generated images. Proceedings ACM SIGGRAPH '95. 325--334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Viénot, F., Boust, C., Costa, E. D., Brémond, R., and Dumont, E. 2002. Psychometric assessment of the look and feel of digital images. In Driving Simulation Conference. INRETS-Renault.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Ward, G. 1994. A contrast-based scalefactor for luminance display. Graphics Gems IV, 415--421. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yoshida, A., Blanz, V., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H.-P. 2005. Perceptual evaluation of tone mapping operators with real-world scenes. In Human Vision and Electronic Imaging X, IS& T/SPIE's 17th Annual Symposium on Electronic Imaging. SPIE Proceedings Series, vol. 5666. San Jose, CA. 192--203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Yoshida, A., Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H.-P. 2006. Analysis of reproducing real-world appearance on displays of varying dynamic range. In Computer Graphics Forum, Proceedings of Eurographics 2006. 3, vol. 25. Eurographics, 415--426.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A tone-mapping operator for road visibility experiments

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
          ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 5, Issue 2
          May 2008
          120 pages
          ISSN:1544-3558
          EISSN:1544-3965
          DOI:10.1145/1279920
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 May 2008
          • Accepted: 1 April 2007
          • Revised: 1 September 2006
          • Received: 1 July 2006
          Published in tap Volume 5, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader