skip to main content
10.1145/1281192.1281306acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

LungCAD: a clinically approved, machine learning system for lung cancer detection

Published:12 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present LungCAD, a computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system that employs a classification algorithm for detecting solid pulmonary nodules from CT thorax studies. We briefly describe some of the machine learning techniques developed to overcome the real world challenges in this medical domain. The most significant hurdle in transitioning from a machine learning research prototype that performs well on an in-house dataset into a clinically deployable system, is the requirement that the CAD system be tested in a clinical trial. We describe the clinical trial in which LungCAD was tested: a large scale multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) retrospective observational study to evaluate the effect of CAD in clinical practice for detecting solid pulmonary nodules from CT thorax studies. The clinical trial demonstrates that every radiologist that participated in the trial had a significantly greater accuracy with LungCAD, both for detecting nodules and identifying potentially actionable nodules; this, along with other findings from the trial, has resulted in FDA approval for LungCAD in late 2006.

References

  1. American Lung Association. Trends in lung cancer morbidity and mortality report. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. G. Armato-III, M. L. Giger, and H. MacMahon. Automated detection of lung nodules in CT scans: preliminary results. Medical Physics, 28(8):1552--1561, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. Bi and J. Liang. Multiple instance learning of pulmonary embolism detection with geodesic distance along vascular structure. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Bi, S. Periaswamy, K. Okada, T. Kubota, G. Fung, M. Salganicoff, and R. B. Rao. Computer aided detection via asymmetric cascade of sparse hyperplane classifiers. In Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Dundar and J. Bi. Joint optimization of cascaded classifiers for computer aided detection. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Dundar, G. Fung, J. Bi, S. Sandilya, and R. B. Rao. Sparse fisher discriminant analysis for computer aided detection. In Proceedings of SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Dundar, B. Krishnapuram, J. Bi, and R. B. Rao. Learning classifiers when the training data is not IID. In Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Food and Drug Administiration. Siemens Syngo lung CAD summary of safety and effectiveness, PMA No.0500022. October 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. G. Fung, M. Dundar, B. Krishnapuram, and R. B. Rao. Multiple instance algorithms for computer aided diagnosis. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Jemal, R. Siegel, E. Ward, T. Murray, J. Xu, and M. J.Thun. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin., 57:4366, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. P. Naidich, J. P. Ko, and J. Stoechek. Computer aided diagnosis: Impact on nodule detection amongst community level radiologist. A multi-reader study. In Proceedings of CARS 2004 Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, pages 902--907, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. N. A. Obuchowski. Nonparametric analysis of clustered roc curve data. Biometrics, 53:170--180, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. J. Swensen, J. R. Jett, T. E. Hartman, D. E. Midthun, S. J. Mandrekar, S. L. Hillman, A.-M. Sykes, G. L. Aughenbaugh, A. O. Bungum, and K. L. Allen. CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology, 235(1):259--265, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. V. Vural, G. Fung, B. Krishnapuram, J. Dy, and R. B. Rao. Batch-wise classification with applications to computer aided diagnosis. In Proceedings of European Conference on Machine Learning, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Wolf, A. Krishnan, M. Salganicoff, J. Bi, M. Dundar, G. Fung, J. Stoeckel, S. Periaswamy, H. Shen, P. Herzog, and D. P. Baidich. CAD performance analysis for pulmonary nodule detection on thin-slice MDCT scans. In H. Lemke, K. Inamura, K. Doi, M. Vannier, and A. Farman, editors, Proceedings of CARS 2005 Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, pages 1104--1108, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. X.-H. Zhou, N. A. Obuchowski, and D. K. McClish. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley, New York, NY, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. LungCAD: a clinically approved, machine learning system for lung cancer detection

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '07: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      August 2007
      1080 pages
      ISBN:9781595936097
      DOI:10.1145/1281192

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 August 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      KDD '07 Paper Acceptance Rate111of573submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader