skip to main content
10.1145/1294928.1294930acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A stakeholder-driven service life cycle model for SOA

Published:03 September 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Service-orientation is a relatively new paradigm aiming at developing software systems that are adaptive and dynamic. Service-oriented systems are developed by composing services that are shared across organizations. Because new roles and new development tasks are introduced in service-oriented development as opposed to traditional software engineering, a new approach to service life cycle management is required. In this paper, based on the observations of the state of the art in the field, we propose a stakeholder-driven service life cycle model for service oriented architecture (SOA). Horizontally, the model shows the activities that associated with the stakeholders in SOA. While vertically, the model shows the interactions and cooperation between the stakeholders. This model facilitates the researchers to gain further insight into service-oriented development and governance.

References

  1. D. J. Artus. Soa realization: Service design principles. developerWorks, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BEA. Aqualogic service registry. www.bea.com, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Elfatatry and P. Layzell. Negotiating in service-oriented environments. Commun. ACM, 47(8 (August 2004)):103--108, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. Erl. Service-Oriented Architecture: Concepts, Technology, and Design. Prentice Hall, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. IBM. Websphere service registry and repository v6.0.2, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Infravio. Soa adoption and governance, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Matsumura. The definitive guide to soa governance and lifecycle management, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. G. McBride. The role of soa quality management in soa service lifecycle management. developerWorks, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. T. Mitra. A case for soa governance. www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. OASIS. Universal description, discovery and integration v3.0.2 (uddi). cgi.omg.org/docs/formal/00-06-27.pdf, 19 July 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. OASIS. Oasis ebxml registry. www.oasis-open.org, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Orriens and J. Yang. Modeling and managing service oriented business collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Workshop on Middleware for Web Services (EDOC-MWS05), Enschede, The Netherlands, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. P. Papazoglou and W.-J. v. d. Heuvel. Service-oriented design and development methodology. Int. J. Web Engineering and Technology (IJWET), 2(4):412--442, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. P. Papazoglou, P. Traverso, S. Dustdar, and F. Leymann. Service-oriented computing research roadmap, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E. Pulier and H. Taylor. Understanding Enterprise SOA. Manning, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. G. So. The technologies behind soa governance. soa.sys-con.com/read/314081_2.htm, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sun. Sun soa enterpriseexcel, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sun. Sun's service registry. www.sun.com/products/soa/registry#registry, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Systinet. Soa governance: Balancing flexibility & control within an soa. Mercury White Paper, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. W. T. Tsai. Service-oriented system engineering: A new paradigm. In Service-Oriented System Engineering, 2005. SOSE 2005. IEEE International Workshop, pages 3--6, Beijing, China, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. W.-T. Tsai, X. Wei, R. Paul, J.-Y. Chung, Q. Huang, and Y. Chen. Service-oriented system engineering (sose) and its applications to embedded system development. Service Oriented Computing and Applications, pages 3--17, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. S. Vinoski. Invocation styles. IEEE Internet Computing, 7(4):83--85, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. T. Vitvar, M. Zaremba, and M. Moran. Dynamic service discovery through meta-interactions with service providers. In Proceedings of the 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2007). Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Q. Wall. Understanding the service lifecycle within a soa: Design time. Dev2Dev at dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2006/08/, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Q. Wall. Understanding the service lifecycle within a soa: Run time. Dev2Dev at dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2006/11/, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. O. Zimmermann and F. Mueller. Web services project roles. www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. A stakeholder-driven service life cycle model for SOA

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IW-SOSWE '07: 2nd international workshop on Service oriented software engineering: in conjunction with the 6th ESEC/FSE joint meeting
      September 2007
      56 pages
      ISBN:9781595937230
      DOI:10.1145/1294928

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 September 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader