skip to main content
10.1145/1321440.1321562acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Conceptual modeling by analogy and metaphor

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 November 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Metaphor is not merely a rhetorical device, characteristic of language alone, but rather a fundamental feature of the human conceptual system. A metaphor is understood by finding an analogy mapping between two domains. This paper argues that analogy mappings facilitate conceptual modeling by allowing the designer to reinterpret fragments of familiar conceptual models in other contexts. The contributions of the paper are expressed within the tradition of the Entity-Relation model.

References

  1. Barbosa, S. D. J.; Souza, C. S. (2001) "Extending software though metaphors and metonymies". Knowledge-based Systems, 14, Elsevier Science, pp. 15--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blackwell, A. F. (2006) "The reification of metaphor as a design tool". ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 13, Issue 4 (Dec. 2006), pp. 490--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Catarci, T.; Costabile, M. F.; Matera, M. (1996) "Which Metaphor for Which Database?". In: Proc. HCI'95 Conf. on People and Computers. Huddersfield, UK, pp. 151--165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chen, P. P.-S. (1976) "The entity-relationship model - toward a unified view of data". ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol. 1, Issue 1 (March 1976), p. 9--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Goguen, J. (1999) "An introduction to algebraic semiotics, with applications to user interface design". In: Nehaniv, C (ed.) Computation for Metaphors, Analogy and Agents. LNAI, Vol. 1562. Springer, pp. 242--291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Holyoak, K. J.; Thagard, P. (1995) Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lakoff, G.; Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lippert, M.; Schmolitzky, A.; Züllighoven, H. (2003) "Metaphor Design Spaces". In: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, XP 2003. Genova, Italy, May 25-29, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Winston, P. H. (1980) "Learning and reasoning by analogy". Communications of the ACM, 23, pp. 689--703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Conceptual modeling by analogy and metaphor

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '07: Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management
      November 2007
      1048 pages
      ISBN:9781595938039
      DOI:10.1145/1321440

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 November 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader