skip to main content
10.1145/1329125.1329165acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Toward verification of commitment protocols and their compositions

Published:14 May 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Commitment protocols have been proposed as a basis for modeling and enacting interactions among agents, such as those needed to carry out business processes. A central idea is that protocols would be developed and shared via libraries, and refined and composed to produce protocols that serve specific needs. Success in this program, therefore, presupposes that individual protocols and their compositions can be formally verified with respect to the properties of interest. This paper outlines an approach for verifying the correctness of commitment protocols and their compositions that exploits the well-known software engineering technique of model checking.

References

  1. N. Desai, A. U. Mallya, A. K. Chopra, and M. P. Singh. Interaction protocols as design abstractions for business processes. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(12):1015--1027, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. M. V. Eijk, F. S. D. Boer, W. V. D. Hoek, and J.-J. C. Meyer. A verification framework for agent communication. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 6(2):185--219, March 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H. Foster, S. Uchitel, J. Magee, and J. Kramer. Tool support for model-based engineering of web service compositions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services, pages 95--102, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. X. Fu, T. Bultan, and J. Su. Analysis of interacting BPEL web services. In Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference, pages 621--630, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Narayanan and S. A. McIlraith. Simulation, verification and automated composition of web services. In Proceedings of the 11th World Wide Web Conference, pages 77--88, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Pistore, P. Traverso, P. Bertoli, and A. Marconi. Automated synthesis of composite BPEL4WS web services. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Services, pages 295--301, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Venkatraman and M. P. Singh. Verifying compliance with commitment protocols: Enabling open Web-based multiagent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2(3):217--236, Sept. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Wooldridge and S. Parsons. Languages for negotiation. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pages 393--397, Aug. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AAMAS '07: Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
    May 2007
    1585 pages
    ISBN:9788190426275
    DOI:10.1145/1329125

    Copyright © 2007 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 May 2007

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,155of5,036submissions,23%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader