skip to main content
10.1145/1341012.1341051acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Smugglers and border guards: the GeoStar project at RPI

Published:07 November 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the GeoStar project at RPI, which researches various terrain (i.e., elevation) representations and operations thereon. This work is motivated by the large amounts of hi-res data now available. The purpose of each representation is to lossily compress terrain while maintaining important properties. Our ODETLAP representation generalizes a Laplacian partial differential equation by using two inconsistent equations for each known point in the grid, as well as one equation for each unknown point. The surface is reconstructed from a carefully-chosen small set of known points. Our second representation segments the terrain into a set of regions, each of which is simply described. Our third representation has the most long term potential: scooping, which forms the terrain by emulating surface water erosion.

Siting hundreds of observers, such as border guards, so that their viewsheds jointly cover the maximum terrain is our first operation. This process allows both observer and target to be above the local terrain, and the observer to have a finite radius of interest. Planning a path so that a smuggler may get from point A to point B while maximally avoiding the border guards is our second operation. The path metric includes path length, distance traveled uphill, and amount of time visible to a guard.

The quality of our representations is determined, not only by their RMS elevation error, but by how accurately they support these operations.

References

  1. J. Childs. Development of a two-level iterative computational method for solution of the Franklin approximation algorithm for the interpolation of large contour line data sets. Master's thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2003. http://www.rh.edu/~chil7317/. (Accessed 23 May 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. K. Dey. Curve and Surface Reconstruction: Algorithms with Mathematical Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. D. Floriani and P. Magillo. Regular and irregular multi-resolution terrain models: A comparison. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM International Symposium on Advances in GIS, pages 143--148, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. L. D. Floriani, P. Magillo, and E. Puppo. Variant: A system for terrain modeling at variable resolution. GeoInformatica, 4(3):287--315, October 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. W. R. Franklin. Triangulated irregular network program. ftp://ftp.cs.rpi.edu/pub/franklin/tin73.tar.gz (accessed 23 May 2006), 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. W. R. Franklin. Compressing elevation data. In Fourth International Symposium on Large Spatial Databases --- SSD '95. Portland, Maine, USA, 6--9 Aug 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. W. R. Franklin. Siting observers on terrain. In D. Richardson and P. van Oosterom, editors, Advances in Spatial Data Handling: 10th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, pages 109--120. Springer-Verlag, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. W. R. Franklin and M. Inanc. Compressing terrain datasets using segmentation. In Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 6313 Advanced Architectures, and Implementations XVI, San Diego CA, 15--16 August 2006. International Society for Optical Engineering. 6313-17, Session 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. W. R. Franklin and A. Said. Lossy compression of elevation data. In Seventh International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Delft, Aug. 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. W. R. Franklin and C. Vogt. Efficient observer siting on large terrain cells (extended abstract). In GIScience 2004: Third International Conference on Geographic Information Science, U Maryland College Park, 20--23 Oct 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. W. R. Franklin and C. Vogt. Multiple observer siting on terrain with intervisibility or lo-res data. In XXth Congress, International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Istanbul, 12--23 July 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. W. R. Franklin and C. Vogt. Tradeoffs when multiple observer siting on large terrain cells. In A. Riedl, W. Kainz, and G. Elmes, editors, Progress in spatial data handling: 12th international symposium on spatial data handling, pages 845--861. Springer, Vienna, 2006. ISBN 978-3-540-35588-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Garland. Multiresolution modeling: Survey and future opportunities. In Eurographics'99, pages 111--131, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Geomorphological Research Group. 10-meter data. http://rocky.ess.washington.edu/data/raster/tenmeter/, 2007. {Online; accessed 18-June-2007}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Gousie and W. R. Franklin. Converting elevation contours to a grid. In Eighth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, pages 647--656, Vancouver BC Canada, July 1998. Dept of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Gousie and W. R. Franklin. Constructing a DEM from grid-based data by computing intermediate contours. In E. Hoel and P. Rigaux, editors, GIS 2003: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pages 71--77, New Orleans, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. B. Gousie. Contours to digital elevation models: grid-based surface reconstruction methods. PhD thesis, Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering Dept., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. B. Gousie and W. R. Franklin. Augmenting grid-based contours to improve thin plate dem generation. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71(1):69--79, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. H. Hoppe. Progressive meshes. In ACM Siggraph '96 Proceedings, pages 99--108, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. Isenburg, Y. Liu, J. Shewchuk, and J. Snoeyink. Streaming computation of delaunay triangulations. In ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of ACM Siggraph 2006, volume 25, pages 1049--1056, July 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S.-S. Kim, S.-K. Choe, J.-H. Lee, and Y.-K. Yang. Level-of-detail-based rendering and compression for 3d gis. In International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pages 1942--1944, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Y.-S. Kim, D.-G. Park, H.-Y. Jung, H.-G. Cho, J.-J. Dong, and K.-J. Ku. An improved tin compression using delaunay triangulation. In Proceedings of Computer Graphics and Applications, pages 118--125, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. Lavery. Shape-preserving approximation of multiscale univariate data by cubic 11 spline fits. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 21:43--64(22), Jan. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. F. Losasso and H. Hoppe. Geometry clipmaps: Terrain rendering using nested regular grids. In ACM Siggraph 2004 Papers, pages 769--776, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D. J. Newman. Approximation with Rational Functions, volume 41 of Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. J. Owen and M. W. Grigg. The compression of digital terrain elevation data (dted) using jpeg 2000. Technical Report DSTO-TR-1548, Defense Science and Technology Organization Salisbury, Australia, February 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. D. Park, H. Cho, and Y. Kim. A tin compression method using delaunay triangulation. International Journal of GIS, 15(3):255--269, January 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. A. Said and W. A. Pearlman. A new fast and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 6:243--250, June 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. B. Speckmann and J. Snoeyink. Easy triangle strips for TIN terrain models. In Proc. 9th Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry, pages 239--244, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. C. Westort and W. R. Franklin. Alternative sculpting hypotheses for terrain data compression. In Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 6313 Advanced Architectures, and Implementations XVI, San Diego CA, 15--16 August 2006. International Society for Optical Engineering. 6313-16, Session 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. W. Zhang, Y. Wang, S.-C. Fang, and J. E. Lavery. Cubic l1 splines on triangulated irregular networks. Pacific Journal of Optimization, 2(2):289--317, may 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Smugglers and border guards: the GeoStar project at RPI

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            GIS '07: Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems
            November 2007
            439 pages
            ISBN:9781595939142
            DOI:10.1145/1341012

            Copyright © 2007 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 November 2007

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader