skip to main content
10.1145/1352135.1352188acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ethics training and decision-making: do computer science programs need help?

Published:12 March 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

A national web-based survey using SurveyMonkey.com was administered to 700 undergraduate computer science programs in the United States as part of a stratified random sample of 797 undergraduate computer science programs. The 251 program responses (36% response rate) regarding social and professional issues (computer ethics) are presented. This article describes the demographics of the respondents, presents results concerning whether programs teach social and professional issues, who teaches, the role of training in these programs, the decision making process as it relates to computer ethics and why some programs are not teaching computer ethics. Additionally, we provide suggestions for computer science programs regarding ethics training and decision-making and we share reasons why schools are not teaching computer ethics.

References

  1. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. 1991, December. Computing Curricula 1991. Retrieved July, 2005 from http://www.acm.org/education/curr91/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Appel, F. 2005. Privacy is a database topic that should be integrated into the computer scienc database curriculm. Proceedings of the eigth annual Ethics & Technology Conference. (pp. 331--339). St. Louis, MO: Saint Louis University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barroso, P. & Melara, G. 2004. Teaching of computer ethics at the state of California's universities and other countries. ETHICOMP E-Journal, 1(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gravetter, F. J. & Wallnau, L. B. 2004. Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Huck, S. W. (2000). Reading statistics and research. New York, NY: Longman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Huff, C. & Martin, C. D. 1995. Computing consequences: A framework for teaching ethical computing. Communications of the ACM, 38(12), 75--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. IEEE-CS/ACM Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. 2002. Computing Curricula 2001 Computer Science. (Final Report IEEE-CS/ACM Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin, D. C. 1999. From awareness to responsible action (part 1): developing a curriculum with progressive integration of ethics and social impact. SIGCSE Bulletin, 31(2): 8--10, New York, NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Martin, D, Huff, C., Gotterbarn, D. & Miller, K. 1996. Curriculum guidelines for teaching the consequences of computing. Symposium on Computers and the Quality of Life: Proceedings of the symposium on Computers and the quality of life (pp. 73--85). New York, NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Martin, D. C. & Weltz, E. Y. 1999. From awareness to action: Integrating ethics and social responsiblity into the computer science curriculum. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 29(2), 6--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Pulliam, S. C. 1994, June. Ethics and computer scientists. Recreating the Revolution: Proceedings of the annual national education computing conference (pp. 305--312). Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Scheaffer, R. L., Mendenhall, W. & Ott, L. 1979. Elementary survey sampling (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: PWS Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Tilley, P. 2005. 2005 Resource page: Sampling and fieldwork: Stratified sampling. Retrieved August 10, 2005 from http://cville.cna.nl.ca/ptilley/MR2300/Ch16.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Ethics training and decision-making: do computer science programs need help?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE '08: Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
        March 2008
        606 pages
        ISBN:9781595937995
        DOI:10.1145/1352135

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 March 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024
        SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
        November 30 - December 1, 2024
        Virtual Event , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader